Rescue

1.  The FBI has recently conveyed to you that others are engaging in entrapment in an attempt to mischaracterize your use of your cell phone.  Can you explain what appears to be going on?

Answer:  Basically, the FBI and its affiliates appear to want to appropriate funds awarded under my name under the auspices of the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.  These are funds about which I have never been informed through investigative reports, which have been improperly withheld from me.  So the agency appears to be attempting to allege wrongful communications with the agency itself through my cell phone in an attempt to justify appropriation of funds.

2. The FBI is not alleging that it is calling you over your cell phone, is it?

Answer:  No, I'm not speaking to the FBI over the phone.  But threats to my family members will sometimes spontaneously appear on my phone during voice-to-text translation that I am dictating, or during a Google search -- or on my computer, under my Amazon feed.  My Xfinity/Comcast account appears to have been utilized in this manner in the past as well.  None of these can be characterized as admissible evidence, because it is not verifiable communication, nor can it be considered reliable communication.  But a portion of FBI threats appear to have been realized, so I try to look for all assertions and sort through the false ones from the those that could possibly be true.

3.  What is the breakdown between true and false allegations that the FBI extends to you?

Answer:  I don't have the means of verifying the FBI's apparent assertions, so I cannot say.  If you asked me my general impressions, I would say that ninety percent of the FBI's assertions to me have been false.  But the remaining ten percent have been truthful and have been devastating to my family.

4.  Can you give us an example of the FBI's threats that have come to pass?

Answer:  Assertions of the specific diseases the FBI has conveyed to my family members.  These have been quite rare in many cases, so the specificity has been important in order for me to attempt to understand the details of our illnesses.  These have been verified in some cases through medical testing.

Assertions of specific FBI harms to our pets, to our properties.

Assertions of the improper recruitment of my sons and MG into a program previously named for the OIG Hotline.

Assertions of the specific false allegations that have been extended about my family by those who have been coerced into providing false witness statements.

5.  Can you give us an example of the FBI's threats that have turned out to be false?

Answer:  The FBI alleged yesterday evening that my sons and MX had been, and were continuing to be, subjected to sexual harassment and abuse according to agency directives.  The agency seemed to allege that the communications devices that had had access to them 24/7 had been utilized to direct them to report to certain locations at certain times for the facilitation of that abuse.

6. You're talking about human trafficking.

Answer:  Honestly, I don't know whether the FBI is alleging human trafficking or forcible rape -- not that there's a difference in a case like this.

7. And you believe those assertions on the part of the FBI are false?

Answer:  I simply don't know, and I don't have a way of verifying whether my loved ones are alright.  So, I try to pass along all threats to the OIG Hotline so that they can sort truth from disinformation.

8.  Now the FBI appears to be alleging that your attending to apparent threats from the FBI is improper?

Answer:  Apparently so.  The agency may be attempting to allege improper communications with the handler the FBI hired to surveil me 24/7, or whoever else has been monitoring my cell phone, my computer use, my Amazon account, etc.

9.  Did the agency originally pay an organized crime boss to be your "handler"?

Answer:  It certainly seems that way to me, but that has not been verified.

10.  You had a blog for a short period of time called "The Godfather Conversations," but you never actually had any conversations with a "godfather," did you?

Answer:  No, I did not.  At least not knowingly.

11.  You're not texting anyone in organized crime who is affiliated with the FBI.

Answer: No, I am not.

12.  You are not emailing anyone in organized crime who controls part of the FBI.

Answer:  Absolutely not.

13.  You are not speaking on the phone to anyone in organized crime who has ties to the FBI.

Answer:  Clearly no.

14.  Do you have the impression that more than one person has been surveilling your cell phone at a time?

Answer:  I do, yes.

15.  So now the agency is attempting to claim that you are complicit with the very people who have victimized you among the agency and its affiliates?

Answer:  This appears to be the case.

16. How could that possibly make sense?

Answer:  I think the FBI and its affiliates are engaging in every effort possible to misappropriate funds awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.  So the agency is seemingly trying to claim that I am a participatory victim.

17.  Are you a participatory victim?

Answer:  Did the Jews volunteer for the Holocaust?  No.  Emphatically and eternally no.

18.  How do you feel about those who are profiteering from your suffering and that of your family?

Answer:  These are devastating crimes.  Absolutely annihilating.  And they are intended to be.  And for the perpetrators to be profiting from them represents a grievous wrong.

19.  On some level, you want to know that there are those who would protect the innocent no matter what financial incentives were being offered to them.  Isn't that so?

Answer:  On every level.  We always want to know that there are those who love truth and justice.  And I do believe that OIG Hotline investigators stand among them, as do I myself.

20.  You have requested that the OIG Hotline check on the welfare of your loved ones.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, I have.

21.  And what is your degree of worry for their welfare at this time?

Answer:  Extremely high.  They appear to have lost personal sovereignty over their lives, and anytime that happens, we need to be extremely worried for the welfare of any individual.

22.  Their communications devices have not been removed?

Answer:  My distinct impression is that they have not.

23.  How can you be sure?

Answer:  I have been giving my older son feedback on his graduate school application essays, which are focused on a scientific field.  And between one draft and the next, his handler apparently directed him to remove all mentions of a phenomenon known as the "Clathrate Gun Hypothesis," which references methane clathrates in the Arctic and has nothing to do with actual weapons whatsoever.  But he had to remove all mentions of this scientific phenomenon in order to avoid false reports that he was writing about weapons, apparently.

24.  And what did you think about that directive?

Answer:  It's entirely dystopian.  Our language is being taken from us, as is our relationship to the truth.

25.  How was your son's application essay following the deletions?

Answer:  Much weaker.  His ideas were not as clearly expressed, and the importance of his undergraduate thesis on this subject was obscured, in my opinion.

26.  So you believe your son is still in active communication with his handler on this basis alone.

Answer:  I believe so, yes.

27.  Will FOIA reports and investigative reports actually be provided to you, or will you continue to be victimized as a family indefinitely?

Answer:  I have no idea.  I believe the Supreme Court has determined that we are to be provided with reports, but I don't believe that will happen until the FBI and its affiliates have taken everything they possibly can from settlements and penalties awarded in my name under the auspices of the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.  At this point, that appears to mean that the FBI is busy accusing us of being in communication with our captors within the agency.

28.  How do you feel about the corruption that has been evidenced by the actions of the FBI in this case?

Answer:  There is no avarice that could ever justify these acts.

29. Can your children be separated from those who have harmed them so mercilessly among the FBI and its affiliates?

Answer:  I don't have that answer.  They themselves have suffered such extensive torture that I'm not sure they could participate in their own rescue at this point.  If you open the door to the cage of a wild rabbit, it will sometimes just cower in the enclosure in shock.  And I think that likely represents the current state of their circumstances.  The harms have simply been too prolonged and too extensive.  

30.  They were treated as expendable sacrifices by those who were profiting from their suffering.

Answer:  As has my whole family.

31.  Now the FBI appears to be telling you to keep quiet about your victimization in the hope that you might survive.

Answer:  The FBI has always wanted its victims to be silent.  That's a fair assertion to make.

32.  But do you have any confidence that FOIA reports or investigative reports will be provided to you?

Answer:  I can only say that I hope the injunctive orders of the Supreme Court will be upheld on an immediate basis.

33.  And what would you say to those who are allegedly attempting to malign you in order to appropriate funds awarded in your name?

Answer:  Don't.

34.  You will not participate in your own defamation for the profit of those who have victimized your family.

Answer:  No.

35.  You and your husband are innocent of all wrongdoing.

Answer:  We are.

36.  Are you exhausted and disillusioned by this harrowing journey?

Answer:  You know, I have a much clearer concept of the weaknesses in humanity which the FBI has learned to capably exploit.  The source of the problem resides within the FBI and the CIA, where these abuses have been allowed to become systematized and institutionalized.

I still believe that good people exist.  I know they do.

37.  How do you know?

Answer:  Because I know myself.  And I know that I still stand for what is honorable and true.

38.  Will you please follow up with us here to let us know how your family members are doing and whether you ever receive reports pertaining to your case?

Answer:  Yes, I will.

39.  Thank you for your insights.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

P.S. -- Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time.  I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation.  Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms.  As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.