1. Your son has allegedly been directed to drop an Environmental Science Lab class which meets on Thursday mornings. Yet the FBI appears to suggest that he was never registered for this class in the first place. Is this correct?
Answer: The FBI is making some suggestion of an irregularity with regard to his past and current course registrations at DeAnza College, yes. My son is expressing that he was directed to travel to DeAnza today to drop the Thursday Lab class, but the FBI alleges that the intent is quite different.
2. What is the FBI suggesting specifically?
Answer: The FBI appears to be stating that it is going to direct him to engage in some form of "weapons trafficking" on the campus, and simultaneously direct students, professors and administrators to report "suspicious" behavior to campus security, local law enforcement, or the FBI itself.
3. Meanwhile, you have documented that your son's sovereignty has been taken from him this morning through a procedure of some kind performed within apartment #323 Alma Place. That's very close to your son's apartment, is it not?
Answer: Only one or two doors down the hall.
4. Does the building manager Carla know who is renting apartment #323? Would she be able to discuss this rental knowledgeably with OIG Hotline investigators?
Answer: Yes, and yes.
5. Has the FBI set up a fake renter for this apartment?
Answer: Yes, but the rent is allegedly being paid through an account with activity that is unusual and can be traced. And the renter himself has a contract with an FBI affiliate. So, investigators could quickly ascertain the truth of this matter through Carla and the renter of #323.
6. Some within the FBI have suggested that your family continues to be targeted in the worst ways you are experiencing by a leader from the previous administration who was shamed before Congress for his predation toward your family members and yourself. Is that the case?
Answer: There appears to be a concern regarding long term legacy on the part of an elected leader from the last administration. Even though this individual is no longer in power, he appears to be directing segments of the FBI to try to hide his malfeasance by silencing my family.
7. Has Kamala Harris signed onto this plan of predation?
Answer: No, I'm told she has expressly refused to do so.
8. What about President Trump and Elon Musk? What is their stance at the current time? Who approved of the scheme of false reporting at DeAnza College this morning with the apparent intent of taking the life of your older son?
Answer: These are meaningful questions, certainly, and I'm glad you're asking them. My impression is that President Trump has taken a stance against the human trafficking by which my sons and MX have been tortured in the past, so this represents a mitigation of some of the worst kinds of harm that my children have experienced.
9. Have you been asked to remain silent about various programs of harm your family has directly experienced? Have you been asked to "retire"?
Answer: To remain silent while there are ongoing attempts to take the lives of my family members and myself is a non-starter. As long as there are those who are trying to kill my loved ones, concealment is simply not possible. The only reason we're alive is that I have spoken about the unjustifiable harms corrupt FBI staff and affiliates have caused us.
The first change that needs to be made is a withdrawal of all aggression on the part of the FBI and its cohort. After my family's safety has been verifiably established, the FBI can start speaking about its confidentiality needs.
Without this sequence of events, people are simply asking to commit first-degree murder with complete concealment, and even consent on the part of my family as victims.
And that's not going to happen.
10. What do you make of the alleged current plans of arson at your properties, alongside threats of wildfire?
Answer: The FBI has alleged that magnesium sticks or magnesium pellets have been collected in the concealed interior walls and floor spaces of my homes. So, this is fairly specific information, and I believe the threats to be genuine.
11. Under those circumstances, once a fire is burning, it cannot be extinguished. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is. Magnesium will keep burning under many environmental conditions, I'm told. So, if that type of fire is initiated, there is no realistic way of halting it.
12. The FBI seems to have suggested that arson is a means to get you into an ambulance or emergency room to be evaluated for smoke inhalation, and that in that setting, you could easily die of a medical "accident." Isn't that true?
Answer: This appears to be the scheme, yes.
13. And hasn't the FBI already contracted an EMT who does not usually work with the Woodside Fire Protection District in order to perform the deadly harm?
Answer: Two contracted EMT's, I believe, along with a decommissioned emergency vehicle from the Woodside Fire Protection District.
14. So, all of this has been thoroughly planned, it seems.
Answer: It appears so, yes.
15. This seems less about political party per se, and more about the FBI's desire for the money awarded to its victims.
Answer: I think that's an accurate assessment, although there has been some discussion of unelected members of government recently authorizing uniquely predatory plans toward my family.
16. How do you view those allegations?
Answer: Of course, there are concerns anytime unelected, unvetted officials begin acting without sufficient oversight.
17. Why do you feel that way?
Answer: Because they can pursue certain unlawful priorities with impunity, and because they are not accountable to normal structures providing checks and balances to administrative overreach.
18. Individuals in this role can be useful to a government which wishes to dissociate itself from certain plans of rapid administrative change.
Answer: That's true, but such an official cannot continue in the current environment without Congressional and military approval. Civilian authority which acts too imperiously will ultimately be rejected by a military hierarchy in the current climate.
19. Has that point been reached?
Answer: We will see.
20. Given recent events, should Elon Musk be asked to recuse himself regarding all future decisions regarding your family, your friends, your animals and yourself?
Answer: There are some who feel that represents the wisest course, yes.
21. Why?
Answer: I think the feeling is that an unelected, unvetted official should not be directing the military in conduct intended to lead to first-degree murder of an honorable American family for his own profit and advantage.
22. Isn't such an individual wrongfully usurping the role of Commander in Chief in many areas?
Answer: This is the concern. We would never want a President of the United States to be acting in these ways either. But the President has an accountability that others may not. So, we don't want that chain of command to be broken.
23. What is your feeling about President Trump's plan for a military parade on his birthday?
Answer: This signals to the American public, as well as to the wider world, that we are entering into a period of effective martial law, whether announced or unannounced. So, I think it represents an important communication, and I hope the public will be paying close attention.
24. Will you please let us know whether your family's circumstances improve?
Answer: Yes, I will.
25. And will you please let us know whether your family members, your friends, your pets and you yourself are able to reclaim your health and wellbeing, despite the FBI's continuing attempts to engage in falsified law enforcement reporting against all of you?
Answer: Most certainly.
26. Thank you for your insights this afternoon.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment