1. You voted for President Trump, as you explained earlier today. At the same time, you are a registered Democrat, and you voted for Senator Adam Schiff and Representative Sam Liccardo, all of whom won their election bids. Can you explain who you support and why?
Answer: I did vote for President Trump, and, as I said, I risked being shot for the privilege to do so. I believe he will be tough-minded and assertive regarding our interests, and I believe he will want the United States to emerge from any period of upheaval with as much strength and resilience as possible. We're moving into a period of autocracy both nationally and globally at this time, and President Trump has immense challenges ahead of him. In truth, this may represent the most challenging administrative term any U.S. President has faced in the history of our nation. So, we need to understand that, and we need to offer our support to the man who going to lead us through the shoals. President Trump is quite direct about his objectives for the nation. I believe he genuinely cares about the United States and wants to see us thrive in the future.
2. Do your political views align with Republican views overall?
Answer: I am fiscally conservative and socially progressive.
I believe that deficits do matter, and history has shown that entitlement programs are not particularly sustainable outside of countries that boast very significant energy reserves. Ultimately, there is over-indebtedness and the democracy fails as a result.
I do support birth control, because of social and environmental impacts.
And Project 2025 allows for environmental interventions that will no doubt be important for all of us.
3. You have said that you support President Trump's plan to take firm control of the three-letter agencies.
Answer: He must undertake this control as an effective leader, because the tools being deployed by the agencies at this time are too powerful for him not to attend to the risks. The FBI and the CIA will attempt to control the Presidency if they are allowed to do so. I believe President Trump's understanding of the necessity for a much firmer grasp over the intelligence community is well-founded.
Then, too, he needs the agencies to be loyal to him to the extent that he will not be constantly preoccupied by his own safety concerns or concerns for the safety of his loved ones. The agencies cannot be deeply divided over the next four years. We just cannot afford the political strife. So, there will be some major housecleaning within the ranks, and this is no less than necessary.
4. You have said that you feel President Biden lost control of the Presidency part way through his term. What are the odds that the FBI directed one or more deployments against President Biden that violated his sovereign will?
Answer: One hundred percent. I know of one such deployment that was reported, and which I in turn disclosed to the OIG Hotline. But I think it's likely that a second deployment violating sovereignty also occurred.
5. What does that mean for President Trump?
Answer: It means that he needs to anticipate the modalities being deployed and take certain proactive steps to remain well and healthy and sovereign. From this point forward, every U.S. President will need to guard against his or her sovereign will being co-opted by outside interests. This is a security issue, and it needs to be part of daily security measures ensured by everyone surrounding President Trump.
6. Is it possible that certain incoming members of the administration could already have been co-opted through these modalities?
Answer: Yes, it is. So certain measures need to be undertaken to ensure that our elected leaders are exercising self-determination.
7. Would elected members of government necessarily know if they had been affected?
Answer: No. Certain safeguards should be implemented for all elected officials, and likely all appointed officials as well. Even certain enlisted officials who are in critical roles should be protected in this respect.
8. Is this protocol yet in place?
Answer: No. And it's critically important, in my view.
9. Why?
Answer: Because we want our leaders to be thinking for themselves, not to be marionettes or pawns or automatons or drones. We need to hear their genuine points of view and we need to see them standing up for their beliefs in the public sphere. Otherwise, our governance, like our public, like the whole of humanity, risks being enslaved to a force of will that is not our own.
Our military leaders are subject to the same assaults. So this needs to be confronted effectively and rapidly with protective protocols, in my opinion.
10. How could loved ones ascertain whether these assaults have been perpetrated?
Answer: They would see the individual begin to make completely uncharacteristic decisions. They might notice a marked increase in appetite, which appears to be part of the side-effects with one particular modality. They might notice a pronounced mood lability, a change in sleep patterns, and a certain cynicism, negativity, or anger that may not have been present previously. The individual might have an altered facial expression at times, which is something I've noticed in my sons. They may express that they don't feel like themselves.
11. What do you mean by an altered facial expression?
Answer: This is a qualitative measure, certainly. But an individual may possess a facial expression the loved ones have not seen before, even over many years. They may look altered from a subjective perspective. They may smirk, when in the previous thirty years, they never smirked. They may glower, when in the previous fifty years, they never glowered. This is the best way to describe it.
12. How critical is this subject for the future freedom of mankind?
Answer: It's central. This modality should never have been developed, clearly, and that was a profound error on the part of the Commander in Chief who approved the initiative. But it has been developed, and it has been deployed, and now we need to try to reclaim our sovereignty if we can.
13. Can these invasions of human sovereignty be overcome?
Answer: Absolutely, they can, with leaders who insist on those steps for the public at a certain point. But my argument is that our elected leaders, our appointed officials and some enlisted officials need to be safeguarded now. Right now. No waiting.
14. What about judges at a certain level?
Answer: There, too, we are depending on sovereignty and self-determination. So, absolutely, we need the same safeguards for judges who are making critical decisions for our entire society.
15. What about the National Security Council?
Answer: Absolutely. They, too, require such safeguards.
16. Can you speak more about the methods that could be protective or curative?
Answer: In a secure setting only.
17. You are not able to disclose those methods publicly?
Answer: Not at this time, no. Any disclosure decisions need to be made by President Trump.
18. What kind of prospects do your sons have for complete recovery?
Answer: I don't know. That likelihood is uncharacterized at this time.
19. Do you think of their essential personalities as still being present?
Answer: They are still present, but they seem to be in hibernation.
20. Can they awaken?
Answer: This is the hope.
21. Thank you for sharing your insights with us today.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment