ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: You had my full permission.

 OIG Hotline, please see the email communication from my husband below, confirming the facts regarding Box.com.  

This email has been forwarded to your attention with important additional introductory material within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com at 1:41 PM today, June 30, 2024 with the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: KPM Documentation Fwd: You had my full permission.

Due to time-sensitivity and safety issues connected to this information, please access this email at your earliest opportunity.

Thank you very much for your engagement with this concern.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Update: Important New Emails for the OIG Hotline

OIG Hotline, please see two important emails sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, the first sent at 12:36 PM today, June 30, 2024, bearing the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: xxx and xxxxxx xxxxx's Alleged False Witness Statements,  and the second sent at 1:49 PM today, June 30, 2024, bearing the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: KPM Fwd: Sunday afternoon discussion.

Given that these communications could be time-sensitive and pertain to our physical safety, please access them as soon as possible.

With appreciation for your attention to this matter,

Lane MacWilliams

UPDATE: Current FBI Threats Toward MacWilliams Family

OIG Hotline, the following email was sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com at 9:59 AM today, June 30, 2024, with an update sent at 2:38 PM today, June 30, 2024.

Please access the original commuication at your earliest opportunity due to safety implications for our family.

In gratitude,

Lane MacWilliams

Update: Transcript of Video Pertaining to Debate Response

OIG Hotline and Concerned Others,

The transcript at the conclusion of this email represents extemporaneous remarks captured via video.  They are best received by watching the original video, without question.  This transcript was prepared when my Jumpshare video link was compromised and, simultaneously, I received threat of the preparation of an AI-generated video replacement of my original video, perpetrated by the FBI and/or its affiliates.  Clearly, it would be best if people were hearing my actual words and impressions, as opposed to disinformation.

I will attempt to reload the video in the hope that a working link might be provided.

But, unfortunately, it does appear as though my Jumpshare account has been disabled in some important respects by the FBI and its affiliates at this time.  Because of this experience, it seems necessary to ask whether audio files have been replaced with disinformation as well.  It seems that it would be fair to assess that any incriminating or defamatory information provided via audio or video file is almost certainly faked by the FBI and/or its affiliates.

This content has been expanded within an email sent to the attention of the OIG Hotline and Concerned Others within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, in a communication sent on June 29, 2024 at 7:43 PM, with the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE and Concerned Others Re: Transcript of Video Re: Debate Response.

I would respectfully request that the OIG Hotline access this email at the earliest possible convenience.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Transcript of Video Response to First Presidential Debate:  My name is Lane MacWilliams, and I am just going to give a very brief commentary on the Presidential debate on Thursday, which I was fortunate to see.  And I would like to just comment on the fact that there's been a lot of punditry since Thursday night commenting on the performance of the candidates and their platforms and agendas for the nation.  

And I guess for me, it's really important to emphasize that I view the President and the Vice President as a team.  And I think that this is true for both candidates -- that that team,  that the way in which that team works, and the strengths and the views of the Vice President will be phenomenally important.  So, I would say that -- and this is true, as I said, for both candidates -- I think that we, of course, have been able -- we've been very fortunate to see the way in which President Biden and Vice President Harris respect one another and work together on issues that are of critical importance to the country, and in fact, to the world.  And then with regard to former President Trump, he has a very big decision to make with regard to his Vice Presidential candidate, and whether it will be Marco Rubio or J.D. Vance or someone else remains to be seen.  But these are critical decisions for their candidacies in my opinion -- for former President Trump's candidacy.  And with regard to the Biden/Harris ticket, I feel that Americans will be looking to President Biden and Vice President Harris together to consider the ways in which the nation will be governed.  And I think that, as I said, the nature of that partnership, the manner in which emergencies are faced or crises are faced or critical decisions are faced, the closeness of the relationship, the frankness of the relationship, the respect in the relationship are critical. Very, very critical.  And so I think that I myself have been fortunate enough to hear President Biden speak about Vice President Harris as a true partner, and she, of course, has spoken publicly many times about the fact that she is the first person in the Oval Office together with the President before a meeting and then the last person to leave, and that her judgment is so trusted and respected.  And of course, we can understand why.  And I believe that many people felt that Vice President Pence was a person of great individual integrity.  And I know that mattered to many Americans, too.  And so I think that this critical period of evaluation of President's and Vice President's tickets is just commencing.  I think it's just beginning.  And I think that as these two sets of candidates, these two tickets, come into definition and focus, the American people will have a much better opportunity to ask those questions about teamwork.  

I think that for our nation, some of the elements of balance of power have been invisible or inscrutable to the American people -- the manner in which the Congress and other branches of government work together with the White House is often out of view.  We often don't see how those exchanges transpire and how important they are.  But these are important questions for us, they're critical questions for us as we face some challenges going forward, and the manner in which some of our biggest inflection points are addressed -- inflection points such as the place of artificial intelligence within the governing of a nation, the role of various agencies in governing a nation according to the Presidential and Vice Presidential vision for the nation -- these are very important questions.  

And then, I think, too, one of the issues we have in our family -- in our nation right now -- I'm saying this, this was a Freudian slip -- "family."  "One of the issues we have in our 'family' right now" -- and what I really meant to say was "nation."  But the nation really is our family.  And so I'm glad I made that slip, because I was commenting yesterday about how many American families have both Democrats and Republicans somewhere in the extended family mix.  And so, the question is of course, how do we relate to one another?  How do we respect one another?  How do we speak to one another?  How do we hear one another?   And of course, this is a challenge for our nation, and it's a challenge for our families as well when we look at more extended American families.  Because Americans want to know that they're being heard, basically.  I think there are many Americans who feel as though they are not being heard as much as they would like to be by maybe their local representatives or their local government or their state government or elsewhere.  And so it's very important for us to understand how this has come about. How have people begun to feel that their voices have been, through no intention on anyone's part, marginalized.  And how can we listen to them to understand them?  How can we listen to one another to understand one another?  And this is true within our families, and this is true within our country as well.  Democracy requires a multiplicity of voices.  It really does.  It really requires that we're not all in perfect agreement.  We actually want some disagreement.  We want people to feel free to say that they have a different opinion.  Because that's what renders our governance so exceptional.  The fact that we can listen to one another, that we can say, "I'll stop what I'm saying for a moment, because I really want to hear your story, I really value you, I really want to hear your story and what happened to you and what you drew from it and whether I might help."  And all of these aspects of our humanity really are the foundation of our democracy.  And so I think that this simple question of listening to one another is very, very central.

Debates, of course, are not meant to illuminate these finer aspects of governance that transpire behind the scenes. But I think that the Presidential/Vice Presidential partnership will be critical for Americans to understand as we go forward through this election cycle.  And I know that President Biden and Vice President Harris have shared a philosophy, a set of policies, a set of values and an approach, and just a very, very close and respectful relationship.  And hopefully we will be able to see the partnership that former President Trump elects to create with his chosen Vice Presidential candidate.  So, I think that these questions of balance of power, really -- because we're talking about what's happening in the Oval Office behind the scenes -- we want a balance there. We want to know that our most powerful leaders are listening to elected officials who stand right beside them and share their concerns and may have different perspectives -- and that those voices are being valued very, very highly, because the American people have expressed their confidence in the points of view that they represent.  So, I think that these are important questions, and I don't think that they're illuminated by a single debate, at all.  So, I think it's early for people to be drawing definitive conclusions or making up their minds.  I think that it's very, very important for people to think about partnerships, think about balance of power and think about the most critical questions that define our democracy and our freedoms going forward.  

So, I think it would be very important to ask the American people how they want their President and Vice President to protect their own individual freedoms and sovereignty going forward.  How do they envision that that protection and advocacy and support and sustenance will transpire?  In an ideal world, how will they ask their President and Vice President to support them and support the whole nation going forward in terms of that sovereignty?  And I think that these issues will be raised, and I think that they will be addressed in future debates and future speeches and so, it's going to be very important for all of us to be paying close, close attention.  But this is my initial response.  I would encourage people not to overreact in one direction or another and to try to be very judicious and thoughtful about these issues of partnership and balance of power within the government.  And then I think that this will be a really critical point of discussion for us going forward.  

Why is that?  We really become I think arguably imperiled if there's only one person -- I wouldn't apply this to circumstances in the United States -- but in other nations around the world, we can see that in more autocratic systems, there's often only one person who is making critical decisions for the freedoms of millions or tens of millions or hundreds of millions.  And so, in these autocratic systems, there is no balance of power.  There's only a seat of power.  And in these autocratic systems, if it is judged that there's a threat to the seat of power, then we can start to have these purges, and this is what is done, of course, historically.   So, I think that in a democracy, by contrast, we're looking for that balance of power.  We don't want all that power to be held by one person.  We want our elected officials to share power. And the reason for that is that we really want to ensure that there's advocacy for everyone and that no one feels left out or shut down or unheard or disrespected or diminished or forgotten.  And so I think that's why it's so important to our democracy as a foundational requirement.  I think that the Presidency is so important, there's no questions about that.  It's such a powerful position.  The Presidency of the United States is arguably the most powerful individual elected position in the world -- very, very powerful position.  So, we can't argue with that.  There's no question about it.  And we have to feel very confident about our leadership in that role, certainly.  

I'm just also saying that I think circumstances can arise in which the partnership between and among elected leaders becomes more important than at other times.  And I think there's enough rapid change happening technologically in our society with artificial intelligence, as I mentioned, and other dynamics worldwide with regard to countries facing challenges with climate or supply shortages or health challenges as we've just gone through with the Covid pandemic -- so there are enough crises that emerge worldwide, that I think this is a time in our history when these questions surrounding the balance of power among elected representatives are probably more important than at other times.  And that would be my commentary on it.  I think that everybody recognizes that those running for President are deeply concerned with the future of our nation and care deeply about the future of our nation and our future democracy and our freedoms.  So we're at the beginning of this election cycle and we'll be learning a great deal more, but that's my initial response to anyone who might be curious about it.  Thank you.

Update: Comcast/Xfinity Permissions

OIG Hotline, my husband's and my own permissions for your Office to investigate the FBI's utilization of my husband's Comcast/Xfinity account for the purposes of falsified law enforcement reporting are available in email communications sent to your attention with lanemacwilliams@gmail.com in emails with the following subject headings and date/time stamps:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Comcast/Xfinity Permission, sent on June 28, 2024 at 10:54 PM
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: KPM Xfinity/Comcast Permission, sent on June 28, 2024 at 10:55 PM

Because the FBI appears to claims that our unexplained and prolonged Wifi outages this week were intended to result in the purchase of a compromised Xfinity/Comcast modem, facilitating falsified law enforcement reporting from our home while co-opting the IP addresses of our own devices, this is a matter pertaining to my family's safety and security.

Thank you for assisting us with your inquiries when you are able to do so.

Most gratefully,

Lane MacWilliams

********************

OIG Hotline, please see the email communication from my husband below, confirming the facts regarding Box.com.  

This email has been forwarded to your attention with important additional introductory material within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com at 1:41 PM today, June 30, 2024 with the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: KPM Documentation Fwd: You had my full permission.

Due to time-sensitivity and safety issues connected to this information, please access this email at your earliest opportunity.

Thank you very much for your engagement with this concern.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

FBI Corruption of Comcast/Xfinity Account

 

UPDATES: Request for Intervention; Democracy Requires Insistence

UPDATES:

June 27, 2024

1.  Do you have any thoughts with regard to the conviction of the President's son regarding weapons related charges two days ago?

Answer:  I was extremely concerned about the decision to prosecute in the first place.  This sort of crime is not normally tried, especially when a person has recovered from addiction and no longer possesses the weapon.  There clearly was a specific targeting.  And I will simply state that I can't count the number of times the FBI has threatened to have one or both of my own sons arrested.

2.  On what basis, please?

Answer:  On the basis of directives the FBI instructed my sons to take under threat of death.  I don't know what those directives were.  But I know they were specifically designed to give the FBI leverage over our whole family.

3.  Do you feel the FBI specifically targeted the President's son?

Answer:  I do, yes.  And I'm sure the circumstances were not identical to that of my own family, but I would guess that the targeting was both sophisticated and prolonged.  And I think that is unacceptable in every measure.

4.  Why do you feel so strongly about this?

Answer:  The FBI should not be holding members of the President's family captive to the agency's whims.  We all need to be deeply concerned as Americans when the far right has targeted the President's family in this manner.  

5.  Does the FBI have ambitions to control the White House?

Answer:  The FBI would like to control the whole world, so by definition, yes.

6.  Will you be watching the debate tonight?

Answer:  The FBI appears to have cut off my cable and internet, astonishingly.  I would hope to have had my access restored by that time.  But I cannot leave my documents within my home unattended in order to view the debate elsewhere.

7.  What is the reason for your concern over the documents?

Answer:  They represent years of work on behalf of the democracy, and the FBI would appropriate them at the first opportunity.

8.  You're suggesting that FBI affiliates would break into your house?

Answer:  I am.  

9.  Has this happened before?

Answer:  The last time I left the house for a prolonged period of time, there was an hour and twenty minutes of surveillance video missing on my return.  So, it must be assumed that there was entry to my residence.

10.  Would you be distressed to miss the debate because the FBI had cut off your access to cable and internet?

Answer:  Very.

11.  For what reason?

Answer:  A participatory democracy means that the electorate is paying attention to the priorities of our leaders and attending closely to their hopes and initiatives for the nation.  The FBI serves no national security interest by separating law-abiding American citizens from that access.

12.  Are you able to receive calls to your cell phone when your internet and cable are shut off?

Answer:  I am not.  Our cell coverage is insufficient for phone calls.

13.  So the FBI's actions have truly left you incommunicado.

Answer:  There's a great deal of vulnerability within the cessation of communication links.  I have only been able to post here with the support of my husband.

14.  If you are unable to watch the debate in real time, how will you view it?

Answer:  I will gain access afterwards and view the entire debate.  But I would like to see this exchange in real time.

15.  Are there communications which are time-sensitive for you?

Answer:  I may need to call a utility company today.

16.  If you need to leave the house to make the call to a utility, will you take your documents with you so that you can ensure their safety?

Answer:  Without question.  But the only reason I would take them with me would be to place a call to PG&E.  Afterwards, I would immediately return home with them and place them back inside.

17.  Would you be risking your life to place such a call?  Would the FBI target you through a sniping assault by falsely arguing that you were attempting to disseminate information?

Answer:  That's highly possible.

18.  Might they have cut off your communications in anticipating that possibility?

Answer:  Absolutely.  They could even have falsified online text or email communications to align with such a falsehood.

19.  So, how can you protect yourself?

Answer:  I would hope this dialogue would, in and of itself, be protective to a degree.

20.  The FBI has appeared to indicate that the FOIA reports and investigative reports may be on the way to you.

Answer:  This appears to be the agency's assertion, in which case I greatly appreciate the choice of the President, alongside the actions of the ODNI and the OIG Hotline, in making that possible.

21.  Your request for the reports is now based on their relevancy to a capital trial unfolding in the state of Idaho.  Is that correct?

Answer:  It is correct, yes.

22.  Will you let us know whether the reports arrive?

Answer:  I may be encouraged to address the reports in a confidential context when the reports first arrive.  A great deal depends on their specific content.

23.  Would you expect to have contact from Washington, D.C. following the reports' arrival?

Answer:  I would.  Yes.

24. Have you had contact or communication with anyone other than your husband over the last several days?

Answer:  I have not.  I texted my sons over the weekend, and those communications were conveyed to the OIG Hotline.  But that is all.

25.  You have remained at home over the last several days?

Answer:  For the last several days and for quite a lot longer.

26.  Have you engaged in email communications with anyone over the last several days?

Answer:  I emailed three executives at the Bank of America, and I requested that my husband print that communication.  Other than that, all of my emails have been sent to the attention of the OIG Hotline.  

27.  You have not been forwarding audio files to the OIG Hotline over the last several days.  Is there a reason for that choice?

Answer:  First, we have no internet, so uploads are not possible.  But second, my Jumpshare account was hacked, and simultaneously, I received threats from the FBI that the agency was utilizing AI-generated audio to falsify sound files that I was preparing to send to the OIG Hotline.  I still have the original files, which are quite unremarkable.  But if I were to send a file that the FBI falsified, my family and I would be vulnerable to immediate attack.

28.  Your lives could be immediately endangered by falsified law enforcement reporting of this nature.

Answer:  Yes, they could.

29.  You have maintained the unaltered files for the OIG Hotline upon request.  

Answer:  Yes, I have.

30.  Have all of your actions been lawful and honorable over the entire period of your communication with the OIG Hotline and prior?

Answer:  Yes, they have.

31.  Have all of your husband's actions been lawful and honorable over the entire period of your communication with the OIG Hotline and prior?

Answer:  Yes, they have.

32.  Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?

Answer:  I do.

Lane MacWilliams

*************************************************************************

June 26, 2024

OIG Hotline, this is to request that President Biden intervene as soon as he is able to prevent the FBI and its affiliates from continuing to deploy sniping-capable robotic devices at my home.  Certainly, it would be best if these devices were promptly removed from our property.  This withdrawal would be greatly appreciated, given the circumstances that the FBI has engaged in habitual lying with regard to my case and that of my family members.

 The United States is not one more totalitarian nation that murders its honorable and courageous whistleblowers, in the same way that Russia took the life of Navalny.  

That's why I feel confident that President Biden, in supporting democracy and the rule of law, as he often expresses to the public, will support the civil liberties and human rights of this honorable American whistleblower, and all her family members as well.

In defending the safety of this whistleblower and her family on an immediate basis, President Biden will demonstrate his belief in our democracy, our individual freedoms set forth by the Constitution, and our national sovereignty as critical to Americans' our potential.

I would respectfully request that my Wifi coverage be restored and that recent knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting perpetrated by the FBI be disallowed in its entirety, please.

No American whistleblower should suffer predation by the FBI.  When it happens, we turn to our Commander in Chief to halt its progress.

I now await that act of leadership, and I am confident it will find prompt expression given President Biden's fortitude in defending our freedoms.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*******************************************************************

June 26, 2024

OIG Hotline, my communications to your Office are being impeded by obstructed Wifi at my residence at this time.  My husband is assisting me by driving to a location with Wifi once within each 24-hour period.

The following emails were sent to your Office's attention recently within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, lmacwilliams77419@gmail.com and lmacwilliams7417@gmail.com:  

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE and Concerned Others Re: FBI Threats of Gas Explosion at 45 Vista Verde Way, sent on June 26, 2024 after 9:00 PM
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE and Concerned Others Re Apparent FBI Confession of Forged Documents Intended to Support Knowingly False Allegations Connected to Phoenix Program Crimes, sent on June 26, 2024 after 9:00 PM
  
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:  Notes to Myself, June 26, 2024, sent on June 26, 2024 after 9:00 PM
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Photos at 45 Vista Verde Way, June 25, 2024, Parts 1-9, sent on June 26, 2024 after 9:00 PM
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Photos at 45 Vista Verde Way, June 26 2024, Parts 1-    , sent on June 26, 2024 after 9:00 PM

Please note that, due to ongoing Wifi disruption at our residence, my husband is posting this update from the nearest Wifi connection available to him.

I remain very grateful for his assistance, as I have been under sniping threat within my own home for the entire day.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

********************************************************************************

June 25, 2024

 1. You have extended to the ODNI a request for your FOIA materials and investigative materials as a necessity given their pertinence to a capital trial currently unfolding in the state of Idaho.  Will that request now be honored as a requirement under the law?  An ethical mandate?  Do you have any indication?

Answer:  I do think that ethics require the provision of these materials given the fact that a young man, wrongfully accused, is facing the death penalty.

2.  Is there a time limit on the provision of these materials?

Answer:  I think the materials need to be provided on an immediate basis.

3.  If President Biden supports the rule of law in the defense of the accused in the Idaho trial, will the reports be provided to you on an immediate basis?

Answer:  They will.

4.  You are insistent that the accused not be forgotten or sacrificed to other concerns within the government.

Answer:  Democracy requires exactly this form of insistence.  We need to powerfully defend the rights of those who seem to have been deprived of all larger advocacy by the society.  If we fail to come to one another's ready defense in ensuring that all the facts in a capital trial are known, then we abandon the possibility of a sovereign nation of sovereign citizens -- and not only for ourselves but for future generations.

5.  In accordance with your insistence in this matter, are you expecting your FOIA reports and investigative reports right away?

Answer:  Right away.

6.  You do not believe that further delays are justifiable for any reason.

Answer:  No, they are not.

7.  Will you be watching the debate on Thursday night?

Answer:  With avid interest.

8.  Thank you for sharing your thoughts in this forum.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to Bank of America

 OIG Hotline, due to FBI threats of falsifying the audio of my phone calls, I will not be calling Bank of America back today to confirm that there are no current fraud claims on my account.

Instead, I will be waiting to hear back from Bank of America Customer Service, while preparing to send the content of these emails through registered mail.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWillams

Emails for the OIG Hotline -- Post in Progress

 OIG Hotline, please see an email sent to your attention within lanemacwilliiams@gmail.com, lmacwilliams77419@gmail.com and lmacwilliams7417@gmail.com, bearing the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Inspired By You, sent at 7:14 AM on June 25, 2024.  This constitutes a communication from Pinterest sent to my email inbox.

In addition, please see an email sent to your attention at 8:06 AM on June 25, 2024, bearing the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTINE Re: Unusual Daytime Arson Threat from the FBI; Staged Vehicle Accident Threat from the FBI.

Thank you for allowing me to bring these emails to your attention.

I anticipate that my Wifi may well be disrupted by the FBI today, as it was yesterday.

I will be endeavoring to document my peaceful and solitary presence at home should this occur.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Correspondence with Neighbor Ellen Rice

 OIG Hotline, please be apprised of my email correspondence with neighbor Ellen Rice.

If the FBI were to press Ms. Rice for a falsified witness statement and combined this crime with a Wifi outage at my home, it would be exceptionally easy for the FBI to falsely justify a law enforcement raid a my property.

Also, if I were to attempt to locate Wifi reception on Vista Verde Way, close to the top of my driveway, as I did on June 24, 2024, Ms. Rice could appear and attest to myriad falsehoods for the FBI, with a like intention of prompting an unjustified law enforcement raid on the home of an FBI whistleblower.

Thank you for your support in preventing this possible outcome.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Apparent Hack of Jumpshare Accoung, June 25, 2024

 

Important Email for the OIG Hotline and Concerned Others

 OIG Hotline, please reference an email sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, lmacwilliams77419@gmail.com and lmacwilliams7417@gmail.com, bearing the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE and Concerned Others Re: Fwd: Attn: Ms. Karen Arakelian, Ms Holly O'Neill, and Mr. Brian T. Moynihan Re: Formal Request for Email Confirmation of No Active Fraud Claim on Bank of America Credit Card Ending 8998/6442, sent at 1:09 PM.

Over the weekend, the FBI appeared to repeatedly allege that the agency had filed a fraud claim on my Bank of America credit card without my knowledge or consent.

As a result of repeatedly conflicting information from the Bank of America on this issue, I emailed its personnel today in order to ensure that this matter is promptly resolved in a verifiable manner.

Thank you for allowing me to document these concerns with your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWillams

The Sovereignty of a Son

 1.  The latest threats to your family from the FBI appear to focus on knowingly falsified claims through the Phoenix Program, with falsified witness statements allegedly coerced from your youngest son under threat to his life.  Is that correct?

Answer:  These appear to be the allegations, yes.

2.  Has your youngest son been coerced into claiming that you or your husband or another family member could possibly have committed capital crimes that are really the work of Phoenix Program personnel?

Answer:  Well, as I said a few days ago, the FBI has demonstrated astonishing aggression in appearing to wish to falsely blame my family members or myself for the worst of Phoenix Program crimes against the law-abiding American public.  And I've addressed that in great detail.

3.  What do you make of your youngest son's alleged cooperation in such falsified reporting?

Answer:  The FBI has tortured my youngest son, my older son, and my youngest son's girlfriend.  And I think that these crimes against the innocent have very profound effects on a person's sovereignty, on their ability to hold to the truth under pressure from an unethical FBI handler, and their fundamental confidence that their nation is supporting a future that is worthy and virtuous -- and one in which they can whole-heartedly take part.

4.  Your sons and MG have suffered terrible health impacts as a direct result of crimes committed against them by the FBI.  Has President Biden committed to reverse those harms?

Answer:  The  reversal of those harms has not been manifested as of yet.  Perhaps the President has been waiting for the ODNI or the OIG Hotline to provide me with my reports tomorrow, June 24, 2024, or an email indicating that the reports have been mailed to me and supplying me with tracking information as a first step.

5.  To turn back to Phoenix, what are the specific crimes that Special Forces have been tasked with committing against you or against your property?

Answer:  I am told that the deployment of a DEW which the FBI refers to as "the thrower" has been authorized for use overnight tonight.

6.  Is "the thrower" intended to cause brain damage specifically?

Answer:  That appears to be its purpose, yes.

7.  And the FBI has allegedly obtained approval to deploy the thrower against you yourself?

Answer:  The FBI appears to allege that this is the case, yes.

8.  Is this a case of the FBI acting without authorization, terrorizing the public in a Frankenstein role, without effective controls or restraints?

Answer:  The FBI claims it has obtained permission for deployment of the thrower in this case, though I cannot comment on who may have extended that authorization.

9.  With regard to the falsehoods coerced from your younger son, did he previously deny to you in writing that he had ever experienced any abuse during childhood?  And didn't you supply that written denial to the OIG Hotline?

Answer:  Yes, and yes.  This is a beloved young man who has been grievously tortured by the FBI as the agency is coercing renewed false claims pertaining to our family.

10.  Returning to Phoenix for a moment, it has been alleged to you that the coerced falsified witness statements from your younger son are to be used as false justification for the AirForce Hotshots to perpetrate arson at your Portola Valley property, in addition to arson perpetrated within the walls and sealed spaces of your residence through robotic devices lighting magnesiums sticks.  Is that true?

Answer:  The FBI has extended these highly specific allegations to me, yes.

11.  Why would certain segments of the FBI allege these plans to you?

Answer:  Because I think they disagree with them.  I think they disagree with the injustice of predation toward an honorable and law-abiding whistleblower of FBI malfeasance.

12.  The FBI has also threatened arson at another family home, at your son's San Francisco residence, and at the boatyard storing your small sailboat, as well.  Is that correct?

Answer:  These threats have been extended, yes, in addition to staged suicide threats and overdose threats toward my beloved family members.  So, it's very upsetting to say the least.

13.  Do you believe that your FOIA reports and the investigative reports of the OIG Hotline and the ODNI will be provided to you within a day or two?

Answer:  The FBI seems to believe the release of this information is imminent, yes.

And given the stepped up aggression toward my family, we cannot field the onslaught of FBI falsified reporting and aggression much longer.  

So, the time is now.

14.  Is the President supporting your safety at this critical time?  Is he disallowing all falsified reporting coming from the FBI, the CIA, and their affiliates as soon as it emerges?  Is he disallowing the falsified witness statements of your sons and MG, provided under torture?

Answer:  I hope President Biden has chosen to disallow all false reporting against us, yes. I hope he has taken that laudable ethical stance in our defense.

15.  This would bring you a tremendous measure of needed safety, wouldn't it?

Answer:  Without question.  He is Commander in Chief, so his determination regarding whistleblower safety is paramount and transformative.

16.  You believe that President Biden's insistence on the defense of the democracy in the context of the 
FBI's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting is genuine.

Answer:  I do, yes.

17.  Will you please check in with us in the morning to apprise of any new developments?

Answer:  Of course I will.

18.  Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?

Answer:  I do.

Lane MacWilliams

 

Apparent FBI Threats of Corrupted Audio Files

 OIG Hotline, it is currently 12:59 AM on June 23, 2024.

I have transferred seven audio files of my husband's visit to our son Graham on Saturday, June 22, 2024 onto my cell phone.  These files depict a perfectly normal visit between father and son. 
There is nothing remarkable about their exchange or conversation.  They simply represent a casual and loving dialogue from beginning to end.

However, I am informed that the FBI may possibly coerce a knowingly falsified witness statement from Graham and follow that with AI-generated audio files replacing my own audio attachments sent to your Office.  The FBI has ready access to my Google accounts, and this technical feat seems well within agency capabilitiesl

The intent appears to be an unjustified law enforcement raid at our home, intended to include violence on the part of law enforcement.

As a result of this threat, I will maintain the audio files in my possession, along with the original recording on my Sony audio recorder, for safeguarding of the documentation against corruption at this time.

A number of the FBI threats that were extended to me included a "like father, like son," "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" assertion.  

Is the FBI trying to suggest that my husband and son are in collusion regarding some previous set of knowingly false allegations extended by the agency?  Which ones? I don't know and I am loathe to guess.  But it would seem that our lives may have been placed at risk as a result of this latest FBI scheme to knowingly falsify documentation provided to your Office.

Is the FBI attempting to accuse other of my family members of a felony?  Is the FBI attempting to justify an attempt to take their lives via staged car accident, as has been recently threatened in the context of a rear-end collision while "waiting for the light to change"?  Or to take their lives through a hit and run, as has been recently threatened?  Or another scheme of harm?

Who could possibly have authorized such schemes of harm and for what motive?

I remain extremely concerned about the FBI's threats of altering audio files provided to your Office with the intent of falsely accusing either my family members or myself of serious crimes.

The FBI's alleged intention to utilize AI-generated audio to falsely allege that I filed a fraud claim with Bank of America recently represents yet another threatened deceit that could have extremely serious consequences.

Given the FBI's stepped-up aggression, at least in the context of its threats, it seems the agency believes that my FOIA reports and the investigative reports of the your Office and the ODNI may soon be provided to me.  I can only urge that provision at the earliest possible time in the interests of our safety.

Thank you for allowing me to document these concerns.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Postscript:  Please note that I experienced a Wifi outage at my home address, almost certainly caused by the FBI, beginning at approximately 4:03 PM on June 22, 2024.  I documented my time alone at home with continuous audio coverage and still photos.  My husband arrive home at slightly after 8:00 PM, at which point he kindly drove into town, at my request, to locate Wifi coverage for the express purpose of finalizing my blog post "Twenty-eight Questions..." and sending email documentation of the identical content.

Twenty-eight Questions and Answers on June 22, 2024

 1.  You were asked to once again declare your political affiliation today.  Is that correct?

Answer:  It is, yes.

2.  What are your concerns about that query?

Answer:  Well, my concerns can be best conveyed by the following:  it is a truth universally acknowledged that people only ask you to disclose your political affiliations before midnight when they're planning to make an attempt on your life shortly after midnight.

This is what I have noticed.

And the answer to the question is actually immaterial to the peril at hand, which will remain unchanged by your reply.

3.  You sound as though you have fielded many threats and attempts on your life, and your family members' lives.

Answer:  I have.  Hundreds of thousands of threats over a span of years.   And not a small number of real world harms.

8.  The FBI has alleged that your two sons, MG, your Aunt Margaret and others are now being threatened by the agency into providing knowingly falsified witness statements implicating you yourself of Phoenix Program crimes.  What is your response to this?

Answer:  I spoke to this issue the other day, when my husband had allegedly been falsely implicated by coerced witness statements from our two sons, whose lives had been threatened.  So, I republished that blog post this afternoon, as all the same revelations and admonishments to corrupt FBI personnel and their corrupt affiliates apply.

9.  The FBI has appeared to convey to you this afternoon that Air Force Hotshots have been tasked by President Biden in setting fire to your property in Portola Valley -- a threat which has often been extended to you previously.

Answer:  This appears to have been the FBI's allegation, yes.

10.  And was this based on knowingly falsified witness statements coerced under torture?  Witness statements President Biden himself is responsible for disallowing?

Answer:  The President is responsible for empowering OIG Hotline investigators and ODNI investigators to disallow the false rerporting.

11.  And doesn't he possess a profound conflict of interest because of his access to funds that have been awarded in your name through both of these offices?

Answer:  Without question, he does.

12.  Can the President's failure to allow disqualification of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting regarding your family members and yourself be seen as an attempted first degree murder, given the threats you are now receiving of both arson and unjustified law enforcement raid on your home, intended to result in your demise?

Answer:  That's for others to decide, certainly, when they have the benefit of the proven facts of the matter.

13.  Earlier this week, the FBI interfered with your credit card accounts at Bank of America to falsely file a fraud claim in your name.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  The FBI falsely filed a fraud claim on a mysterious Netflix charge, allegedly with the plan of directing the Bank to investigate and disqualify the claim.  A false fraud claim, according to the FBI, constitutes a felony.  And the FBI would then prevent me from claiming settlements and penalties awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI through this criminal scheme.

14.  The FBI apparently felt that this was the easiest way to accuse you of a felony?  By filing a false fraud claim on a credit card without your knowledge or consent?

Answer:  Yes.  This is what the agency alleged to me.

15.  You do not have a fraud claim filed with your credit card at Bank of America, Chase Bank, or any other bank?

Answer:  No, I do not.

16.  And your phone calls with your banks have all been audio recorded in order to ensure that you have evidence of your conversations with your banks?

Answer:  Yes, they have been, and I retain those original audio files.

17.  Is it true that the FBI claims to have created an AI-generated audio file depicting your voice calling Bank of America and filing a claim with the fraud department?

Answer:  The FBI has alleged that the agency has been highly aggressive in creating fake audio files of my voice as of late, so this is entirely possible.  However, my call log to Bank of America is matched by my original recordings of those calls, all of which have been conveyed to the attention of the OIG Hotline.  So, the FBI's lies in this regard are easily unwound.  The real concern resides in the possibility that the FBI would make false claims of the commission of a felony after my potential demise, when I'm not present to defend myself.

18.  And the objective in that case would be to prevent your family members from inheriting funds awarded under your name by the OIG Hotline and the ODNI?

Answer:  Apparently so.

19.  You have made clear today via email, once again, that full disclosure from the OIG Hotline and the ODNI is necessary for your family's safety and your own.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, I sent an email to the attention of the OIG Hotline at 11:31 AM regarding this matter in order to document my perspectives fully.

20.  Would you include the content of that email here for us?

Answer:  Certainly.  Here it is:

21.  You have documented today that the air quality is poor within your home and that radiation levels are out of range high as well.  Yet you and your husband have done nothing to cause these problems.  Is the FBI's perpetration of these environmental harms wrongfully justified by knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting?

Answer:  Absolutely, yes.  The agency always attempts to anchor physical harms with knowingly falsified witness statements or other false "evidence" of crimes.  This is the nature of the far right's perfectionism in dotting all the i's and crossing all the t's in totalitarianism.

22.  Why is the FBI so perfectionistic about the false documentation?  Don't they create myriad problems for themselves in leaving such a provable train of lies?

Answer:  First, it's important to recognize that the vast majority of the public will never gain access to the falsified material intended by the FBI to justify their harm.  It's only through the honorable efforts of the OIG Hotline and the ODNI that my circumstance is different.  

But the main answer to your question is that the human conscience is a powerful force.  The FBI wishes to think well of itself.  Ergo, if the agency is harming people, FBI personnel must ensure that they have "proven" some degree of criminality in documentation before a concealed court proceeding, which of course the FBI's victim knows nothing about.

But T.S Eliot said it best when he wrote that "Half the harm that is done in this world is done by people who want to think well of themselves.

23.  You experienced a Wifi outage this afternoon, June 22, 2024, while you were working on materials for the OIG Hotline.  Is that outage persisting at this time?

Answer:  Yes, it is currently 5:13 PM, and my Wifi is still being obstructed by the FBI, a circumstance which is quite dangerous for me, unfortunately.

24.  Why does the FBI feel comfortable in violating your human rights in this manner?

Answer:  The agency has been authorized at a high level to do so, clearly.  So there are corruption problems in multiple areas of the government, and substantive conflicts of interest that appear to be driving them.

25.  Will you be receiving your FOIA reports and the investigative reports from the OIG Hotline and the ODNI on Monday, June 24, 2024?

Answer:  If I survive, I will.  

26.  Can those who are attempting to harm you for their own personal gain be stopped between now and then?

Answer:  We have to hope that the truth wielded by benevolent American citizens is more powerful than the lies and harms wielded by the far right.  And we just need to give the effort everything we've got in order to ensure that honorable and law-abiding Americans, like us, will retain their freedoms and their sovereignty over time.

27.  Would you like to express your gratitude to the OIG Hotline and the ODNI for their efforts to safeguard your family by conveying the reports into your hands with full disclosure?

Answer:  Emphatically so.  These investigators have been a lifeline for my family and myself more times than I can count.  And, though I have never spoken with them, and I don't know their names, I can state my heartfelt belief that I have been immensely fortunate to have the opportunity to convey my concerns to their attention over time.

28.  Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?

Answer:  I do.

Lane MacWilliams

xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxx is the Murderer of Four Innocent College Students in Moscow Idaho in November of 2022

This blog post was originally posted without redactions on June 20, 2024.  Further, it was emailed, also without redactions, to lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, lmacwilliams77419@gmail.com and lmacwilliams7417@gmail.com on June 20, 2024 at 6:21 PM.

The redacted version of this content, appearing below, was emailed, with redactions, to lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, lmacwilliams77419@gmail.com and lmacwilliams7417@gmail.com today, June 22, 2024 at 3:11 PM.

*******************************************************************************

This is my declaration regarding the true perpetrator, as he appeared to confess his crimes to me, of the murders of four innocent college students in Moscow, Idaho in November of 2022.  

xxxxxxx xxxx, a leading member of Russian-affiliated organized crime, a close FBI affiliate, and a reported "friend" of President Biden, alleged to me that he murdered Ethan Chapin, 20, Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Madison Mogen, 21 in a residence in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2024.

I documented the details of his apparent confession for the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice shortly afterwards, with a request that they proceed in the manner they felt most appropriate under the circumstances.

Recently, I communicated to the Kootenai County Pubic Defender Anne Taylor to tell her that I had information relevant to the prosecution of her client, Bryan Kohberger, and I requested my FOIA reports and the investigative reports associated with them on the basis of the capital trial currently unfolding in the state of Idaho.

It seemed, at least until today, that President Biden was going to uphold the law by fulfilling those requests and by doing so immediately.

But this afternoon, I received an apparent confession from the FBI that President Biden had decided to allow the FBI's knowing defamation impugning my character, integrity and stability.  Along with that, he allegedly intends to invade the settlements and penalties awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.

In other words, President Biden allegedly decided, in collusion with the FBI, to wrongfully allow knowingly falsified allegations against my family members and myself in order to take our lives and abscond with the funds.  Once again, I and my family members are facing the unthinkable:  a President willing to authorize first-degree murder at the prospect of financial gain.  Financial gain for himself, financial gain for the Democratic Party, financial gain for his family members and friends, and financial gain for the very FBI personnel and affiliates who have stalked me unjustly for the last seven years with an intent to take my life under the Phoenix Program.  

My primary stalker, xxxxxxx xxxx, is said to have purchased a $40 million yacht with the proceeds of funds directed to him by President Biden.

That's right.  Our President has been rewarding a sadistic serial killer who has terrorized my family for years while this same public official has intentionally withheld my Freedom of Information Act reports and the associated investigative reports conducted by the OIG Hotline and the ODNI leadership, the Honorable Avril Haines.

And all the while, the President has been authorizing the FBI to "neutralize" my family through the Phoenix Program.

Most recently, corrupt FBI agent Tom Lyons, at the instruction of xxxxxxx xxxx, has tortured my sons in return for falsified witness statements which allegedly state that I myself -- or one of my beloved family members -- is a serial killer, too!

Doesn't it just sound like old home week for the serial killers' convention?

Truly, I have never heard of anything so ludicrous in my entire life.

xxxxxxx xxxx has alleged that the FBI has placed physical evidence of capital crimes on my 3 1/2 acre property in Portola Valley and at my family home on Cape Cod!  And he has further alleged that the plan is to take my life through a shooting perpetrated during a violent police raid at my home!  Finally, he has alleged that President Biden, with the lure of billions of dollars in settlements and penalties awarded in my name, has authorized the whole corrupt endeavor!

Astonishing and appalling in equal measure.

I need to express that, at this point, President Joseph R. Biden is the primary reason I have lost faith in my nation.  Perhaps the disappointment is just that much greater when a leader has a kind face and extols the virtues of democracy, only to reveal himself to be a slanderer, a crook, and a murderer underneath the thin veneer.

I would rather have a leader who doesn't wear a mask when he's speaking to the nation.

Donald Trump does not pretend to love democracy.  Frankly, while I may not agree with the sentiment, I can respect the frankness more than President Biden's deceit.  

At least with President Trump, the nation knows it will be voting for autocracy.  There will be fewer surprises with whatever follows.

President Biden's administration has deluged me with loyalty requests as of late.  Am I loyal to President Biden?  Do I pledge to vote for President Biden?  Do I agree with President Biden's assertion that "this election is bigger than any one of us"?  

You know, good people, it is exceptionally difficult to pledge to vote for the man who has been directly responsible as a corrupt Commander-in-Chief for so much of my family's suffering and my own.

So, I'm going to explain something, and I'm going to explain it carefully.  If I don't receive my FOIA reports and the investigative reports related to them by Monday, June 24, 2024, I will be helping President Trump and the Republican Party sweep the White House, the Senate and the House this November.  And after that, I will be helping them to prosecute President Biden for every one of his crimes against my family members and myself.  I will willingly testify against him in the context of any prosecution the Republican Party intends to pursue against him.  I will assist the Republican Party in every way possible in ensuring that President Biden is held to a full and public accounting of his crimes.

What will the public think of his close "friendship" with the murderer of the four innocent college students in Moscow, Idaho?

One can only imagine.

Has anyone yet created a meme of these two men clinking champagne glasses on the deck of Mr. xxxx's yacht, purchased with their ill-gotten gains?

That's a sight that would seem to adequately capture the corrupt character of our current President.

And to be clear, I'm not disappointed by the lack of honesty and integrity in President Biden.  I'm horrified by it.

It's not that the man should be out of office.  It's that the man should be serving hard time.

None of the prosecutions against President Trump approaches the avarice, collusion and predation of President Biden's authorization of my murder on the basis of knowingly false accusations (and presumably the deaths of all of my family members who could object to his actions) -- in order for him to abscond with funds awarded in my name by the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.  Not even close.

So, I really don't think President Biden should be taunting President Trump as a felon, given the seriousness of the crimes President Biden has planned and authorized in this case.

But for now, I'm putting these men on notice, together with the corrupt FBI which is in their service:

• Withdraw your false allegations of criminal activity allegedly perpetrated by my family members and myself, and do so immediately.
• Withdraw your false allegations of psychological instability as a wrongful justification for surveillance, violence, theft of funds awarded in my name, and indefensible harms.
• Halt all trespass on my properties save for that necessitated by the removal of whatever physical "evidence" of Phoenix Program crimes has been wrongfully placed there.
• Provide me with my FOIA reports and the investigative reports from the OIG Hotline and the ODNI affiliated with them, and do so without redaction or omission unacceptable to me by June 24, 2024.
• Direct a high level attorney to contact me in order to resolve outstanding concerns regarding national security clearances and ongoing concerns regarding the health and safety of my family members, MG and myself.
• Restore our health on an immediate basis, without attempting to negotiate a payoff for the reversal of harms you yourselves planned and authorized.
• Halt all threats of arson, lawsuits, audits, plane accident, car accident, hit and run, H5N1 transmission, transmission of other deadly diseases, sniper assault, brain damage, etc.  Halt all environmental harms immediately.

There are other concerns, but the list above serves as a reasonable starting point.

Whenever my beloved mother encountered corruption during her life, she would "read the riot act" to the perpetrators.  Her righteous indignation inspired in everyone their admiration, my respect and their awe.

I am my mother's daughter gentlemen.

I haven't read you the Riot Act yet, but I will if you fail to meet my standards for the honesty and full disclosure incumbent upon you all at this point in time.

Lane MacWilliams

Open Sesame, Apriti Sesamo, Sesame Ouvre-toi, Sesam Offne Dich, Hirakegoma, Abrete Sesamo, Sesam Oppna Dig

 1.  You conveyed to ODNI Investigations and OIG Hotline Investigations today your formal request for your FOIA materials and investigative reports on the basis of a death-penalty trial now proceeding in the state of Idaho.

Answer:  Yes, I did.

2.  Will that be the key to your receiving all of the relevant reports?

Answer:  I have to hope so.  I likened the experience of requesting these reports today to standing on the outside of a stone wall and uttering the words "open sesame" in forty different languages.  No one has succeeded in opening the hidden door previously.  The public at large doesn't know the protocol, and neither do you.  There's no legal advocacy available to address this properly.  So, you just need to try and try and try and try again.

3.  Will the reports be released to you via courier, if indeed ODNI and OIG Hotline Investigations now send them?

Answer:  I want to be clear that I believe ODNI Investigations and OIG Hotline investigators have wanted to send the materials prior to now.  I simply think they have been obstructed in doing so.

And with regard to your question about a courier, I hope this method is employed.  It's really the only way to ensure that materials are not intercepted by the FBI en route.  The FBI has the clear ability to remove individual pieces of mail from FedEx, UPS, and the US Postal Service.  So, alternatives must be pursued, and I think a courier is an excellent answer to this problem.

4.  After a few years of stoicism, you allowed yourself, uncharacteristically, to express some grief and frustration yesterday.

Answer:  I had a good cry in other words.  Yes, it's not like me to indulge in the expression of emotion when my loved ones' health, lives and livelihoods are on the line, as is my own.  But it was time to allow myself a brief period of human sorrow over how difficult this has all been.

I want to be sure to convey my gratitude to those whose efforts have allowed me to live long enough to express that grief.

Human beings aren't meant to be under siege for prolonged periods of time -- months or years.  And one of the ways in which I have dealt with extreme stressors is to disallow real emotion -- to defer it until a later time.  But yesterday was the later time.  And it felt fantastic to be able to express to myself, in the confines of my own home, that to be stalked by a serial killer with powerful government ties for years on end represents an extraordinary violation of fundamental human rights.

5.  Do you believe that female investigators have gone to great lengths to try to assist you in this circumstance?

Answer:  I don't know any of the names or genders of the investigators involved.  And truly, I would wish to express profound gratitude to any and all investigators who have labored diligently to ascertain the truth of my complaint of falsified law enforcement reporting as perpetrated by the FBI.

Having said that, I do think that women may view long-term stalking by a serial killer with political protections in somewhat of a different light from others.

6.  Why do you feel this way?

Answer:  Because such a situation is genuinely terrifying for women.  And part of the definition of civilization is that the society as a whole refuses to accept predation toward women and children and will intervene decisively and lawfully when it happens.  So, if we abandon the vulnerable when they are being targeted for profit and entertainment by powerful predators and the corrupt law enforcement personnel who are enabling them, women and children everywhere in the nation lose the possibility of real safety.  And that's a tremendous loss -- just overwhelming.  Civilization takes an enormous step backward when this happens.

7.  We do see all kinds of crimes toward women and children during overt conflict all over the world.

Answer:  Yes, tragically, this is true.  But the United States is not defining itself as a nation experiencing domestic or civil conflict that would lead to the break down of legal protections for the vulnerable.  So, we need to rather heroically try to uphold them in circumstances like this one.

8.  The man stalking you is experiencing some kind of psychological obsession with causing you harm.  Is that correct?

Answer:  His friends and associates have said that he can't stop fantasizing about causing me harm.  So, it's extremely upsetting.  Not infrequently, he has sent a message to my cell phone stating, "I think we both know how this will end."

And while he clearly has violence in mind, when I receive this assertion, my answer is, "With your arrest!"

9.  Yet part of your frustration is that this man has been aided and abetted by the local Sheriff's Department, the FBI, the CIA, and certain powerful political figures as well.

Answer:  Well, I can only say that it has been a shock every time an agency, an organization, or an individual has faltered or failed in upholding ethics and lawful conduct surrounding this circumstance.  You feel so worried and sorrowful for the nation when this occurs.   Being stalked by a powerful serial killer is an extreme situation, and you survive from one day to the next with the assurance that some good person in benevolent authority is going to call a decisive halt to the predation eventually.  You need that belief in order to endure.

10.  What if you yourself are the benevolent authority?

Answer:  Well, that's an interesting possibility.  Certainly part of this ordeal has involved discovering my own capabilities to protect and defend those I care about.  And I certainly do not want to underestimate the critical importance of expert investigators within the OIG Hotline and the ODNI who have, without question, embodied the benevolent authority which has repeatedly saved our lives.  But yes, it is also necessary to recognize that I have the ability to act powerfully on my own behalf.

11.  What has it meant to you to act powerfully on your own behalf?

Answer:  It means, quite simply, perceiving and wielding the truth.

12.  Why is the truth so powerful in this circumstance?

Answer:  You know, there are always hidden truths within any society.  But the bigger they are, the more entrenched and established and profitable they are for longstanding interests, the more powerful is the revelation of that truth as well.  The first challenge is always to ascertain what the hidden truth is.  The second challenge is to decide whether to speak it.

13.  Why is there a question about whether a hidden truth should be spoken?

Answer:  There are reasons why not every truth can be spoken publicly, and I won't go into them here.  By contrast other truths can be revealed, and to the great good of the society.  So it is necessary to exercise discernment and thoughtfulness at every point.

14.  You have written about certain individuals lately, here and elsewhere, in a manner you have been reluctant to do previously.

Answer:  I'm still reluctant.

15.  Then why have you disclosed certain details previously withheld from the public sphere?

Answer:  Because I felt that I needed to introduce a substantive incentive to allow the provision of the reports to me.  Otherwise, it wasn't going to happen.

I revealed details in a manner that the FBI can still control.  But I need the reports and I'm not willing to tolerate further predation.  And the FBI needs to be clear on these points.

16.  You are not now in a position in which you could speak to any member of the government over the phone.

Answer:  Not prior to receiving the reports without redaction or omission unapproved by the lead investigators.

17.  The FBI is continuing to threaten at least one of your family members with forced job loss.

Answer:  Yes, these threats are coming in from the FBI on a daily basis.  But it would be best for the FBI to withdraw all harms and threats of harm at this time.  I would like to receive the reports and have the chance to evaluate them.  After that, I have stated that I would hear out the myriad perspectives regarding the problem of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, and that I would attend carefully to the points of view expressed.

18.  Has the FBI now withdrawn all plans to falsely claim that your loved ones or you yourself have perpetrated Phoenix Program crimes?

Answer:  Both of my sons were allegedly tortured recently by the FBI when the agency wanted to coerce false witness statements from them regarding my husband.  So, the FBI has been intransigent in the extreme with regard to this objective.  It's astonishing how aggressively they have pursued this scheme.

19.  What is the reason for that persistence?

Answer:  I think the reason is that the FBI is desperately attempting to justify a law enforcement raid that would result in "accidental" violence toward me.  This is likely the most direct route they can think of to silence me as an FBI whistleblower.  And I think the agency is likely feeling a sense of crisis and urgency surrounding the possible exposure of its crimes of falsified reporting.

20.  A revelation of this kind has never been made before?

Answer:  Well, it's important for us to remember the USA gymnasts whose victim statements regarding Larry Nassar were all falsfied by the FBI.  A few of these brave young women testified before Congress and called for an investigation of the FBI on the basis of the malfeasance in their case.

But this is likely the first time that a larger system of falsified law enforcement reporting has been proven by investigators as a systemic, large-scale problem of apparent institutional corruption targeting the law-abiding American public.

21.  So this is potentially transformative.

Answer:  It's important at this juncture to focus on the release of the reports to me as FOIA requester and investigative subject.  Because I'm sure there will be those who are anxious to express themselves to me after I receive this material.  And it's key to convey that they will have the opportunity to speak and be heard.

22.  Do you believe the release of the reports will be accompanied by full disclosure regarding the settlements and penalties awarded in your name?

Answer:  I have expressed to everyone that full disclosure protects the lives of my loved ones, in addition to my own.  So, I think investigators are highly aware of the importance of full disclosure, and I trust that they are motivated to safeguard us in this way.

23. Do you wish to express anything more?

Answer:  My abiding thanks to everyone who is laboring to safely convey the reports into my hands.

24.  Why is it so important to you to thank these people?

Answer:  Because I don't think heroes should go unsung.

25.  Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?

Answer:  I do.

Lane MacWilliams