Freedom Is Not an Afterthought to Human Progress

 1.  Is the FBI committing treason in the theft and sale of American IP to the highest international bidder?

Answer:  That's a question for a judicial process, certainly.  Having said that, we do know that Vladimir Putin is behind the FBI's theft and sale of American IP, and, in fact, the IP of many other nations.  And further, we know that China is actively participating in that process by purchasing valuable information.

2.  What happens to the money when it is received by the FBI?

Answer:  The FBI appears to have a profit-sharing system, in which certain high-ranking officials participate in the "profits" gleaned through human trafficking crimes, drug trafficking crimes, theft and sale of IP, etc.  My understanding is that it works somewhat like a law firm in that the big contributors can work their way up the ladder to earn a percentage of the overall "profits," although that's a terribly offensive word to use when we're talking about crimes of this nature.

3.  Why are you offended by the word "profits"?

Answer:  These are monies that are gleaned from human suffering, so the idea of profiteering off of that human grief is appalling.

4.  Isn't the FBI's attempt to misappropriate funds from settlements extended in your name representative of the same offense?

Answer:  Yes.  The attempt of the FBI to accuse me of crimes I never committed in order to misappropriate settlements intended for the agency's victims represents one of the most cynical, predatory schemes I've ever heard being perpetrated by any government institution anywhere in the world.

5.  Do you feel that the Supreme Court should prevent any further invasion of funds awarded as settlements for the FBI's victims?

Answer:  Overwhelmingly.  

6.  Hasn't the Supreme Court seen evidence that President Biden colluded with at least two others in the planned murder of your entire family?

Answer:  This allegation has been made to me by the FBI, but I have no verification.

7.  And isn't the FBI now suggesting that there are official contracts between an FBI affiliate and the Italian mafia to take all of your family members' lives and your own?

Answer:  Yes, the FBI has made this assertion repeatedly.

8.  What are the odds that the FBI's assertions are true that Elon Musk and President Trump have also approved of your harm in order to profiteer from those same funds awarded in your name?

Answer:  I'm not in a position to comment on hypotheticals.  I will simply say that if the Supreme Court and the DOJ now forbid any further invasions of those funds whatsoever, and in fact insist that any misappropriations be refunded, my family members' lives and my own will be offered significant protection from further harm.

9.  Can the Supreme Court insist on this stipulation?

Answer:  I believe that's possible, yes.

10.  And do you request that injunctive relief on an immediate basis?

Answer:  Yes, I do.  We need to remember the FBI's assertion that a portion of funds misappropriated from DOJ accounts in my name is alleged to have been transferred as "gifts" to Vladimir Putin, a significant foreign adversary of the United States.  So, invasions of DOJ accounts held in my name need to be halted altogether.

11.  If funds in your name continue to be invaded, isn't that process also treasonous if our foreign adversaries may be directly profiting from the National Treasury?

Answer:  It's not only that they may be directly profiting from the National Treasury.  It's that they may be directly profiting from the harm and suffering of honorable Americans.  So, we don't want to be helping those who want to diminish the United States.

12.  What about the FBI's crimes of stealing and selling American IP?  Can you speak to the sovereignty problems present within these acts?

Answer:  Well, they're extensive.  Inventors, scientists, intellectuals, writers, artists and entrepreneurs have wanted to live and work in the United States precisely because of our record of vigorous IP protections and fair judicial process in the face of improper breach of those protections.  

If the FBI is now prejudicially targeting those creators from whom it has stolen IP, with the intent of extending harm to them through false reporting, defamation, forced job loss, arrest or any of a thousand other harms, then the United States will not be able to attract or retain those who have the most to contribute to productive society.

Under those circumstances, the entrepreneurial engine that has driven our economy forward through the entire history of our nation will simply and suddenly collapse.

13.  What do you make of the fact that Project 2025 includes planning to hire many new judges within the first six months of 2025 to handle an anticipated overflow of IP cases?

Answer:  I find that fact problematic.  The planning suggests extensive coordination with our foreign adversaries.

14.  In truth, haven't many new judges already been appointed in the state of California to handle anticipated (and spurious) IP cases regarding Silicon Valley entrepreneurs?

Answer:  The FBI appears to suggest that this has occurred and is currently occurring, yes.

15.  And is the Trump administration supportive of this plan, which is so clearly disloyal to the fundamental interests of the United States?

Answer:  The current administration knows about this plan, yes.  The question is, now that this astonishing problem has been publicly disclosed before the most damaging aspects of its implementation, what stance will the Trump administration take?

16.  Didn't the FBI threaten a wrongful raid on your home address as recently as last night?

Answer:  They did.

17.  What was that about?

Answer:  It seems that there may be journalistic interest in the FBI's theft and sale of Silicon Valley's IP.  So, agency personnel appear to be panicking, and it's likely that our foreign adversaries are panicking right alongside them.

18.  Did the FBI imagine that an unjustified raid on your property could absolve them of their crimes in this area?

Answer:  I think it's primarily about the agency's attempt to get a jump on a false narrative.  The FBI never concedes wrongdoing, so it would appear in this case that there was a thought to deflect blame if possible.

19.  Could the FBI be accelerating plans to harm Silicon Valley entrepreneurs through false charges in advance of the facts emerging in full?

Answer:  I don't believe the agency is quite able to get away with it.  Perhaps with another month of preparation, they could have done so.  But we may be just a hair's breadth on the right side of prevention in this case.

20.  Doesn't the OIG Hotline possess enough details about the FBI's crimes in this area to force a full investigation of the agency's theft and sale of American IP?

Answer:  I believe it does, yes.

And I think it's important to recognize that the FBI alleges that IP has been stolen and sold from other countries' inventors, scientists, and artists as well.  Russia, China, the FBI and the CIA have apparently been working overtime to misappropriate the human capital of Intellectual Property all over the world.  So, I have asked that our allies be notified of this issue so they can take appropriate steps to protect themselves on an immediate basis.

21.  Does the FBI appear to allege that the intelligence agencies of other nations have been co-opted to participate in this plan?

Answer:  The participation of foreign intelligence agencies would be absolutely necessary for theft such as this to be perpetrated on this scale.

22.  What is the appropriate response of the Trump administration to this crisis?  

Answer:  Full disclosure regarding this issue.  There is no other path.

23.  The Supreme Court has appeared to refuse to extend Presidential immunity in this matter.

Answer:  I'm not certain that that question has yet been considered by the Supreme Court.  But I find it unlikely that the Supreme Court would be inclined to grant Presidential immunity in this matter.

24.  Why not?

Answer:  This is a sovereignty issue.  Our elected officials have promised the American people to act in the best interests of the nation and to uphold our Constitution in that process.  And that's not a promise that can be broken.

25.  How serious is this issue for our government?

Answer:  How serious is the sovereignty of the United States for the government?  This is as serious as it gets.

26.  You disclosed this issue because you appeared to receive a nod from the Joint Commission that it was acceptable to do so.

Answer:  That's correct.

27.  The Joint Commission appears to be concerned that our sovereignty is being violated in gratuitous ways that damage the national interest.

Answer:  That's fair to say.

28.  Would you have revealed this matter absent the apparent permission of the Joint Commission?

Answer:  Consensus must be respected at this time.  So, even though I appear to be standing alone in my illumination of this issue at present, there are many others who feel the way I do about this violation of our nation's security interests.

29.  Didn't the FBI claim to have misappropriated your novel-in-progress, paid ghost writers to finish the narrative, and sold it online and in Germany?

Answer:  They did claim to have perpetrated that crime, yes.

30.  Then later, didn't the FBI attempt to accuse you of plagiarizing your own work?

Answer:  The FBI made the claim of a false allegation of plagiarism, yes.

31.  So what would happen if you completed the manuscript and attempted to sell it?

Answer:  The FBI enjoys a certain type of drama.  I think the agency would direct my agent to inform me that the book had been located in published form elsewhere and was worthless as my own literary work.  Probably they would throw a few false allegations of plagiarism into the mix to really cause the maximum distress.

Once you learn the culture of the agency, you can anticipate their thinking.

The agency claims to have sold my affiliated screenplay as well, so one could imagine parallel events through my film agent.

This is the sort of dramatic event they like to stage in the lives of their "targets."

The FBI has a psychopathic culture, which is to say that many agency personnel derive pleasure from causing harm to the virtuous.  They like to inspire despair.  

32.  Aren't you now turning that around on the agency?  Isn't the FBI about to experience exposure regarding some its most treasonous crimes?

Answer:  I will simply say that I don't enjoy causing any kind of distress in others.  But those within the FBI who have preyed upon the innocent are perhaps right to fear the judgment of the American people in this matter.

33.  How would you describe the FBI's theft and sale of American IP?

Answer:  Unconscionable.  Disloyal.  Heedless.  Gratuitous.  Ruinous.  Avaricious.  Malevolent.  Predatory.  Appalling. 

All these words seem appropriate.

34.  Can this scheme be undone at this juncture?

Answer:  Oh, yes,  Yes, it can.  And this conversation is in itself helping to undo it.

35.  Do you feel that the truth of this matter will emerge?

Answer:  The South Bay Chief of Station is going to be forced to reveal the truth of this matter to the Supreme Court.  How public this issue becomes is another matter entirely.  However, I do not believe that our nation will be protected from this scheme of predatory malfeasance until and unless the FBI's crimes in this specific context become better known.

36.  Aren't certain members of Russian-affiliated organized crime particularly close to the South Bay Chief of Station?

Answer:  Yes.

37.  Do you speak on behalf of all Americans when you express that you are deeply offended by the FBI's crimes against the creators and inventors, scientists and engineers, artists and intellectuals, writers and entrepreneurs within the United States?

Answer:  I do.  But I would just like to offer that inventors and creators can overcome this unwarranted assault on their freedom.  By joining together, Americans can reclaim their rightful intellectual property, and in that process, we can show the rest of the world how to reclaim their own.

Empowerment resides in laying the blame squarely with the FBI as perpetrator, and thoroughly investigating the manner in which Russia and China have sought to impoverish the United States and many other nations by appropriating the most valuable expressions of human creativity and innovation.

38.  What does this particular incident say to you about the potential for totalitarian nations to take the main leadership role regarding global concerns in the future?

Answer:  You know, the capability is not there with either Russia or China, nor with any other totalitarian regime.  And the reasons for this are important to understand.  Russia and China have in this case treated human creation as something to be stolen, aggregated and exploited, with no acknowledgement of the creators whatsoever except to wrongfully malign them and persecute them.  

So we can see a fundamental misapprehension of the human condition within these acts.  Creative people are going to create valuable works through the whole of their lives if the society values them, upholds them, and protects them appropriately.  

Creators are the veritable "golden goose."  Only foolish regimes are going to try to steal the golden eggs when it is the golden goose that is that real prize.  And I'm speaking about cultural, artistic, and scientific enrichment, not material wealth.

Wise nations are going to value their creators highly, because they are going to understand that talented and inspired human beings are their greatest gift.

Totalitarian regimes consistently diminish human society, while democratic governments elevate human society.

In the future, we want the latter.  We want advancement, evolution, greater capacity, depth and achievement within human civilization.

And that's why the United States needs to take a leadership position with regard to global concerns.  Freedom is not an afterthought to human progress.  It is a requirement.

39.  Thank you for sharing your insights this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams