1.  There is interesting reporting that California suffered an increased number of disqualified ballots in the June 2, 2026 election, based partly on allegations that signatures did not match and partly on delayed mail.  May I ask your perspective on this reporting, please?

Answer:  We are aware that the mail has been slowed down over recent years, ostensibly due to the intentional removal of sorting machines.  However, we need to ask questions about the manner in which election mail is being treated at a time when there is a federal push to disqualify all mail-in ballots.

Further, openly disqualified ballots may be dwarfed in significance by ballots disqualified in concealment.

Similar to concerns regarding gerrymandering, we can readily see that the FBI only needs to disqualify a comparatively small number of ballots in key counties to potentially alter the outcome of a national election.

2.  Are "targets of interest" having their ballots disqualified in a concealed manner?

Answer:  They are, yes.  And this represents an immense problem for our national sovereignty.

For reference, I cannot so much as stay in a hotel at this point without having my address falsified by the FBI.

If I take my dogs to a veterinarian, my address is falsified.

Every time, the FBI appears to be claiming that I am engaging in fraudulent misrepresentation, even though the agency itself is inserting all the errors.

But when the San Mateo County Voting Registrar starts to misspell my name, after having spelled it correctly for years, we can see the crossover intent to accuse certain Americans of fraud in their voting records.

And the voters are not being notified of these challenges to their lawful votes, so they have no redress currently.

3.  Are these disqualifications enough to alter elections?

Answer:  That is their intent.  That is their purpose.

The American people would be actively voting, but the democratic process would have been usurped without their knowledge or consent.

4.  There are allegations that the FBI has accelerated the production of knowingly false messages co-opting your name and signature over the last two days.  What is the purpose of this exacerbation, according to your understanding?

Answer:  The FBI always tries to drive people apart by suggesting that they have taken a payoff or caved into corruption or compromise with unethical opponents of the United States.

5.  Have you taken a payoff or caved into corruption or compromise with opponents of the United States?

Answer:  No, I have not.

6.  Do you believe FBI allegations that others have abandoned their own commitments to voting integrity for the United States?

Answer:  No, I do not.

7.  In looking at the entire list of sovereignty risks posed by the FBI's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, how high on the list is the improper disqualification of honorable Americans' votes?

Answer:  We have no national sovereignty without free and fair elections, so this is an urgent priority for the country as a whole.

8.  Is the compromise a prospect, a possibility, or have the problems already fully manifested?

Answer:  Oh, they're here right now.  A certain number of critical votes are being disqualified through a concealed procedure involving misspellings of voters' names and addresses, allowing voting registrars to claim that voters have committed "voter fraud."  

9.  But don't state regulations require that voters be notified if their votes are challenged?

Answer:  They do, but notifications can consist of a postcard that gets lost in the mail, an email that never arrives in an inbox, a phone call with no message.  There are many ways for a county voting registrar to engage in knowingly failed communication.

10.  Can we appropriately consider that people whose votes are being disqualified are at risk in other ways?

Answer:  Any time an honorable person's vote is disqualified, some facet of the government is saying "you don't count, so we're going to erase your participation in democracy."  So, yes, these people are endangered in many other ways.

11.  If we fail to address the voting compromise at this point, will we have another opportunity to do so in the future?

Answer:  The opportunity is now or the opportunity is behind us.  We need to understand that many threats to American sovereignty are aggregating now, not merely this one.  Chances to illuminate the concealed disqualification of Americans' votes can be considered exceedingly important and increasingly rare. 

12.  Can this situation be corrected?

Answer:  Of course it can.  We simply need to have the courage to evaluate the damage to our voting process honestly and completely.

13.  If we cannot undertake this process at this time, what will happen to us?

Answer:  We will cross the rubicon into totalitarian governance.  It's as simple as that.  People will still be performing the rituals of democracy, but the outcomes of elections will be pre-determined.

In other words, we will cease to have representation in government.  The people's concerns will be resolutely ignored, and further, it will become increasingly dangerous to give voice to any concerns about previously democratic procedures in any form.

14.  If we don't address this circumstance openly, will there be any chance that the current situation can be rectified in concealment?

Answer:  No.  Some sophisticated algorithms have been applied to create this problem.  The FBI has placed significant emphasis on election controls through concealed interference.  There is no silence that will be capable of reversing a system that is disqualifying votes of selected members of the American electorate.

15.  You have suggested that certain documentation is necessary in order to provide proof of wrongful attempts to disqualify Americans' votes.

Answer:  Clearly, yes.  The documentation is available, but it needs to be conveyed.

16.  What comments would you make about your security and that of your family members, and even your pets, at this time?

Answer:  It's fair to say that our situation is extremely serious.  My husband is not being allowed by his handler to communicate with me in any form.  My sons and daughter in law are being pressured to sign false witness statements.  And the FBI is causing active harm under the auspices of the Crowne Plaza Hotel at this time.

17.  Should the management of the Crowne Plaza Hotel call an immediate halt to harmful deployments?

Answer:  Immediate is the word, yes.

18.  Will you please remain in close communication with us regarding your health and wellbeing, given these developments?

Answer: Of course.

19.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams