1. Your older son was, after repeated sovereignty violations, allegedly given an ultimatum by his handler to either cause grievous harm to you within your own home or to cause harm to the public of some kind. Is that your understanding?
Answer: Yes, it is.
2. Did you feel under threat yesterday when your son was in your home?
Answer: I needed to change clothes in a small room with only one exit at one point and there was a stark warning on my phone not to proceed. So, yes, I needed to change my routine in order to accommodate the sovereignty violations of my son.
3. Your son loves you deeply, does he not?
Answer: He does.
4. Could he really cause you harm?
Answer: There's a huge barrier within him to causing me any harm. At the same time, it is necessary to understand how devastatingly destructive sovereignty violations are -- including the rape and trafficking in which the FBI is currently engaging. The fundamental personality of the victim retreats and goes into hibernation in order to survive. And something else much colder and more calculating takes its place. When victims of the FBI are repeatedly harmed, even after promises that they will be rendered safe, they simply lose all hope.
5. Has the FBI threatened to cause your older son a staged suicide?
Answer: Many times.
6. How does your older son seem to you?
Answer: Traumatized. On autopilot. Impassive. Defenseless. Sorrowful. Oppressed. Grief stricken. Shocked. Betrayed by his agency, which is an FBI affiliate.
7. Hasn't the FBI reportedly planned to convey rejections from graduate schools to your son immediately prior to directing him to harm himself or others? As if his directed harm were to be in response to a loss in his personal life?
Answer: Yes, this has been alleged many times. In fact, he should have heard from graduate schools already, as the deadlines are past. So the FBI is just holding back the acceptances/rejections for their own timing and their own purposes.
8. Why is the FBI so afraid of your son?
Answer: My son has a pituitary tumor, which the FBI knows, and instead of allowing him treatment, the FBI directed that he be misdiagnosed with psychiatric illness and placed him on extremely high doses of neuroleptics for sixteen months. Simultaneous to those crimes, the FBI caused my son a great deal of trauma in other ways. So the FBI is quite frightened that my son could tell the truth about what has transpired. This history is certainly condemnatory of the FBI and my son's agency as an FBI affiliate as well.
9. Is there any way in which the FBI can be persuaded to treat your son honorably?
Answer: Only if forced. Honorable treatment by the FBI is not a high likelihood for anyone, but the FBI has really been working overtime in an attempt to destroy my children. I need to add that the FBI has allegedly tortured my minister's children through horrific predation as well. It's as if the agency is uniquely aggressive toward the family members of people it identifies as possessing particular virtue.
10. Why is that? Why does the FBI seem to possess a fulminant hatred of virtuous Americans?
Answer: Again, the FBI is acting, in many respects, as an extension of Vladimir Putin's hatred of the United States. So, we have seen the FBI's participation in the abuse of the USA gymnasts, a tremendously virtuous group of girls and young women. We have seen the FBI's participation in the trafficking of America's youth, whose innocence and virtue the agency should have been upholding, not preying upon. We have seen the FBI despoiling America's natural landscape in ways that have been devastating to the integrity of pristine ecosystems. And we have seen the FBI's targeting of America's churches and America's faithful, in a profoundly dark manifestation of the agency's hatred of virtue.
And none of these assaults have been reflective of the FBI's mission or objectives. They represent harm that is entirely gratuitous and inexcusable.
11. So now the agency is setting out to take the lives of your sons and MX because the agency believes it can be implicated by its actions toward them.
Answer: Well, it can be implicated by its actions toward them. There is no question about this. The agency is acting in its typical cowardly and destructive manner by treating first-degree murder as its go-to-solution for all the problems it has needlessly caused.
12. Who is actually running the FBI at this point?
Answer: Vladimir Putin and Brandan Pesa, as far as I can ascertain.
13. Two men who hate the United States.
Answer: Yes.
14. Yesterday, the FBI appeared to warn you that you should not leave your home, because an Executive Order had been signed to take your life.
Answer: That allegation did appear to be extended, yes.
15. Is the FBI directing orders from the Executive Branch at this time?
Answer: In many cases, yes, it is.
16. In this case?
Answer: Almost certainly.
17. So, we're relying on Congress, the DOJ, and the Supreme Court to address any compromise on the part of the Executive Branch. But what is their position? Are they immune from the FBI pressures you're describing?
Answer: No one is immune. I do think that the revelations concerning the FBI's concealed attempts to deconstruct America's houses of worship clarifies for everybody within government how serious the FBI's corruption actually is. Because the public will never tolerate the FBI's targeting of America's faithful. And our elected officials know this quite well.
17. What needs to happen in order for some critical aspects of your family members' sovereignty, and indeed America's sovereignty, to be reclaimed?
Answer: I need to have direct dialogue with someone within the government who cares about the future of the United States vis a vis the gratuitous harms the FBI is now perpetrating against our nation and against my family.
18. You have felt upset over recent days regarding the FBI's torture of your minister, your minister's children and your own family.
Answer: That is fair to say. Outraged would likely be a better word, but yes, I have felt upset -- on my minister's behalf, on the nation's behalf, and on my family's behalf, and on my own behalf.
19. Isn't the FBI creating AI-generated audio and video to claim that you represent a "danger to national security" in some respect about which you remain uninformed?
Answer: I have no doubt that the agency has used this argument. The truth is that it is the FBI that represents the greatest danger to the national security interest. I, on the other hand, have always placed the nation's interest before my own.
20. There is a great deal of information about the FBI which you are withholding, even without a confidentiality agreement, because of your concern for national security. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is correct. I have respect for the Joint Chiefs, the Committee of 300, the DOJ, the United States Congress, the Presidency, the Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and the American people. And I am never going to diminish that respect when it comes to the future of our nation.
I think that honorable people have a duty to express their righteous indignation over the FBI's targeting of America's churches, synagogues and mosques. And I think virtuous Americans have an obligation to be outraged over the FBI's trafficking of our children.
But that righteous indignation should not be used as an excuse by the FBI to create AI-generated audio and video that falsely justify a death warrant. Those crimes on the agency's part represent the height of dystopian predation.
As soon as a highly honorable citizen exposes the FBI's plan to destroy America's faith communities, the FBI suddenly mischaracterizes them as a danger to public safety? Please.
21. And what about the motive of the FBI to misappropriate funds awarded in your name under the auspices of the OIG Hotline? Is this just one more example of the agency attempting to steal from its victims?
Answer: Yes.
22. Alongside all of the unconscionable crimes of the FBI, the agency has some real objectives that do relate to the nation's concerns. So how do we parse those differences?
Answer: We need a federal law enforcement agency that is not compromised to our foreign adversaries, and that much is clear to us all. Because the harms I have been describing here are gratuitous harms with no relationship to the FBI's mission or objectives whatsoever. When it comes to national security, those upholding it need to demonstrate restraint, stellar judgement, trustworthiness, the height of leadership and a lack of compromise. And we just don't have those qualities within today's FBI. So, unless we address this issue, the United States will suffer much more harm than it ought to experience as a nation.
23. You feel strongly that houses of worship within the United States should have the right to declare themselves sanctuaries, free from informant and secrecy agreements of the FBI and any other government agency.
Answer: That is correct. The FBI should not be demanding denunciations within religious communities, because the effect of that incursion is the destruction of the safety and sovereignty our houses of worship have always enjoyed within the United States. The loss of the separation of Church and State will ultimately criminalize anyone who has a faith in God. The FBI has been prejudicially targeting the faithful, because Vladimir Putin and his cohort cannot tolerate the worship of a Higher Authority. And so all safety in engaging in expressions of faith will soon disappear unless we intervene.
24. If our churches, synagogues and mosques can declare themselves sanctuaries, what would that mean?
Answer: It would mean that ministers would be promising parishioners not to denounce them falsely. And it would mean that parishioners would be promising their ministers and fellow congregants not to denounce them falsely either. It would be a mutual agreement within the community that there would be no acceptance of compensation from the FBI in return for lies about the congregation or minister. And it would mean an agreement within the community to disclose when the FBI was threatening the safety of the congregation or their family members in order to extract false denunciations, in order to maintain safety at all times.
25. Would FBI liaisons be forced to retreat from our churches, synagogues and mosques?
Answer: In the vast majority of cases, yes, this would be necessary. If an FBI agent has a faith, he should be able to attend church on Sundays. But FBI agents should not be surveilling religious communities en masse in order to control liturgies, direct sermons, or demand false witness statements from the faithful. And that's what is currently happening across the nation, much to our diminishment.
26. Is the FBI intentionally mischaracterizing anyone with a faith as delusional, dangerous, or an extremist?
Answer: I believe the agency is pursuing this approach, yes.
27. And the FBI's goal is genuinely that of destroying all communities of faith in the United States?
Answer: There is no question on this point. Yes, the FBI has an objective defined by our foreign adversary Russia of the destruction of all communities of faith within the United States. That's policy, albeit concealed policy. So we need to act right away to preserve the sovereignty of our religious communities and maintain the separation of Church and State.
28. If we do nothing, how soon will people be afraid to go to Church?
Answer: The situation is already frightening. The FBI has been torturing ministers and their family members. If people are not afraid now, they simply don't know what's going on. If we do nothing, the situation will become much worse. Ultimately, all expressions of faith will become criminalized.
29. Can the FBI be separated from its treasonous agenda determined by Russia, our foreign adversary?
Answer: This needs to be determined by Congress. If that separation cannot occur, the FBI can be replaced by an agency with a commitment to hold to mission and objectives.
30. What is your own personal opinion on this question?
Answer: I am looking for signs of remorse from the FBI, accountability from the FBI, humility from the FBI, honorable conduct from the FBI, and I haven't seen them yet. So the jury is still out, but I have profound concerns regarding the institutional culture of the agency and the extent of compromise within its ranks.
The United States cannot maintain any meaningful freedom with an FBI that is committing treasonous acts at the directive of Vladimir Putin or Brandan Pesa.
These men may imagine themselves as "king," but Americans of good faith may feel differently.
And the time has come for us to ask.
31. Thank you for your thoughts this morning.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment