1. Are FOIA and investigative reports finally going to be provided to you, despite the FBI's profound and ongoing criminality regarding your case?
Answer: I wish I could say that I have received outreach over this matter, but I have not.
2. Yet wasn't there another attempt to traffic your older son yesterday evening?
Answer: There appeared to be, yes.
3. So, who is going to call a halt to the torture of your family members and yourself through the provision of the reports?
Answer: You know, the U.S. Congress needs to insist, together with the support of the Joint Commission, the Supreme Court and the DOJ.
4. Does the FBI continue to ask for monetary concessions from the 8.7 T dollars that have been awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline?
Answer: Yes, it does.
5. And what is your response to the FBI's demand to steal money from its victims?
Answer: My response to the FBI is no. Nothing doing. The FBI alleges that a portion of money misappropriated from accounts in my name have ended up as "gifts" to Vladimir Putin. And that simply represents a disaster for the future of our country. So, we all need to say no to the appalling corruption within this agency, and we need to say it consistently and unequivocally.
6. What is your response to FBI allegations that you have been falsely accused of various crimes to facilitate misappropriation of those funds?
Answer: I had better have been exonerated fully by investigators and I would certainly hope that those misappropriated funds will be refunded in their entirety.
7. What do you say to FBI threats that the agency plans to stage a "gas explosion" at your house, or another "explosion" that would somehow mimic a "natural disaster" such as "landslide," "wildfire," "sinkhole," or "meteor fall"?
Answer: Given this discussion, I don't think those plans will work out for the agency.
6. Are these extraordinary harms being approved by a court-mediated process?
Answer: Not with my knowledge, participation or opportunity to defend myself, no. But in answer to your question, yes, Russian-affiliated organized crime is probably paying off certain judges from funds taken from accounts in my name to dictate improper rulings.
7. So your own funds are being used to bribe individual federal judges?
Answer: This is almost certainly happening, since the FBI has repeatedly alleged its occurrence.
8. Do you think the Supreme Court is convinced of your innocence at this time?
Answer: Yes, but I think the FBI is bribing judges at a lower level with regard to this case.
9. These would be federal judges? State judges?
Answer: I assume they would have to be federal judges, yes.
10. Does the OIG Hotline know that these court processes are transpiring?
Answer: I don't believe so, no.
11. So, the FBI lost this case at the level of the Supreme Court, and now the agency is manipulating lower federal courts to attempt to take your life and those of your family members?
Answer: Yes, this appears to be the dynamic.
12. Can the FBI be prevented from manipulating the judiciary in this manner? Is there a legal way to stop the agency from going to the lower courts?
Answer: I am assuming that the Supreme Court could extend an injunctive order preventing the FBI from taking this case to lower courts. And if so, I would ask that this relief be granted on an emergency basis.
13. Could the Supreme Court require that its own judges review the rulings of the lower courts in order to determine whether those rulings were proper?
Answer: I would hope that they could do so on appeal, yes.
14. Right now, the FBI appears to allege that all of your family members have effectively received the death penalty from corrupted lower court rulings controlled by the FBI and Russian-affiliated organized crime. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, the FBI is certainly making this assertion.
15. Did the FBI trot out those wrongful convictions to prevent the U.S. Congress from insisting today that FOIA reports and investigative reports be provided to you on an urgent basis?
Answer: I don't have that information, but it certainly sounds like the kind of maneuver the FBI would perpetrate.
16. If those convictions can be vacated, can the Congress vote again?
Answer: One can only hope.
17. Did the FBI suggest that the agency condemned your reverend Matt McDermott through a similar corrupted process at a court other than the Supreme Court?
Answer: Yes, the agency has suggested this only recently.
18. Would you ask the Supreme Court to stand in defense of Reverend Matt McDermott in this matter, as well as his family?
Answer: Most emphatically.
19. You have articulated that you believe the separation of Church and State, the safety of our children from human trafficking, the preservation and sanctity of our lands, and the ownership of our intellectual property are necessary for the foundational principles of Americans' freedoms, as well as those of many others, to endure.
Answer: Yes, these are all necessities for our long term freedom on which all Americans can agree. They all relate directly to the sovereignty of our nation, and their intentional destruction by the FBI falls well outside the mission and objectives of the agency.
So, this is the best place for us to start in expressing our unanimous insistence on our national sovereignty.
20. What is your response to the FBI's allegation that your family is suffering numerous environmental harms at night, such as chlorine gas dissemination, aluminum ion dissemination, asbestos dissemination, and other assaults with chemical, radiological and biological contaminants, Dxx deployment, Hxxxx deployment, as well as other types of harms?
Answer: Certainly, I would ask that President Trump disallow all of this aggression on an immediate basis.
21. And with regard to the sniper threats? The threats of staged "street violence"? The threats of staged vehicle accident and myriad other harms? The threats of contracts on your family members and yourself with the Italian mafia? Can President Trump disallow all of those threatened harms as well?
Answer: Absolutely.
22. And would you ask that he do so right away?
Answer: Most certainly.
23. Can the President also require that there be no more break-ins at your properties when you are away from home?
Answer: Yes, he can.
24. And can he require that you and your family members, including your pets, receive expert and restorative medical care on an immediate basis?
Answer: Yes.
25. Yesterday, you proposed a conditional presidential immunity, given extraordinary circumstances in a global context. Did the Supreme Court grant a conditional immunity?
Answer: I do not believe so.
26. Do you understand the perspective of the Supreme Court?
Answer: I do. Sovereignty is such a pivotal requirement for our nation, and we need our leaders to uphold our national sovereignty without fail. So, yes, of course I understand.
27. Yet such a ruling may place you and your family members in extraordinary danger if there are materials responsive to your FOIA request that implicate certain leaders of violating that sovereignty.
Answer: That's true. In that case, the only way forward for us is to expose the sovereignty issues that can be publicly addressed, with the support of the Joint Commission, the Supreme Court, the DOJ, and the U.S. Congress.
28. If you were to receive FOIA materials that addressed sovereignty violations in the areas you have described in this conversation, and you had the support of those you acknowledge here, would you seek to protect the sovereignty of the nation?
Answer: I think it's clear to everyone that I would.
29. Are there other areas in which consensus can be reached regarding both individual and national sovereignty violations that are unacceptable?
Answer: I believe there are.
30. You feel that the United States must assume leadership on the global stage with regard to long term sovereignty issues. Is that correct?
Answer: I do feel that way. If Russia or China are allowed to dictate the future course of humanity, we will all be profoundly diminished in the future, with no free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, right to privacy, right to own private property, or right to own our own intellectual property. And that's just for starters.
For human beings to be diminished in these ways would represent a devastating loss to human civilization. And it would be permanent, with no possibility of reclaiming past freedoms. So, we need to take the leadership role in striving for the long term sovereignty of mankind, and we need to begin by ensuring that our own nation retains its independence, even while Russia and China are attempting to take that self-determination away from us.
31. Thank you for sharing your concerns with us this evening. Please speak with us again about your family's wellbeing and your own under these extraordinary circumstances.
Answer: You are quite welcome. And thank you for your ongoing concern.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment