1. It is reported that President Trump invited your younger son to a dinner at the White House and then proceeded to explain to him that framing you, his mother, of crimes of which you know nothing would stand as a "patriotic act." Is that your understanding?
Answer: It is, unfortunately. Yes.
2. What are your thoughts about this conduct, please?
Answer: You know, the FBI had already violated my younger son's sovereignty through myriad deployments of the Pandora Program, the Particle Program, the Prometheus Program and others. So, he was not in charge of his own decision-making at that point. Nor is he now.
So, to disable a young man in that manner, and then to direct him to lie about his own mother for profit, knowing that he would be unable to refuse -- these represent extremely serious crimes, obviously.
3. Have you had outreach from an attorney regarding your case and its resolution according to your standards?
Answer: Not as of this time, no.
4. How would you evaluate current risks to your dogs and yourself, given current circumstances?
Answer: I would assess them as quite high. We are experiencing harassment every time I emerge from my hotel room, though my dogs are friendly to everyone and have not caused any harm whatsoever. That said, I'm sure false witness statements are being coerced left and right.
5. The FBI has appeared to suggest that you are to be harmed in some manner tomorrow as the result of one or more false witness statements from your sons, allegedly ordered by President Trump. Is that your impression?
Answer: The FBI is referencing the "billionaire boys' club," so yes, it seems as though attempts to frame me or frame my husband for crimes actually committed by Txx Lxxxx or directed by Txx Lxxxx continue unabated.
6. What is the motive regarding such a crime of framing the innocent?
Answer: Profiteering. Pure and simple. These men are seeking to misappropriate large sums awarded under my name through the auspices of the OIG Hotline, as they have allegedly done before.
7. What do you make of apparent allegations that sums are now being awarded under Macwilliams, with a small "w," or Williams, in order to conceal the scheme from review by the Supreme Court and the United States Congress?
Answer: It seems that these allegations likely represent genuine and intentional malfeasance in an attempt to evade detection by the Executive Branch.
8. Wouldn't Pam Bondi have to be signing off on these schemes as well?
Answer: Without question. Yes, she would.
9. You have stated recently that you would like to contribute to Senator Mark Kelly, Senator Cory Booker and Minority Whip Hakeem Jeffries. Yet, you are being threatened that your checks will be diverted from Canada Post or the United States Postal Service.
Answer: That is true. I will need to photograph the checks and track the mailings, without question.
10. The FBI appears to suggest that both of your sons require disability attorneys at this point because South Bay Chief of Station Txx Lxxxx has injured them both so seriously.
Answer: That is the FBI's contention, and I'm sure it's true. This is the reason I need to be involved in their treatment and recovery, and it is also the reason why no financial settlements whatsoever should be extended to them without my direct involvement.
11. You have tried to continue to help the United States in every way possible, even while the FBI and its affiliates have been persisting in harming your family members and yourself in ways that the American public would no doubt consider an abomination.
Answer: That's true.
12. Why have you made this choice?
Answer: The American people deserve the quality of leadership I am demonstrating. That's why.
13. What would be your response if President Trump's people reached out to you to address your case?
Answer: I would certainly be interested to hear the perspectives of President Trump and his administration regarding my case. One must always listen, and then one must evaluate the actions of all concerned.
14. Your family needs healing at this time. Is that fair to say?
Answer: It is, and I would add that healing is best supported by the truth spoken to one another. In the absence of that reckoning, further harm is rendered highly likely.
15. Will you please keep in close communication with us regarding the wellbeing of your family and your own health as well?
Answer: Of course. Thank you for your concern.
16. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment