Pandora

 Pandora is the name of the CIA program about which the OIG Hotline should request all information possessed by the FBI, in order to provide full documentation to the U.S. Supreme Court and all members of the United States Congress.

This program represents the source of the most serious sovereignty violations being perpetrated against United States citizens currently, and its far-reaching harms are being felt among all U.S. allies.

The scope of the harm to be perpetrated against U.S. citizens through the Pandora program is disproportionate to the harm to other nations, however.  And this imbalance is due to decision-making by Russia as our foreign adversary.

Within a comparatively short period of time, under circumstances in which Pandora has been deployed, affected individuals lose all capability of sovereign decision-making.  This is not solely due to the brain-damaging sequelae of Pandora deployment, but is also due to certain external controls of which it is critical that the OIG Hotline, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the United States Congress now be fully informed.

The Pandora program has been part of the CIA since its founding, and its deployments were utilized in a much broader context, not understood by the United States, during World War II.

Problems with disproportionate deployment of Pandora within the United States at this time pertain to a clear and present risk of the loss of the territorial integrity of the United States as a whole.  The threat of land invasion by our foreign adversaries is greatly heightened by current Pandora deployments, a vulnerability to which the United States military leadership takes serious objection while the CIA pleads relative neutrality.

At risk is not only the sovereignty of the United States, but along with it, the sovereignty of mankind for the foreseeable future.

The subject of defense against Pandora deployment on the part of the public is receiving no media focus whatsoever, given that there remains a threat of Russian nuclear aggression if Pandora is effectively countered.

The task is to make the point that other deployments related to gxxxxxx exxxxxxxxxx and pxxxxx hxxxxx render Pandora deployments utterly unnecessary, and to combine this argument with pragmatic disclosures to the public which advice that certain steps be taken in the interests of individual health.

Those steps include the following:

1.  the role of music in the normalization of human cognitive patterns following Pandora deployment

2.  the role of vibration plates in optimizing neural function within the human brain following Pandora deployment

3.  the role of electrical stimulation devices in the normalization of human cognition following Pandora deployment

4.  the role of heat therapy through sauna exposure in the optimization of cognitive health following Pandora deployment

5.  the role of magnet therapy exposure in the optimization of cognitive health following Pandora deployment

6.  the role of nutritional adjuncts in the preservation of cortical matter under adverse conditions, including Pandora deployment

Specific guidelines should be provided to the American public, and others, as determined appropriate by the U.S. military leadership in defense of the nation's preservation of fundamental sovereignty and security.

To be clear, Pandora deployments and fade deployments are one and the same, constituting assaults on the sovereignty of our nation, alongside the identity, personhood, and self-determination of the individual citizen.

In every respect, individual sovereignty and the national interest can be seen as synonymous.

The capability of the CIA to withdraw Pandora deployments on a broad scale is unknown.

American citizens must continue to think for themselves, to reason independently, to engage in moral decision-making that is based on the ethical compass and inner conscience developed by each individual over a lifetime of complex and deep development of compassion and principle, wisdom and discernment, courage and integrity, love of justice and temperance in its manifestation, and the deepest bonds that inform and enrich the human condition.

Only in this way can the worthiness, the benevolence, and the magnificent potential of the human endeavor be preserved.

Can we accept a rebalancing of human populations with the long term needs of the earth's environment, even as we insist that human sovereignty, together with that of the United States, be preserved as among our most sacred and inviolable gifts?

This is our most urgent mandate, and in its manifestation, we cannot fail.

Lane MacWilliams