1. You seem to have been warned this morning, at least based on some unusual titles on your Amazon "Recommended Just for You" feed, not to state that there are allegedly extensive funds awarded under your name within the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.
Answer: That's true. One of the most notable titles was Ask Not, which appears to suggest that to ask questions about the disposition of that 7.3 trillion dollars is to ensure my own death and that of my family members as well.
But there was also The Dispossessed and I Surrender All.
2. Do these titles refer to the more than 7.3 trillion dollars awarded in your name pertaining to investigations of your case against the OIG Hotline and the ODNI regarding the FBI's and CIA's perpetration of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public?
Answer: It would appear that they do, yes.
3. Where do you believe these threats are originating?
Answer: Within the agencies themselves. They are the ones with control over my Amazon feed, and they are the ones who are creating the disinformation that would allow the wrongful appropriation of these funds. So, it's the FBI and the CIA themselves, aided and abetted by organized crime on the side of the threats.
4. What threats are accompanying this suggestion that you not make any further reference to these funds?
Answer: Withheld medical care for the myriad illnesses caused to the five of members of my family by the FBI, environmental harms that include ruining our water quality and air quality within our home, home arson, wildfire arson, kidnapping, poisoning, pharmaceutical harms. forced LSD dosing of a particular family member, forced addiction with withheld treatment for a particular family member, alienation of affection from my sons, to whom I was always very close before the FBI darkened our door, the ongoing loss of sovereignty of my sons and MX without recovery for them, widowhood on my part, false law enforcement claims of serial killing on my part or my husband's that seem to reference "a girl who survived" a fictional attack in the woods to render a false witness statement of some kind, and false claims of child abuse that seem to reference "a boy in the basement," as if that's the way we raised our children or as if we were imprisoning some other innocent person in our basement. It's all highly disturbing material.
In addition, there seems to be a suggestion of the CIA's aggregating false witness statements pertaining to a family member's colleagues from Jxxxx.
5. You hope that the Trump administration will not allow the same kind of predation toward your family that President Biden authorized. Is that correct?
Answer: It certainly is. I hope that President Trump will not only disallow this kind of abuse, but will hold President Biden and his administration to a full accounting of its perpetration in the past.
6. You would not tolerate false accusations by the FBI or anyone else of mistreatment of a child, any child, as justification for the FBI or others to appropriate funds intended for the FBI's victims. In fact, you would not tolerate any false accusations toward your husband or yourself.
Answer: No, I would not.
7. You are also not going to tolerate accusations toward your sons or MX, whose defenses have been removed from them entirely as the Biden administration continued to direct them wrongfully.
Answer: No, I will not.
7. Why?
Answer: The FBI's lies -- and the lies of its affiliates -- are all a wrongful justification for murder. And I've been stating this for quite some time now. But falsified law enforcement reporting is not benign. The goal is always gratuitous harm, wrongfully justified and falsely documented. So, this is not something to passively acquiesce to or allow. These are programs of first-degree murder and you need to expose them if you want to survive. It's as simple as that.
8. In fact, the FBI appeared to reference those lies in at least two titles sent to you this morning, didn't it?
Answer: Yes, it did. There was The First Lie Wins and Listen for the Lie.
9. There are segments of the FBI that are likely highly motivated to protect President Biden from revelations surrounding his crimes toward your family. Why is that?
Answer: Because there are a handful of FBI personnel who would like to avoid going to prison over these same issues. These individuals are directly implicated, and they could easily end up with long prison sentences for the gratuitous harms they have caused all five of us.
10. Even so, do you hope that President Trump pursues these people?
Answer: I do, yes. There should be a Special Prosecutor that goes after funds misappropriated by President Biden and his administration and recovers them. And in that process, I think that a number of prominent members of the FBI would also be held to lawful account in this particular case.
11. Do you suspect that others within the Democratic Party benefited by accepting misappropriated funds from awards extended in your name, all the while you and your family were suffering egregious and ongoing harms?
Answer: Oh, yes. I think that corruption extended fairly far into the Democratic Party itself.
12. Specifically, the FBI has appeared to allege that a number of former Democratic presidents accepted funds wrongfully.
Answer: That's correct.
13. You don't necessarily require that this case end up on the front page of the New York Times, but, given the appalling harms suffered by your entire family, you do need outreach from an attorney.
Answer: I certainly do.
14. You cannot proceed with your life in any manner that is normal or tolerable when the FBI is continuing to file knowingly false reports about your family.
Answer: No, it's simply not possible. For example, at this time, I would like to sell my interest in my family home on Cape Cod. But the FBI has threatened that the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program has planted false evidence of capital crimes on that property. So, I have no means to proceed whatsoever. I simply have no avenue forward. And this is just one of many, many instances of the manner in which the FBI has rendered freedom for Americans an ideal of the past.
15. Would you choose to sell your interest in your family property on Cape Cod, which has been in your family for fifty years, if it were not for the FBI?
Answer: Oh, no. I absolutely would not. This is a humble property that my parents loved, and it has a beautiful private beach with a sailboat mooring close to the dock. It's such a beloved place for me that I would absolutely have wished to keep it were it not for the FBI's malevolent predations over time. And again, this pertains to Americans' right to own private property, a right which the FBI has abrogated, and has been allowed to abrogate, much to the detriment of the American people as a whole.
16. You have said previously that the FBI harasses homeowners until they are forced to sell, at which point the agency skims a percentage off of the commission. Is that the case?
Answer: Yes, it appears to be the case, according to the FBI itself. The agency is profiting off of these crimes, and the systems of predation are well-established. And if the FBI cannot force a sale quickly enough for their liking, they will do their best to drive the equity to zero by ensuring that the property is "unsellable," as in this case. So, these actions are deeply, deeply offensive to everything we believe about our Constitutional right to own private property, and the FBI should be sharply rebuked over all of this malfeasance.
17. Doesn't the FBI itself need to purchase your homes after the extensive harms it has caused to your properties?
Answer: It truly does. The agency needs to acknowledge its crimes against us in harming our properties and extend appropriate restitution, and this can only be done through the assistance of a high level attorney.
18. The FBI appears to continue to reference "the couple next door." Do you have any idea what this is about?
Answer: I do not. But it sounds as though the FBI could be pressuring our neighbors Ron and Rhonda Hyver for more knowingly falsified witness statements. My husband and older son took our cat for a walk around the house on a harness yesterday, so perhaps the FBI is attempting to lie about that entirely peaceable and honorable outing on our own property.
19. You hope that President Trump cares sufficiently about your family's plight and that of the sovereignty of all Americans in order to hold President Biden and his criminal cohort within the FBI to account. Is that right?
Answer: Yes, it is. I don't think there's any love lost between President Biden and President Trump. And I think President Trump would elevate his presidency for all time by revealing President Biden's alleged perpetration of the largest theft of public funds in U.S. history, along with, according to the FBI, campaign finance fraud, forgery, and a conspiracy against rights.
So, I think there's a great deal to gain by President Trump in the process of holding President Biden to account.
20. Should the funds stolen by President Biden be recovered?
Answer: Oh, yes. And that trail of dissemination should be followed, so that others within the Democratic Party who accepted funds wrongfully appropriated from accounts in my name within the OIG Hotline and the ODNI are held to account as well.
21. You feel strongly about this because of the fact that your family was being tortured the whole time that certain politicians were stealing funds awarded in your name. Is that true?
Answer: My children were tortured repeatedly and remorselessly over time by the Biden administration. So, yes, I feel strongly about it.
22. Your family needs to recover now, doesn't it? You would like to see President Biden and his criminal FBI cohort held to a full accounting now, wouldn't you? You would like to know that you can now make an active contribution to long term considerations regarding Constitutional reform and the sovereignty of Americans as a whole, wouldn't you?
Answer: Yes, yes, and yes.
23. President Trump's inauguration just occurred yesterday, and you greeted it with high hopes. Will you please keep us up to date on how your family members and you yourself are faring?
Answer: I certainly will.
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. -- Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
No comments:
Post a Comment