1. What are your thoughts regarding the militarization of certain U.S. cities at the current time?
Answer: There are concerns for the territorial integrity of the United States, in truth. The militarization of certain urban areas allows for the planning of a more robust response to violations of our border integrity, and I'm not referencing the border with Mexico over and above others.
2. Can you please be more specific?
Answer: There is a tremendous problem right now regarding the manner in which the Chinese are utilizing container ships in Western ports: San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, Seattle, even Vancouver.
Containers are being used to transport people in significant numbers. Further, there is a constant flow of illicit substances and even illegal weapons trafficking.
And the ports remain completely unregulated.
3. We are not spot checking the contents of container ships?
Answer: Not in any meaningful way, no.
4. What are the risks?
Answer: The Chinese may have plans to utilize unregulated ports to place Chinese military personnel within the territorial borders of the United States and other nations. And these plans are likely coordinated with other foreign adversaries of the United States.
5. Why are we allowing current inflows from the Chinese that run counter to the security interests of the United States?
Answer: The Chinese have us in an economic bind due to the extent of U.S. bonds they own. So they are regularly threatening to crash the bond market if we make moves to regulate the ports, and this is a type of ongoing extortion about which the American public remains uninformed.
6. Are the ports a significant weak point for the United States?
Answer: Highly significant. Yes. And the potentially catastrophic consequences of our continuing to allow the Chinese free control of the flow of people and goods through U.S. ports and the ports of our allies are foreseeable.
This is a sovereignty issue. It cannot wait.
7. What are parallel concerns at this time?
Answer: Right now, there are not active plans to defend San Francisco in the event of a violation of territorial integrity. And a combination of "natural" and "unnatural" disasters could easily result in large migration flows from this area.
This is a significant concern that must be addressed.
In addition, the Chinese have an interest in moving the financial capital of the world away from New York City.
Should the CIA support the perpetration of some type of terrorist event in the city, to be blamed on illegal immigration, together with the liberal politicians who will be governing in the future -- the Chinese could capitalize on financial disruption to effectively establish the yuan as the world's reserve currency.
This is China's goal, and China is supported in its current plans by other foreign adversaries of the United States, Russia foremost among them.
8. So this is an extremely serious matter.
Answer: It is, and we need to ensure that the CIA and its affiliates are not helping the enemies of our national security interests and those opposed to human sovereignty over the long term.
Significant territorial and geopolitical losses are involved in these plans, and, for the sake of our national sovereignty and the security interests of our allies, they must be halted.
9. You have mentioned previously that there is a significant push at this time for "one world government" due to the global environmental crisis together with individuals who wish to exert totalitarian control over human society in the future.
Answer: That's correct.
10. And you have stated your support for the United States to retain its territorial sovereignty in the hope that human sovereignty over the long term can also be rescued.
Answer: I have, yes. The sovereignty of the United States and the future sovereignty of humanity are inextricably linked. If we don't have one, we will not have the other.,
And, clearly, as part of the this, the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court need immediate disclosure regarding certain programs implemented by the FBI and CIA.
11. You have also pointed out that the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court need full disclosure regarding underground and in-mountain military facilities that our own military has constructed over time.
Answer: The U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court need full information pertaining to all facilities constructed by the U.S. military and its contractors not currently in use by our own military personnel, and not intended for use by our own military personnel. That is correct.
12. Is there still time for a meaningful difference to be made?
Answer: Of course, many factors must be understood in balancing the whole. We all want to preserve the planet's environment. But a future reliance on totalitarian governance by our foreign adversaries will not allow for the preservation of the global climate, nor for the sustenance of human sovereignty over the long term.
The United States needs to assume the global leadership role regarding these concerns.
We don't want to sell ourselves short at this juncture, because the costs in terms of the Earth's future and human freedoms are too overwhelming.
13. What leverage do we have?
Answer: We have the truth, which is not being spoken in China or Russia at all.
And the American people, in comprehending the truth, will elect to defend the territorial integrity of our nation, just as they will choose to defend the Constitutional principles on which our nation was founded.
Our people are capable of adapting to new circumstances quickly. But we do need to provide them with their sovereignty when we ask for their support.
14. So the Pandora Program? The Particle Program? Other programs that gratuitously violate the sovereignty of the individual, separate and apart from mission and objectives of the FBI and other agencies?
Answer: These must be withdrawn, and as soon as possible. The American people will rise to meet astonishing challenges, in my opinion. But they need to be asked to do so with respect, with honor and with integrity.
15. What are the risks if we fail to do so?
Answer: The people cannot defend themselves against sovereignty assaults about which they are utterly uninformed.
The risks are the diminishment of human capacities in perpetuity.
The very real threat is, as Shoshana Zuboff referenced in her book, Surveillance Capitalism, a coup from above.
16. What can alter the course we're currently on?
Answer: As I said, the truth can alter the path.
We're all writing our own legacies at this juncture, and by that I mean that history will judge us by our courage and integrity in this moment. No one should count on being able to conceal his or her conduct from the evaluations of history.
The truth is an astonishingly insistent and resilient force for good, even the difficult truth.
So, all of us who still possess the freedom to do so need to muster the courage to illuminate it.
17. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment