UPDATE: The Future of California

UPDATE:  The following document specifies that certain harms to the state of California fall far outside of the FBI's mission and objectives.

***********************************************************************************

1.  You have not written about the Palisades fire in Los Angeles, but the FBI has appeared to state that it had close communication with municipal officials and local fire departments prior to the outbreak of that blaze.  Is that the case?

Answer:  The FBI is currently maintaining close communications with all fire department personnel in the state of California.

2.  Was the Palisades fire much larger and more destructive than it should have been?

Answer:  The FBI appears to claim that it was, yes.  The water supply to fight the fire was insufficient, and the fire fighting response was strangely delayed and uneven.

3.  Was that a "test run" concerning the FBI's plans for wider fires in the state of California?

Answer:  Well, there have been a number of "test runs" for the FBI with regard to fires in California, not least regarding coordination with certain electric utilities.  But the FBI represents a serious threat in this regard to the state of California, and the agency itself appears to acknowledge this.

4.  What are the FBI's plans for San Francisco?

Answer:  Not good, apparently.  The FBI appears to suggest that it has some type of aggression planned toward San Francisco in the summer or autumn of 2025, or soon after.

5.  What type of aggression?

Answer:  The FBI appears to have referenced a non-conventional weapon or radiological weapon that would render the city uninhabitable.  The agency would blame the aggression on a "terrorist action," implicating a foreign adversary and a number of supposed domestic conspirators, and San Francisco, as we know it, would be forever changed.

6.  Why is the FBI so focused on harming the state of California?

Answer:  There appears to be disapproval of California's diversity, resentment of its relative wealth, anger over the fact that certain of its cities have elected to be "sanctuary cities" for immigrants, envy over the success of Silicon Valley and the film industry, and frustration over the fact that California has consistently leaned left in important national elections.

7.  So, is the FBI's plan to grievously harm the state of California a political plan, per se?

Answer:  Well, I think the FBI would need to be closely questioned on this point.  But the FBI appears to currently be planning to depopulate the state through a combination of fires, earthquakes, and non-conventional weapons -- forcing large numbers of people to become displaced over a short period of time.

8.  Is this aligned with the alleged crimes of the FBI in stealing and se‹lling the IP of Silicon Valley companies to foreign adversaries over recent years and then proceeding to open investigations of its victims?

Answer:  This would appear to be a quick way to ruin a critical part of California's economy, yes.

9.  To be clear, does the FBI intend to leave California in an uninhabitable condition?

Answer:  It seems so.  Yes.  The type of weapons that the FBI is considering would not only force the vast majority of the population to leave the state, but would also cause long-lasting damage to California wildlife and the ecosystems on which they depend.

10.  And is this damage completely outside of the FBI's mission and objectives?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  No one has given the FBI permission to despoil the land of the United States of America, and no loyal American wishes to see that happen.

11.  Does the FBI routinely threaten to have your family members who work in California fired from their jobs?

Answer:  Yes, it does.

12.  To what extent is the FBI exerting control over employment decisions within the state of California currently?

Answer:  To a highly significant degree.

13.  And you have mentioned that the FBI is also exerting close control over the graduate school admissions process for one of your immediate family members, too.

Answer:  That is correct.

14.  Didn't the FBI send one of your family members to a football game, asking him to carry a package for the agency, and then later falsely accuse him of being part of a terrorist organization?

Answer:  Yes, an affiliate agency of the FBI, at FBI instruction, appeared to perpetrate all of those crimes against my loved one.

15.  Is the FBI above attempting to wrongfully implicate him of a terrorist action again?

Answer:  Absolutely not.  They're still threatening me that he will be accused of weapons trafficking and/or public violence.  There is no depth to which the FBI will not go regarding its predations in this case.

16.  Are all the lives of your family members still under threat because the FBI is fearful that its crimes of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against your family will be revealed?

Answer:  Yes, but I think the larger reason for the predation is that the FBI would like to misappropriate the settlements and penalties awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.

17.  So, this is primarily about money for the FBI and its close affiliates.

Answer:  That certainly appears to be the FBI's value set, yes.

18.  What needs to happen now that you have documented the FBI's plans to critically harm the state of California and its residents?

Answer:  I would encourage the FBI to drop its plans of further harm toward the state I call my home.  I would like to see an end to the wildfires and arson perpetrated by the FBI in coordination with the Air Force's Hot Shots and local fire departments.  I would like to see the withdrawal of FBI plans of "terrorist activity" within the state, cessation of chemical, radiological and biological harms to the environment within the state, and permanent withdrawal of planned earthquake, landslide, sinkhole and "meteor shower" devastation of the state.  And I would like to see the FBI's IP theft and film piracy, along with its false accusations of the innocent victims of the agency's own crimes in these areas, to cease entirely.

19.  Has the FBI made a mistake in failing to consult you regarding its plans of devastation of the state of California?

Answer:  The FBI may feel that it has made an error in judgement, yes.

20..  Are the FBI's plans of harm toward the state of California part of a kind of far right fantasy of revenge against those it views as "global elites"?

Answer:  You know, I think nihilistic institutional initiatives are often borne of the envy and resentment possessed by a few people.  

The FBI professes to have concerns for the global environmental crisis.  

Yet, that alleged priority stands in complete defiance of a plan to despoil the entire state of California.

So, yes, the FBI wants to take a destroyer's delight in causing gratuitous harm and suffering with regard  to the state as a whole.

21.  If the FBI can throw you or your family members in prison on the way toward destroying the state, will the agency do so?

Answer:  Most certainly, the agency will try.

22.  What is your answer to the FBI's objectives toward your home and the state you love?

Answer:  My answer is no.

23.  The FBI has developed these plans over a long period of time, allegedly ten years or more.

Answer:  My answer is still no.

24.  What does America look like when we give the FBI free rein over important environmental decisions?

Answer:  America looks like this:

America looks like a stag deformed by toxic chemical exposure, with likely impacts that will last over an indefinite number of generations for human beings and wildlife, both.  Is this the result of PBB dissemination on my property, as the FBI has alleged, or any one of ten other chemicals for which the FBI took responsibility?  And why was this dissemination permitted?

We need to ask whether the FBI is worthy of making these determinations for our environment, when those choices will have permanent impacts on where and how Americans live in the future.

25.  Is the FBI worthy of making those decisions?

Answer:  Decidedly not.

26.  What must virtuous people do in the fact of a predatory, malevolent, and even treasonous FBI?

Answer:  They need to calmly explain to the FBI that the agency is out of its depth in many areas, and to reject its gratuitous and ruinous plans for some of our most treasured lands as completely unacceptable.

27.  You are currently explaining those very facts to the FBI regarding your beloved state of California, are you not?

Answer:  I am.  Indeed, I am.

28.  Will the FBI answer you with respect and acknowledgement?

Answer:  It will help the FBI to extend respect where respect is due.  In answer to your question, we will see.

29.  Will you please let us know?

Answer:  I will be most delighted to do so.

Lane MacWilliams