1. What are your thoughts about Pete Buttigieg's recent experience in being falsely accused and his subsequent separation from his family?
Answer: First of all, I would express my sorrow that this occurred. No honorable person should be separated from his or her family due to false accusations.
Second, I would express my surprise that this incident is not more fully understood on the part of our public officials.
2. May I ask you to elaborate?
Answer: This incident appears to have been arranged by the FBI, with the complainant having a history of mental illness that allowed the agency to fairly rapidly discount the legitimacy of the claims.
But the intent was actually to place the former Secretary onto a list of names of those who have been at any time suspected of wrongful conduct toward children. And his name is now on that list, and it will not be coming off.
3. Why won't it be removed from the list of suspects in this regard?
Answer: Because no one's name comes off of those lists. The FBI is working to stringent quotas, which means that the names of the innocent make their way onto those lists, but they do not come off.
Furthermore, those whose names are on those lists have copious AI-generated audio and video created by FBI contractors, all of which implicates them of heinous wrongdoing. And that information is now being coded, aggregated, stored, and disseminated by the data centers we see being constructed in all fifty states.
These honorable Americans have been "selected" as guilty, after which the false evidence is generated about them in abundant measure.
Mr. Buttigieg's ordeal is not over, unfortunately.
On the contrary, it's just beginning.
4. Is there anything Mr. Buttigieg can say to exonerate himself?
Answer: The FBI knows perfectly well that he's not guilty, as I said.
They simply wanted to place his name onto the list of "targets of interest." It is probably believed that he could be an appealing political candidate for national office in the future. So, this is a measure that the FBI likely believes will sideline him.
5. Will it sideline him?
Answer: You know, the FBI has determined that the Democratic Party has no courage to face the scourge of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. So the agency is going to start to deconstruct the Party on that basis. And this is a clear sign that they are initiating that harmful plan. For a former Cabinet Secretary to be treated in this manner is especially ominous.
Will the FBI's conduct sideline him as a future political candidate?
People don't realize that we are heading toward mass arrests based on knowingly false reporting by the FBI.
The agency is simply signaling that no one is off limits with regard to that event horizon.
6. What about the issue of the FBI's compromise of the vote count within the United States?
Answer: The Democratic Party seems to feel that they have come to an understanding with the FBI over this corruption of voting standards.
7. What is your thought about that allegation?
Answer: It will signal the end of the Democratic Party, frankly. Most politicians don't understand the FBI terribly well. The FBI presents itself as a consummate "deal-maker." But there are no deals to be made with people like this regarding free and fair elections. The FBI, in truth, finds the "pantomime" of elections to be a distraction and an annoyance. Ultimately, they don't want to have to go through the motions of supporting even the appearance of a democratic process.
So, for the FBI to be paying off Ken Martin at this juncture is a terrible sign, and it will mark the end of a functioning Democratic Party.
These are the difficult realities.
8. Is Ken Martin trusted by Democrats themselves or is he viewed as compromised by the FBI and its affiliates?
Answer: You're asking an important question that I, as an independent, am not in a position to answer.
What I will say is that the FBI will maintain a priority to keep Democrats out of a majority role on the national stage, and we're going to see that agenda continue for a period of time that is quite determinative regarding the nation's future.
9. Is the Democratic Party allowing its own deconstruction?
Answer: This is a question in which historians will take an avid interest, I'm sure.
What seems clear is that the FBI is paying off key leaders within the Democratic Party and the result is silence about issues that are absolutely critical for the future of American sovereignty.
10. Is there a failure in courage and integrity?
Answer: Courage and integrity are always in short supply, but their absence is keenly felt at inflection points for sovereign nations.
I don't think that anyone currently in Congress should be complaining in the future about election outcomes, targeting of their Party members, arrests of their Party members, false accusations, or draconian sentences, however.
Because they now have an opportunity to address these threats to our national sovereignty, and they're not saying what needs to be said.
11. What about those who allege that winning in the midterms is about campaign finance?
Answer: When the votes of "targets of interest" are being disqualified in a manner that is concealed from the American electorate, elections are no longer about campaign finance.
We have stepped well outside of the bounds of free and fair elections, and without public exposure of this issue, it will not be corrected for any price.
It's simply not a matter of money.
It's a matter of truthfulness.
And honesty cannot be bought.
12. You have also said that it is wrong to believe that conditions will not change prior to the midterm elections in November.
Answer: That's correct. It is unwise to assume that the nation will not experience other stressors prior to November -- and this would consist of an event or events that would allow the FBI to further argue that control over the election process is more necessary than before.
Of course, the FBI is also the cause of those events. But that role is unlikely to be broadly understood.
We need to recognize that we always have a predisposition to believe that tomorrow will pass in a way that's similar to today.
Right now, however, we are entering a period of human history in which that will no longer be true.
13. How do you respond to the FBI's threats that Russia or Iran could use nuclear weapons if the FBI's programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting are exposed?
Answer: That's not going to happen at this point due to the timing of other events involving A. and his cohort.
It's an empty threat at this juncture. That's not to say that we will not face other more regional problems. But nuclear weapons -- no, that's off the table.
14. So, the FBI is lying about this prospect at the current time.
Answer: Yes. In every regard.
15. Is the FBI using this threat as a way to buy compliance in Washington?
Answer: Without question.
16. What would you like to see happen at this point in time regarding an effort to preserve the sovereignty of the nation?
Answer: I would like to be speaking to those who have the security clearances to answer my questions in their entirety, and then I could prioritize the most crucial steps for us.
Complete concealment of falsified reporting and election compromise will result in totalitarian encroachment, and there can be no question about this.
We don't have a way to unmake these dystopian programs, and the profiteering they draw will only become more entrenched with time.
There won't ever come a time when it will be easy to discuss the crimes of the FBI against the American people.
Having said that, those revelations are easier today than they will be tomorrow.
17. You do not have freedom to travel right now because the FBI has wrongfully obtained, on the basis of knowingly false evidence, some type of "death squad sentence" against you. Is that your understanding?
Answer: Yes, it is.
18. What would have to happen in order for that wrongful sentence to be vacated?
Answer: Character and integrity would have to happen. I would have to be in real communication with real people taking real steps to ensure that my safety and security could be reclaimed on an immediate basis.
19. What is your feeling about the fact that this FBI misconduct ever happened in the first place?
Answer: It's a tragedy for the country that no one has demonstrated sufficient strength of character to call a halt to these appalling abuses of power. It truly stands as an utter indictment of those who are responsible for these unjust accusations and the harm that has accompanied them.
20. Will you please remain in close contact with us, given these astonishing events?
Answer: Of course.
21. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment