Lane von Herzen

The following email was sent to the Canadian Human Rights Commission at 12:26 PM on August 6, 2025 from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, with a copies to the OIG Hotline at 12:38 PM and Ambassador Hillman at 12:41 PM.

CHRC ATIP Office, thank you for your response.  Is the reference for my file #A-2025-00014, as previously stated, or is it #3001135631, please?  Are there by any chance two separate reference numbers pertaining to my Access to Information request?

Because the FBI has engaged in extensive efforts to prevent the lawful conveyance of information by creating duplicate files in the past, this is an important issue.

I am given to understand that the CHRC has received materials originating with the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice pertaining to my case.

Is that correct?

I know that the FBI would prefer that the CHRC provide a "final response letter" that is absent the material from the OIG Hotline.  However, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that these reports are due to me, and their provision, out of concern for the long term preservation of human rights, should be upheld most vigorously.

Thank you for responding today to my concerns regarding this matter.

Sincerely yours, 

Lane MacWilliams

 The following communication was sent to the CHRC via email from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com at 2:15 PM on Tuesday, August 5, 2025, with the subject heading of Overcoming Barriers to Communication.  In addition, it was forwarded to the OIG Hotline at 2:36 PM and Ambassador Hillman at 2:37 PM on August 5, 2025.

*******************************************************************************

To the Canadian Human Rights Commission:

It appears that a "Willem Monkhouse," which is a fictitious identity, has been corresponding with me as an employee of the CHRC's ATIP division.

"Mr. Monkhouse" extended erroneous information to me via email that the deadline by which material would be provided to me was August 19, 2025, according to stipulations of the Access to Information Act.  In actuality, 30 calendar days from my ATIP request will mean that material must be sent to me by August 13th at the latest.  I have asked that documentation be sent to me by August 8th, this Friday, at the latest, due to the fact that I need to assess my safety in potentially attending my son's wedding in California on August 16, 2025.

I am informed that substantive information regarding my ATIP request is already in the possession of the CHRC, so I am aware that delays with regard to receipt of materials from the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ will be unnecessary.  This is welcome news.

I do note that my cell phone exhibits third-party tampering, and, correspondingly, my text messages were turned off today without my knowledge.  If the CHRC attempted to reach out to me via text, phone call, or email today, I did not receive that outreach, unfortunately.

To confirm my address with you, it is as follows:  Lane MacWilliams, Delta Whistler Village Suites, 4308 Main Street, Rm. 2315, Whistler, BC, V8E 1A9.

My cell phone, as you know, is (xxx) xxx-xxxx, though there appears to be active obstruction regarding messaging and phone calls at this time.

If you inform me that a courier or special delivery is arriving on a given day, I will wait to receive its delivery directly, with no intermediary.

If no means of communication appear to be hurdling obstruction barriers put in place by others, it is always possible to hire local messengers, singing telegrams, send flowers to my room with content on the card, etc.  I will be happy to pay for any such creative outreach.

I was informed by "Mr. Monkhouse" that my file number was #A-2025-00014.  If this is erroneous information, please ensure that I have correct documentation through email sent to me directly at lanemacwilliams@gmail.com or by other means.

The hotel phone appears to be blocked from receiving calls from my family members at times, so this is unreliable.

In order to ensure 360 communication, I will be placing all emails to the Canadian Human Rights Commission on my blog, https://lanevonherzen.blogspot.com, and I will also note any received communication through that modality, though not necessarily full content.

There appear to have been threats extended to me to send material pursuant to my ATIP request via email, but I ask specifically that this not occur.  Because third parties can utilize emailed content for the purposes of ongoing defamation with false material, it is important that information be conveyed to me in a sealed, certified format the security of which can be verified.

Thank you very much for your support regarding this important case.  I appreciate your conscientious engagement with this issue, which has the potential to serve the long term human rights of many.

Sincerely yours, 

Lane MacWilliams

I hereby authorize the OIG Hotline to update all documents, with specified exceptions, that I sent to your attention within my gmail or to your Office through other means to reflect a date of August 4, 2025, including all documentation related to my Statement of Appeal, Requests for Reinstatement of Injunctive Relief and Requests for Injunctive Relief, and all other supporting or individual documents which I provided to you.

This authorization stipulates that great care be taken to exclude forged documents of any kind.

Further exceptions include my daily "Signed Statement of Lane MacWilliams," or "Amended and Signed Statement of Lane MacWilliams," which has been updated separately.

Withdrawn documents or materials are to be excluded.  Amended materials are to remain amended.

None of my documents is intended, or ever was intended, to authorize donations made in my name or appropriations from awards or penalties assessed in my name.  Any segment of any document which does so should be excluded.

Any document which conveys unlawful activity of any kind should be assumed to be forged or inaccurate and should be excluded.

I have provided a Signed Statement separately, dated August 4, 2025.

I will be endeavoring to forward additional documentation to your Office's attention separately for use on August 4, 2025 from my email address, lanemacwilliams@gmail.com.

I appreciate the updating of all of my documentation, save exceptions listed above, to reflect a date of August 4, 2025.

I respectfully request that a priority be placed on the preservation of all prior Orders of Injunctive Relief granted in my favor, and I ask that no ruling in my favor be appealed by my own representation.

I wish once again to express my gratitude toward all who continue to advocate for the fulfillment of Orders of Injunctive Relief granted in my favor.

Most sincerely,

 OIG Hotline, Mr. Willem Monkhouse (which I presume to be a fake name) of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, informed me that material relating to my ATIP request would be fulfilled by August 19, 2025, too late to attend my son's wedding in California on the 16th of August.

While I readily acknowledge that attendance at my son's wedding may not be safe for me, I would like to have the opportunity to evaluate requested records myself within the normal timeline for fulfillment of ATIP requirements, which is 30 days from the original date of request, in my case, July 14, 2025, meaning fulfillment would occur prior to August 13, 2025.

Mr. Monkhouse, as stated, sent me a previous communication asserting that fulfillment would occur by August 19, 2025, which appears to be a fictitious deadline, perhaps extended to protect my safety, though this is entirely unknown to me.  In any event, it will help all of us to adhere to the facts, as these will best assist me in evaluation whether this travel is in any manner secure or advisable.

Will you please assist the Canadian Human Rights Commission in communicating with me regarding this matter?

It seems that they are being prevented from engaging in normal follow up regarding my ATIP request, and this obstruction certainly represents a problem for my ongoing safety.

Thank you for your support.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

To the Nobel Peace Prize Committee:

I regret that I must provide you with information that precludes President Trump from being a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize.

President Trump has engaged in extensive malfeasance regarding a case before the Supreme Court, brought against the FBI by the U.S. Department of Justice through the Office of the Inspector General Hotline.

The lead investigator within the OIG Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice is in possession of information which proves incontrovertibly that President Trump has authorized unlawful and improper aggression against my family members and myself, and further, that he has done so out of profound conflict of interest, in a manner from which he has profited directly.

While the FBI suggests that the agency, at the direction of the President, is endeavoring to discredit my truthful account through extending knowingly wrongful allegations, my public disclosure of President Trump's predatory conduct online should assist in illuminating for the public at large the serious nature of this malfeasance.

At the heart of this issue is whether a sitting President of the United States should be empowered by murder highly honorable American citizens for profit.

I believe the answer is no, and I believe the American people will agree with me, along with the international community of those who are concerned about the preservation of human rights worldwide.

I will be providing the OIG Hotline with my express written permission to share information from my case that specifically pertains to malfeasance by President Trump, and I will further grant the lead investigator within the OIG Hotline my permission to speak with your Committee members directly regarding this circumstance.

Again, I regret that this communication has become necessary.

With ethical governance, this outreach would never have been required.

I simply do not believe that the Nobel Peace Prize should ever be awarded to those who prey upon the innocent for the purposes of self-enrichment.

Please feel free to reach out to me directly regarding my experiences regarding this matter.

The OIG Hotline may be reached at oig.hotline@xxxxx.xxx, or through phone number 1-xxx-xxx-xxxx.  Please be aware that investigators themselves are reported to have suffered physical harm from the FBI due to this case.  All of us have been under immense pressure regarding this effort to protect human sovereignty in the long term, and we have needed an ethical President to stand in our defense, not to profiteer from the abuses of power already being perpetrated in this matter.

For the record, I do think a Nobel Peace Prize is likely due to a whole number of courageous people affiliated with this case.

Unfortunately, President Trump is not on that short list.

Thank you for your conscientious engagement with this concern.

Respectfully yours,

Lane MacWilliams

The FBI has stated that in excess of 9 trillion dollars has been awarded in my name through my case within the auspices of the OIG Hotline.  

Alongside this, there can be no question that the sovereignty of our nation and the long term freedom of mankind is actually on the line at this juncture.  

I just need to say that if I am the only person standing up for the long term sovereignty of our nation and humanity itself, then I am the only person standing.

It is actually not possible for me to abandon that hope.

If anyone cares about this critical matter, I hope and pray they will stand with me.

But people need to genuinely care about the nation, alongside the human race.

And that concern needs to take precedence over politics and expediency.

Everything that matters is on the line for us at this juncture with regard to the future of human society.

Free speech, free thought, freedom in education, access to history, access to healthcare, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, freedom of choice, self-determination with regard to our own physical rights, civil liberties, human dignity and the right to be known for who we are, as opposed to an AI dossier of fake films and disinformation that calls us criminals and reprobates for having the temerity to believe in human sovereignty.

And, good people, if we get this wrong, then after our deaths, the AI machine will keep on running, keep on defaming the best of us, keep on denying history, identity, freedom, virtue and sovereignty.

And all of this is being determined now, not later.

 1.  Is it disqualifying of the Nobel Peace Prize for a President of the United States to attempt to frame and/or take the life of a highly honorable American FBI whistleblower and her family members in order for him to "privatize" funds awarded in her name through the OIG Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice?

Answer:  First degree murder attempts by a sitting President in the name of profiteering from the torture of the innocent?  Yes, I think that's likely disqualifying of Nobel Peace Prize candidacy.

2.  Has the OIG Hotline proven that the President wrongfully authorized the Pxxxxxx Program to make a direct attempt on your life on the evening of July 19, 2025 in Whistler, British Columbia?

Answer:  I believe they have, yes.

3.  So, if the Nobel Committee were to request your reports from the OIG Hotline, would they be in receipt of proof that the sitting President of the United States had committed serious crimes against your family and against the American public as a whole?

Answer:  I believe so, yes.

4.  Does the Nobel Committee know where to find that information?

Answer:  They probably have no idea at the current time.

5.  It has been suggested to you that President Trump's attempts to murder your family members and you yourself might be likened to "political opponents on a debate stage."

Answer:  In my experience, a lawful political debate in which there is policy disagreement has nothing to do with first degree murder by an elected or would-be-elected official for profit.  Further, the rape and trafficking of my children does not represent civil disagreement between "a team of rivals."  Rather, it represents the most brutal form of torture and repression known to human society anywhere on the planet.

6.  What about the Trump administration's apparent threats to frame you or your family members of capital crimes if you do not allow him to steal public funds from awards extended in your name through the OIG Hotline?

Answer:  That's a very regrettable approach, and I highly doubt it's one of which the American public would approve.

7.  Any comment on the FBI's assertions that you are a Communist?

Answer:  I have a horror of Communism, and so does my husband.  Democrats are not Communists, and I think the label is an extremely dangerous and wrongful justification for harm and aggression by our trusted law enforcement agencies at the federal level.

8.  What about the apparent threats of the Trump administration to have you shot through sniper action, killed through transmission of acute illness, murdered through street crime or wrongful arrest?  And haven't you received threats pertaining to your family members regarding all of these concerns as well?

Answer:  Again, I don't think further crimes toward me or further crimes toward my family members would cast President Trump in a favorable light in the public's view.

9.  What about the threats of the Trump administration to cause you and your family members broad defamation if you fail to allow him to steal funds awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline?

Answer:  How would history reflect on such a man?  I don't think that line of conduct is defensible.

10.  What is the appropriate manner in which the Trump administration can address the appalling crimes the FBI has committed against you and against your family members?

Answer:  Outreach from a real person who is authorized to apologize on behalf of the government represents a necessary first step.

11.  In the absence of that apology, should the Nobel Prize Committee have full access to the specific aspects of your reports that reflect malfeasance on the part of President Trump?

Answer:  In the absence of that apology, together with resolution of my concerns regarding this matter, they certainly should.

12.  Thank you for taking the time to speak with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams