OIG Hotline, please see a critical email sent to your attention this evening within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com at 5:52 PM, with the subject heading ATTN: OIG Hotline Re: Unconstitutional Deployment Notification, December 20, 2024, Confidential.
Thank you for accessing this information at your earliest possible opportunity.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
1. Why is serial killer Brandan Pesa still asking for a pardon from President Biden?
Answer: I think he's sufficiently ill that he doesn't understand the extent to which the American public will revile him for his acts against the innocent.
2. If his crimes become more widely known, will he receive a pardon?
Answer: Absolutely not. The public will never forgive what this man did to four innocent college students sleeping in their beds in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022.
3. And you do not feel that President Biden will want to be associated with Brandan Pesa publicly, because of the fact that the crime was so notorious.
Answer: A pardon of Brandan Pesa would be a de facto admission that President Biden had approved of the crime in advance, which, by all accounts, he did. For a President who is reported to be concerned about his legacy, I don't think he is going to be willing to risk that overt association through extending a pardon.
4. Would President Biden pardon himself?
Answer: Again, this has never been done before. I do not believe the Supreme Court would view that conduct favorably, given their detailed arguments surrounding Presidential immunity of late. I dont' think the Honorable justices will find that it's a constitutional act.
5. What kind of impact would it have on President Biden's legacy for the public to understand that he authorized the murders of the four innocent college students -- Kaylee Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen, and Xana Kernodle?
Answer: Well, I think the public would see it as I see it, which is that it is indefensible. We cannot have a nation in which our beloved young people are being sacrificed to the sadistic fantasies of a serial killer like Brandan Pesa with compliance from his good friend the President. That is just not a world we want to support, condone or excuse on any level.
6. Is there accountability for these men?
Answer: There is certainly spiritual accountability. In terms of earthly justice, it depends on what the American people demand.
7. How does President Trump feel about these revelations?
Answer: I can only imagine that he would be appalled, and I can only imagine that Congress would be appalled right alongside him.
8. You have said that there was falsified law enforcement reporting against the four victims.
Answer: Yes, there was.
9. Would the Moscow, Idaho police chief be able to testify about this?
Answer: He has resigned at the encouragement of the FBI. But yes, if he's alive, he can testify.
10. The house in which the crime took place was razed. The trial has been moved to a judge the FBI can control. The two surviving housemates have been threatened continuously. Can justice possibly occur for Brian Kohberger?
Answer: I think this constitutes a major question. The FBI knows perfectly well that this young man is innocent, and yet they have continued to prosecute him with willfully fabricated information. I think this represents disgraceful conduct for which the agency should be held fully accountable. This young man's entire life has been derailed over a knowing lie. It's unthinkable.
11. What about the crimes of Brandan Pesa, Tom Lyons and President Biden against your family members and yourself?
Answer: These, too, are unforgivable.
12. What was your response to the letter from the ODNI FOIA Office the other day, suggesting that the ODNI could not find your FOIA request from the autumn of 2022?
Answer: The letter from ODNI was a laughable misrepresentation that was easily undone by sharing it with the OIG Hotline and the Supreme Court. I'm sure the Biden administration was appropriately shame-faced over the attempted deceit.
13. Hasn't the Supreme Court ordered the ODNI to fulfill your 2022 FOIA request?
Answer: Yes, it has.
14. So, was the ODNI trying to get away with a technicality, hoping that you would file a new request, the response to which could be extensively redacted?
Answer: I'm sure that was their gambit, yes.
15. The FBI suggests that, between the ODNI and the OIG Hotline, awards and settlements extended in your name total more than 7.2 trillion dollars. You have now claimed that amount on behalf of all targets of interest nationwide, hopefully preventing others from laying wrongful claims to those funds. Yet at the same time, your lives have continued to be under active threat. Does it seem that the Biden administration intends to kill all of your family and abscond with the funds if he can?
Answer: It does.
16. Is this intent coming from Brandan Pesa first and foremost?
Answer: Yes, I believe so.
17. How can these men be stopped?
Answer: With exposure, always exposure. They're quite cowardly when you begin to tell the truth about them to the public. They truly cannot comprehend the fairness of the truth catching up to them. Brandan Pesa has presumably spent his whole life lying about others for advantage, profit, and dominance. And he has never learned the lesson that some people won't tolerate the disrespect.
18. You yourself will not tolerate the disresepct.
Answer: No, I won't. I'm very sorry this man was abused in his own childhood. He should take the subject up with his parents, and leave my family out of his horrific history.
19. What needs to happen at this juncture?
Answer: First, I need to speak to my sons and MX on an urgent basis to assesss their wellbeing. We need to speak honestly among ourselves about what has transpired, and we need to speak about a plan for healing. They need loving family members surrounding them right now, and they cannot be deprived of this compassion and support.
Second, the lies within the false witness statements need to be acknowledged and retracted on an immediate basis.
Third, all ongoing dialogue with their handlers needs to halt with no possibility of reinstatement. All communications devices need to be permanently removed with no chance of replacement.
Fourth, all FBI claims of "felony" malfeasance designed to disqualify my valid claims should be immediately disqualified.
Fifth, I want outreach from an attorney in compliance with FRCP 23.
This is the beginning of the path forward.
20. Please keep us apprised of how you and your family are faring.
Answer: I will, thank you.
Lane MacWilliams
OIG Hotline, please see my communications sent to your Office's attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. In addition, please reference all other emails sent to your attention recently that you may have missed. I will be updating my communications to your attention throughout the day.
Thank you for accessing these communications as soon as possible.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
1. Your older son has allegedly suffered egregious harm at the directive of his CIA handler and under threat of death, according to FBI information being extended to you at this time. What has happened?
Answer: Well, I think most fundamentally, his sovereignty has been lost. The DoD appears to have recently demanded yet more outrageous false statements concerning my sons' childhoods, and my sons are now sufficiently ill that they have little means of resisting.
They are told by their handlers what to say, where to go, what to do, what to sign their names to, and they are functioning as automatons of corrupt government leaders at the current time.
2. Their life-saving medical care is being withheld from them unless they comply. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, they're being blackmailed.
3. At the order of President Biden?
Answer: Quite so.
4. Is this in retaliation for your exposure of President Biden's a prior approval of the murders of the four college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022?
Answer: Well, I think President Biden likely has many fears surrounding his conduct during his presidency. But certainly, his involvement in the murders in Moscow, Idaho stands as a frightening testament to a leader who has utterly lost his way.
5. What does the President's intent appear to be with regard to his wrongful directives toward your sons at the current time?
Answer: There certainly appears to be an attempt to discredit my family. My younger son is allegedly being forced by Tom Lyons to take illegal drugs under threat of death if he refuses. My older son was allegedly given a harmful "assignment" by the President earlier this week, and now he is suffering greatly, with no ability to talk about what has happened.
6. Was this part of the unconstitutional FBI programs you have discussed previously?
Answer: Yes, it was.
7. How else is the President attempting to discredit your family?
Answer: Well, the false witness statements being coerced from my sons are reportedly very extreme.
8. What falsehoods do they allege?
Answer: I haven't seen them, so I cannot verify. But in the past, DoD personnel have allegedly coerced knowingly false allegations that my sons were abused as children, that they witnessed violence in our family, that my husband or I were involved in the "big three" for the agencies unconstitutional accusations against the public:'"espionage," "terrorism," and/or "capital crimes."
9. Doesn't the FBI strain credulity when it accuses virtuous "targets of interest" of all three of these horrors -- espionage, terrorism, and capital crimes?
Answer: To virtuous citizens, it's immediately possible to see that the likelihood of one person doing all these terrible things is exceptionally low. But the FBI is not experiencing public exposure with these cases. The FBI is simply taking bits and pieces of false information to judges in concealed proceedings, seeking to gain permission to take the lives of those they are falsely accusing, again through concealed means. It's a big racket, and one for which the agency is drawing pay from the national treasury. So, it's extremely serious and the public remains unaware.
10. So, if the FBI can force your sons into falsely alleging that they witnessed any involvement in crimes of which you know nothing, then the agency can take those statements before a judge and ask that they be given dispensation to take your life?
Answer: That is the case, and that's why these false witness statements are so dangerous.
11. Have the FBI and its affiliates directed your own sons to be the ones to perpetrate harm against you based on knowingly false witness statements they themselves signed?
Answer: Allegedly, the agencies have directed both of them to perpetrate harm during our family gathering on Christmas Day.
12. What kind of harm, may I ask?
Answer: The FBI appears to allege that one or more gifts was contaminated with anthrax, suggesting that merely to open the gift would be to expose us to spores that could easily be fatal.
13. Merry Christmas from a faithless FBI!
Answer: Indeed.
As if that weren't enough, there are alleged to be other directed harms as well.
14. Who is devising these horrors? This just appears to be an endless onslaught.
Answer: The FBI alleges that they're coming from President Biden, but it may be that Brandan Pesa is pulling all those strings.
15. Did the Security Council rescind its vote to take the lives of all of your family members, at Brandan Pesa's urging?
Answer: No, they did not.
16. So, then, it would seem as though Brandan Pesa is the problem, would it not?
Answer: It does seem that way, yes.
17, This is a person who doesn't know how to stop aggressing.
Answer: That's right. He has no idea, apparently.
18. Is he directing the specific lies the DoD is forcing your sons to sign in knowingly false witness statements?
Answer: That appears likely. The FBI has stated that he sees his intended first-degree murder of my family as a "killing game." So, I'm sure he's involved with those details. In general, false witness statements from my sons could be seen as a kind of confession on Brandan Pesa's part, because he is likely projecting his own wrongs, as psychopaths often do.
19. Could and should Brandan Pesa have halted this false reporting against you and your family long ago?
Answer: Yes and yes.
20. What has prevented a retraction of false reporting?
Answer: Psychopaths like Brandan Pesa have a desire to "win" through ensuring that others "lose." If he feels that he should be in prison for the capital crimes he committed in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022, for example, he's going to try to put others in prison for capital crimes they did not commit. It's a scapegoating pattern that involves a projection of shame -- very, very distorted psychologically. And he cannot stop.
21. Should a sadistic serial killer be running the country?
Answer: I'm glad you asked, and I think the American people should be allowed to answer.
22. Do you believe Brandan Pesa should be exposed as the serial killer who murdered Kaylee Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, and Madison Mogen? Do you believe he should be prevented from receiving a pardon for those crimes?
Answer: These are important questions. Equally important are questions surrounding the theft of my sons' and MX's sovereignty at this time, given that they are all being threatened by their handlers with imprisonment and death if they do not comply with unjust directives.
23. Is there an attempt to destroy your children? To break their spirits? To ruin their health? Is this what Brandan Pesa, President Biden, Tom Lyons and the FBI are attempting to do in a retaliatory way?
Answer: Without question.
24. Can your children be healed psychologically and emotionally from these terrible predations by Brandan Pesa and others, alongside the physical issues?
Answer: This is entirely unclear. They have been deeply wounded from a spiritual perspective, certainly.
Murderers like Brandan Pesa, Tom Lyons and President Biden actually carry significant guilt. When they come across virtuous people, they want to tear them down in order to assert that nobody stands above anyone else, that nobody is better than anyone else.
But the truth is that these individuals could not persuade my sons to cause harm to anyone without deploying the most extreme means to override their sovereign will.
25. Unconstitutional means.
Answer: Absolutely.
26. So Brandan Pesa would ask you to be silent while he goes about destroying your children for his entertainment, sadistic satisfaction, and sense of dominance in "winning" some delusional game he imagines playing.
Answer: He's playing by himself. Truly. I want no part of evil. I want no part of harm.
27. Would you harm another person if the FBI offered you all the money in the world?
Answer: Never. And this is an important point. There is always the choice to do what is right, even when we are facing powerful predators with no conscience or remorse. We still have a choice as long as we still possess our sovereign will.
When predators such as Brandan Pesa remove the sovereign will of the individual, then there is a significant problem for everyone. The whole society can fall if a malevolent person is given this kind of power. And beyond this, the future freedoms of mankind can be lost.
So we need to pay close attention to the tools they are wielding, and we need to consider their far-reaching effects.
28. What would Brandan Pesa be if the most powerful tools he currently wields were taken away from him?
Answer: Much weaker. If the most damaging tools he possesses were removed from him, the world would be infinitely safer.
29. Could they be removed from him?
Answer: Oh, yes. Quite easily.
30. Will you please keep us apprised of your communications with your children and your husband with regard to their safety and wellbeing?
Answer: Yes, I will.
31. Thank you for your honesty in addressing these ongoing predations against your beloved family members.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to claim that it has wrongfully moved a collections bill, included below, listed in my older son's name into my own name for the purpose of making a wrongful claim on funds awarded under my name through your Office and the ODNI.
If this claim is true, I will simply point out that no honorable citizen can defend against this level of criminality coming from an organization empowered with national security privileges.
It's simply not possible.
If the agency can apparently alter accounts, charge honorable people in absentia, and profit from it all -- completely in secret, with no accountability whatsoever, the public does not stand a chance of redress.
I must wonder how many times is it necessary to prove that the FBI and its affiliates have institutionalized lying about the virtuous American public? It's part of their training. It's part of their mission. And they are using those lies to justify concealed prosecutions, hidden convictions, and unjustifiable harm against the public at large.
I have asked to speak to an attorney in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 pertaining to my case.
Now that I have claimed all funds awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI, there is an obligation to contact me immediately with information pertaining to this matter.
This is not an invitation to the FBI to move debts into my name in order to false allege that I am guilty of a felony.
No, it is not.
This is time for the FBI, the CIA, and all of their affiliates to acknowledge that they have engaged in criminal malfeasance with regard to this case, and that they now need to stop.
Please see my email to your attention regarding this matter within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, sent at 2:50 PM Pacific time today, December 19, 2024.
Thank you for vigorously rebuffing all attempts of the FBI to lie about this matter, and all attempts of the FBI and its affiliates to claim funds that are not rightfully theirs.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. -- Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
OIG Hotline, please see updated communications sent to your Office's attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com at 12:20 PM, 12:45 PM, 12:46 PM, 12:48 PM. 12:49 PM, 12:55 PM, 1:35 PM, 1:50 PM, 1:51 PM, 1:51 PM (separate communications), 1:52 PM.
Thank you for referencing these communications at your earliest convenience.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
OIG Hotline, this communication was sent to the ODNI FOIA Office, and copied to your Office, via email from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com today, December 19, 2024 at 11:49 AM Pacific time. The original email is without redaction, unlike the content below, with the specification that the OIG Hotline is permitted to share the full content of this letter with the Supreme Court, with confidentiality expressed.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
************************************************************************
Dear ODNI FOIA Office:
My FOIA request was extended to you in the autumn of 2022. Your investigations division has been actively investigating the case related to my FOIA request since the autumn of 2023, for over one year. The OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ initiated an investigation of my FOIA case in the summer of 2023 that originally concluded in September of 2023, but has been ongoing.
My case is well known within the ODNI, within Director Haines' Office, and within the White House. ODNI has engaged in active and ongoing dialogue with OIG Hotline investigators within the OIG Hotline in sharing information pertinent to dual investigations of CIA and FBI malfeasance against my family in the United States and overseas as well in the form of the agencies' perpetration of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against law-abiding American citizens.
The CIA has this week engaged in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting connected to a xxxxxxxx trip of my xxxxxxxxx in xxxx, preceded by a prior set of false reports connected to his travel to xxxx the week before.
ODNI is entirely aware of this false reporting, and has been paying close attention to its details, including its components related to AI-generation of falsified video and audio.
My xxxxx xxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx was recruited by CIA-personnel at the request of FBI Station Chief Tom Lyons in an "inter-agency effort" to falsely implicate my family given that I have stood as a whistleblower of FBI malfeasance in the form of its false reporting against honorable American citizens.
My xxxxx xxx has suffered myriad harms as the result of criminal directives by his CIA handler, with at least two attempts to wrongfully implicate him being perpetrated by his handler over the course of the last week. He experienced forcible rape by CIA contractors on July 19 2024 at a location known by CIA personnel in the SF Bay area, referenced as "The Cave."
I'm sorry, but your statement that you do not possess my original FOIA request is not credible. Search your records by my birthdate, please, xxxxx xx, xxxx, and my request and all related information will be available to you.
It is well-known by this time, according to allegations from the FBI itself, that President Biden has engaged in repeated schemes to improperly invade funds awarded in my name through the ODNI and the OIG Hotline, both. And these actions have been attempted while my life has been under active and ongoing threat, as have the lives of my family members.
I recognize that the ODNI is answerable to the White House, but it is also answerable to me as a law-abiding American citizen.
Your claim that you cannot locate my FOIA request lacks all credibility, and stands as a clear ploy on the part of the White House to conceal the ODNI's longstanding investigation of this matter.
The failure to date of the ODNI to provide me with all FOIA materials pursuant to my 2022 request is a derogation of public mission that must now be rectified.
The OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ possesses full knowledge of my original FOIA request of your Office, in addition to a copy of the original request, provided to them in 2022, as does Congress.
If, after locating my materials, you are still confused, I respectfully encourage you to check with the OIG Hotline lead investigator regarding this matter within the DOJ. This individual will be able to enlighten you as to the ODNI investigations team that has been handling this FOIA investigation, and they themselves will be able to fill you in with regard to ODNI findings, settlements, and penalties extended in my name.
This communication will be rendered public, with redactions of my choosing, due to the fundamental deceit underlying the allegation that ODNI is suddenly disoriented surrounding the existence of my 2022 FOIA request. Your Office, and that of the ODNI Hotline, which is copied here, maintains confidentiality restraints due to the sensitivity of the disclosures included herein. However the OIG Hotline has my full permission to disclose this information to the Supreme Court, with confidential procedure.
Having said that, if ODNI engages with me honestly in the future, I will maintain those communications as privileged.
Sincerely yours,
Lane MacWilliams
OIG Hotline, please see the following communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. Please note that my Documentation of Wifi Access was sent to your attention at 12:16 AM and will be updated shortly.
I will be sending further communications to your attention throughout the day, and will appreciate your accessing this information at your earliest convenience.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
To the House Ethics Committee:
Where were you?
Where were you when I had Special Forces on my roof at 3:00 AM because they had been given dispensation to shoot my family at will?
Where were you two nights ago when President Biden ordered that I be "extracted" from my residence because he was allegedly frightened of accountability relating to misappropriated funds awarded in my name?
Where were you when my gas line was sabotaged by FBI contractors?
Where were you when explosives were placed underneath my house by CIA contractors hoping to stage a "natural disaster"?
Where were you when President Biden ordered by older son's handler to twice convey an unwanted weapon into hands over the last week, receiving death threats if he refused?
Where were you when my children were forced into drug trafficking by a corrupt FBI? Human trafficking? Weapons transfer?
Where were you when they were forced repeatedly to sign false witness statements about my family?
Where were you when we suffered from dramatically elevated radiation over the course of years, leading us all to become ill?
Where were you when the FBI utilized non-conventional vectors of disease to cause all of my family members to experience serious decline?
Where were you when my son was kidnapped by FBI contractors?
Where were you when my son was hospitalized because the FBI had rendered him so ill?
Where were you when I begged for my FOIA reports to be fulfilled in defense of our safety and security?
Where were you when my sons were forcibly recruited into the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program?
Where were you when I asked for contact from the OIG Hotline, in accordance with investigative standards of the Department of Justice?
Where were you when I asked for urgent medical care for my family members and myself, given the egregious harms the FBI had perpetrated against us?
Where were you?
My family and I have had our lives on the line every day for years while I begged Congress to act.
Yet today, December 18, 2024, within half an hour of my claiming funds awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI, Congress is said to have opened an ethics investigation into my case.
Members of Congress, I will appreciate your conscientious engagement with my case at this time, with a commitment to protecting my family members' lives and my own under circumstances that have been the most perilous imaginable.
Clearly, it will be best if the House Ethics Committee determines to immediately resolve any ethical lapses that may have occurred on the part of the Congress as I repeatedly sought help and advocacy from its members.
While I am unwilling to tolerate any further false accusations from the FBI and its affiliates of
Today, December 18, 2024, I wrote letters to the OIG Hotline and the ODNI safeguarding reparations for "targets of interest" nationwide by claiming funds awarded in my name. I feel certain you will find that those efforts were appropriate, and, indeed, overdue.
Those claims have been extended and received.
I feel certain they will now receive your fulsome support.
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
Update: The first page of my holographic Will dated December 19, 2024 is included at the end of this post. In the state of California, a holographic Will must be handwritten, dated, signed, and reflective of sound mind and full testamentary capacity. My five page document meets all of these requirements and is legally binding and enforceable. This document remains in my possession.
Lane MacWilliams
********************************************************************************
1. You claimed funds awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI today, December 18, 2024, in emails sent directly to their auspices at 1:06 PM and 1:15 PM. May I ask why you decided to take that step at this juncture?
Answer: The FBI alleges that the Security Council has voted to take my life at the urging of Brandan Pesa, so it seemed that immediate action was necessary.
2. Did Brandan Pesa persuade the Security Council to take all of your family members' lives as well?
Answer: Allegedly he did.
3. Was Mr. Pesa advancing a plan to appropriate funds awarded in your name through his daughter, who is allegedly related to you?
Answer: This is what the FBI claims.
4. Was this scheme discussed among President Biden, Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa in the text thread you have referenced previously?
Answer: Yes, I believe so.
5. So, all three men were planning to profit from your demise and that of all of your possible heirs, save one?
Answer: Apparently.
6. Were members of the Security Council offered a share of those profits?
Answer: That's a reasonable question to be asking at this moment.
7. There is no just reason for the Security Council to seek to take your life and the lives of everyone you love.
Answer: No, there is not.
8. Perhaps Brandan Pesa can return to the Security Council and express that things have changed.
Answer: I hope so.
9. Are you rewriting your holographic will this afternoon, and will you be publishing a segment of it online?
Answer: Yes, and yes.
10. And will this new document ensure that it is no longer profitable for these three men to engage in first degree murder toward you and your loved ones?
Answer: Yes, it will.
11. It is important to you that funds awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI not be misappropriated by the perpetrators who have caused so much harm to honorable Americans. Isn't that so?
Answer: Emphatically.
12. Why do you feel this way?
Answer: I have expressed this before. But it is deeply wrong for perpetrators to take money that has been earned through the suffering of innocents. There is more than an ethical requirement to conduct oneself honorably in this situation, in my opinion. There is a spiritual requirement.
13. What do you feel should happen next?
Answer: I have asked both the OIG Hotline and the ODNI for follow up communication. In addition, it will be appropriate for an attorney to reach out to me in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.
14. Do you feel that your sons and MX are safer after you publicly identified them on your blog this morning?
Answer: I believe the immediate threat was averted. And now, with these new developments, I hope much more substantive progress can be made toward re-establishing the security of my whole family, MX among us.
15. Will you please follow up with us to inform us of your safety, your security, and your progress?
Answer: Yes, of course, I will.
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
OIG Hotline, I am being threatened this morning with the dissemination to my sons, MX, my husband and myself of a "hxxxxx pathogen," a "cxxxxxx virus," with 100% fatality, by the authorization of President Biden.
Allegedly, he and Brandan Pesa are particularly upset by my revelations that Brandan Pesa is the murderer of the four innocent college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022, and further, that President Biden authorized this heinous crime as part of the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program prior to its commission.
The FBI appears to allege that my sons and MX may know or will know of the transmission of the aforementioned dxxxxxxx virus, and will be compelled to file knowingly false witness statements, demanded by the DoD, also allegedly at the directive of President Biden, against my husband and myself, intended to justify our further harm. The FBI appears to allege that it is only through supplying these lies that my sons and MX will be allowed to access a cure for their medical condition, imposed upon them, as have been so many other illnesses, by the government.
I must state the obvious here, which is that it is the secrecy of these acts that has allowed them to continue.
The future freedoms of mankind, so necessary for our development to our full potential, are dependent upon a government with a commitment to truthfulness and benevolence, not deceit and harm.
My argument pertaining to human sovereignty has always been this: Americans belong to themselves, not to the government. They are not slaves, automatons, robots, pawns, puppets, drones, conscripts, soldiers, or serfs.
They are sovereign individuals, possessing of free will, free thought, free determination, and free action. And that freedom shall not be arbitrarily taken from them by predatory arms of the government.
Therefore, I name my children here, claiming them as private citizens whose "recruitment" into the FBI, in the case of my younger son and MX, and the CIA, in the case of my older son, was unethical, illegal, unconstitutional, and unenforceable in a court of law.
Graham Tate MacWilliams, Birthdate August 27, 1993 (Recruited through coercion into the CIA as a paid informant, with the initial objective of falsely reporting about his parents and his brother, with the agency's intent to cause his family grievous harm. Unwillingly recruited into the Pxxxxxx Program, an assassin initiative targeting American civilians, affiliated with the DoD.)
Duncan Sayer MacWilliams, Birthdate March 17, 1997 (Recruited through coercion into the FBI as a paid informant, with the initial objective of falsely reporting about his parents and his brother, with the agency's intent to cause his family grievous harm. Unwillingly recruited into the Pxxxxxx Program, an assassin initiative targeting American civilians, affiliated with the DoD.)
Fiancee, Mary Grinnell. (Recruited through coercion into the FBI as a paid informant. Pxxxxxx Program status unknown.)
While my sons may express a preference not to be named publicly, I hereby decline their request.
They are my children. I have the right to name them, and I hereby exercise that right.
I also exercise my right as a highly honorable whistleblower to demand that the President cease and desist all communications to my children and MX, assignments to my children and MX, directives to my children and MX, and diseases and other harms to my children and MX.
The government owes my children and MX the full restoration of their health on an immediate basis, as it does my husband and myself.
I will not be silenced by a corrupt President Biden, a corrupt mob boss Brandan Pesa, and a corrupt FBI station chief Tom Lyons into acquiescing to their violence against the American public, nor their allegedly ongoing theft of funds awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.
I disapprove of all attempts to mischaracterize me or my husband as standing in violation of the law, and I once again ask for compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 in establishing immediate contact with an attorney now representing my case.
Delays in doing so are placing all of our lives at heedless risk. The DOJ must adhere to investigative standards in engaging in proper outreach at this time, as must my representation.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. -- Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
OIG Hotline, please see the following communications, sent to your Office's attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. I will send further email updates throughout the day today, and I respectfully request that you access this information as soon as possible.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
OIG Hotline, significant threats I am receiving from the FBI at this time appear to pertain to death threats to my family members and myself, to false claims about my family members and myself, to arson, to various health harms, and to further damage to my property.
Beyond this, the FBI appears to suggest that President Biden directed that a concealed court process be undertaken due to certain information about which I wrote, all of which was publicly available or deducible, regarding October 7, 2022. The FBI alleges that permission was granted from a court to take my life on the basis of my blog post alone. As a result, my post President Biden's Lamentable Abdication of the Presidency has now been redacted.
I would respectfully request that all approvals of further harm toward my family and myself be immediately withdrawn.
I believe the real issue is that the President does not wish the public to know that he approved of the murders of four college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022, and further, that he is now considering pardoning the perpetrator and himself for those heinous acts.
I have requested lawful and peaceable outreach from an attorney in accordance with FRCP 23, given that the indefensible harms to my family members and myself are related to the Moscow, Idaho crimes.
Perhaps the President can now support the upholding of the rule of law in this regard.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
1. How do you feel about the prospect of President Biden pardoning himself for having authorized the quadruple murders of the college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022?
Answer: I'm not in favor of it. I don't think a President should have the capacity to pardon himself, as I think the potential for abuse of the powers of high elected office are just too overwhelming. To put it in perspective, the deliberations of the Supreme Court regarding Presidential immunity would have no meaning if a President were able to pardon himself. There would be no circumstances under which a President could be held accountable ever. I don't believe the Highest Court will find that a President pardoning himself is a Constitutional act.
2. Would the public ever forgive President Biden for having authorized the murders of four innocent college students in their beds on November 13, 2022?
Answer: Absolutely not. There is no world in which the public would forgive a Presidential directive of that nature.
3. President Biden is presumably aware of that fact. Is that the reason why he is targeting your family members with particular focus this week?
Answer: I believe it is, yes. He has allegedly ordered that my older son, under threat of death from his handler, risk weapons charges, that my younger son, under threat of death from his handler, risk murder charges, and that another family member face false charges of espionage or terrorism.
4. Wasn't there an attempt on the part of corrupt FBI agent Tom Lyons to direct your younger son to use illegal drugs, under threat to his life, and then to charge him for those directed actions?
Answer: All of these intended charges fit that pattern, so I would not be at all surprised if Tom Lyons was pursuing that objective at the President's authorization.
5. President Biden, Tom Lyons, and Brandan Pesa appear determined not to allow an attorney to engage in lawful outreach to you in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Is that your impression?
Answer: It is, yes. I don't think they are capable of allowing that honorable communication to occur.
6. Why not?
Answer: Because they would be implicating themselves of heinous crimes against my family and others, and they simply do not wish to face public censure over their crimes against the innocent.
7. So, if attorney outreach is prohibited by these three men, what will you do? Will you continue to explain that President Biden wrongfully authorized the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, and that they were perpetrated by organized crime boss Brandan Pesa?
Answer: I really don't have a choice in the matter. If these men are unwilling to acknowledge their crimes against my family through the lawful outreach of an attorney fulfilling Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, then there is no shared basis of understanding about what has transpired here and what should happen next.
8. May I ask you to express in your own words what has happened here and what should happen next?
Answer: Absolutely, you may. I stand as a whistleblower of the FBI's perpetration of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the American public. Following my revelations about the crimes of this agency against my family, President Biden authorized the coerced recruitment of both of my sons and my youngest son's girlfriend as confidential informants for the express purpose of extracting knowingly false witness statements from them that were intended to result in the loss of my life. Subsequent to their forced recruitment, they experienced torture in various forms intended to ensure their complete capitulation to demands for false reporting. The government has written false accusations, to which my sons and MX have been forced to attest, covering every kind of crime imaginable, all the while my husband and I are highly honorable people.
Knowing that I am highly honorable, President Biden authorized investigations into my case, awarded large amounts of funds in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI, and then -- according to FBI allegations -- at some time later, began to wrongfully invade those funds and distribute them to his political allies, his family and his friends.
9. What has been the total amount awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI, according to the FBI?
Answer: According to the FBI, several months ago, it was in excess of 6.5 trillion dollars.
10. What is it now?
Answer: According to the FBI, it is now in excess of 7 trillion dollars.
11. And you have had no notification of any awards in your name whatsoever, because President Biden has prevented it?
Answer: President Biden has prevented it all the while he, Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa have sought to take my life and my family members' lives.
12. And this is documented in a text conversation among these three men that has been entered into evidence before the Supreme Court?
Answer: This is the FBI's assertion, yes.
13. And you feel confident enough in that assertion to publish it here.
Answer: I do. I think the FBI knows the truth of this matter, and I think that evidence exists.
14. Do you think President Biden should be allowed to pardon Brandan Pesa for his crimes against your family and against you yourself?
Answer: Without lawful outreach to me as the victim of the crimes of these three men, nobody should be receiving a pardon. Nobody should be conducting a secret trial regarding this matter. And no one should believe that I am sanguine about the injustices that have been perpetrated against my family members and others.
15. Do you believe that President Biden can be held to account for his crimes against your family and against the American people as a whole? The FBI has conveyed that he is guilty of defrauding the U.S. government, perpetrating election fraud, committing forgery, and engaging in a conspiracy against rights.
Answer: The answer depends upon President Trump and the Republican-led Congress. Will they wish to investigate the crimes committed by President Biden in this case? The American people, and I count myself foremost among them, can only hope so.
16. Brandan Pesa has suggested that he would like to bribe Republican officials and keep preying upon you and your family in further years. Do you have any response to this?
Answer: I cannot survive that. I look like I've been in a concentration camp at this point, with all of the diseases and parasites the FBI has conveyed to me through non-conventional means. I'm quite physically depleted because of the crimes of these men. And beyond this, I am a profoundly good person who needs to have honest interactions with others. I am a leader, but I have been unjustly isolated due to the fact that I just don't feel that I can interact with people who could be tortured to provide false statements about me afterwards, It's been difficult enough with my own sons, whose freedom has been stolen from them in every conceivable way.
17. Your family life has been decimated by Brandan Pesa, President Biden and Tom Lyons. Your health has been taken from all of you. And your social interactions, which have always thrived, have become impossible because these men are willing to torture and coerce everyone you interact with for lies about your words and conduct.
Answer: Well said.
18. Meanwhile, they are profiteering from your suffering.
Answer: According to the FBI, they are profiteering to historic proportions.
19. Do you have any response to that?
Answer: Angels fear to tread. There is a Higher Authority, and I think that anyone who appropriates blood money earned from the suffering of innocents is in terrible trouble.
20. How can earthly justice be achieved?
Answer: The Supreme Court and the DOJ need to ensure that judicial and investigative standards, long overlooked in this case, are enforced. The Republicans need to come to our aid. And those Democrats who have not taken bribes need to stand for us as well. But this is truly a question of whether public officials care about the future of the nation at all, or only care to benefit themselves while harming the virtuous.
Think of those four innocent college students and their families. Now think about the fact that our tax dollars paid for that crime. Now consider that an innocent person is wrongfully on trial for his life due to a deceitful prosecution by the FBI.
What do you think the future of a society will be that allows those distortions to occur without redress?
21. Dystopian.
Answer: Dystopian, yes. That's correct. That's where we're headed unless public officials decide they have the courage to address the issue of falsified law enforcement reporting pertaining to its long term impacts on mankind.
22. This morning you revealed that the FBI has participated in programs of harm against the public relating to school shootings and other public harm.
Answer: Yes, I did.
23. How could President Biden have authorized these acts?
Answer: You know, this is a worthy question. It deserves a worthy answer. The FBI and its affiliates within the CIA and elsewhere have been highly interested in the militarization of the public through various methods of control that exceed blackmail and threats of violence and venture into the realm of psychological operations (psy ops) techniques that violate personal sovereignty and decision-making.
So the public has become a whole laboratory of "non-investigative subjects" for these agencies, and the results, for the electorate as a whole, have been predictably disastrous.
24. What counters the lies and harms of these agencies most effectively?
Answer: Exposure, exposure, exposure. We may have lost a great deal of the architecture of unbiased investigative journalism in this country, but individuals can write about their experiences in the hope of making a difference.
25. You are unwilling to be silent unless you receive lawful outreach from an attorney in accordance with FRCP 23.
Answer: Silence is a quick route to demise with the corrupt intelligence agencies, the FBI and the CIA foremost among them. If you don't have an agreement with them, you don't have an agreement with them. Even then, they prey on many of their own people.
Having said all of that, there are professional and peaceable ways of addressing confidential information, so it's unfortunate that the FBI hasn't demonstrated to me yet that they know what any of them are.
If the FBI and the CIA were truly interested in national security, they would have a lawyer reach out to me immediately to express certain classifications and demarcations.
In light of their failure to do that, I'm not convinced they have any concern for the nation whatsoever.
26. Is it possible that the FBI simply consists of murderers with a laundry list of excuses?
Answer: Defamers, slanderers, thieves, human traffickers, drug traffickers, stalkers, murderers. Oh, yes. It's more than possible.
27. The worst of our country.
Answer: The worst of humanity. Yes. This is what I have seen represented by those manifesting the "target of interest" program and related initiatives within the FBI and CIA.
28. It's quite an indictment of those we have entrusted to defend the Constitution and the freedoms of those who rely on it.
Answer: I have no doubt that there are virtuous people within these agencies. But I think they're lonely, alarmed, and careful. These are fundamentally totalitarian institutions, and good people are going to be extremely cautious in that setting.
It's important to remember that America consists of many virtuous people, however. They may be uninformed, but they're thoughtful, kind, compassionate people who engage truthfully and honestly with one another in all circumstances.
29. The FBI does not characterize our whole nation, in other words.
Answer: No, it does not. Our capacities as human beings are so much greater than the FBI's limitations.
30. Please keep us apprised of the wellbeing of your family members and yourself.
Answer: Thank you. I most certainly will.
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
OIG Hotline, please see an important new email sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, with the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Injunctive Relief Re: Violations of Right to Privacy by FBI and FBI Affiliate Initiatives Pertaining to the Unwanted Placement of Weapons in the Hands of the American Public, Part #45, December 17, 2024, Confidential, sent at 10:23 AM today, December 17, 2024.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
OIG Hotline, sometimes the most powerful statement is a question.
Here is mine:
Has President Biden ever authorized the improper conveyance of any item into the possession of my older son against his will?
I ask this only because I am told that Special Forces contractors who trespassed on my property on the night of December 16, 2024, placing my life at risk, allegedly retrieved an item that was concealed somewhere on my 3 1/2 acre parcel without my knowledge or consent at government directive.
These are unusual assertions, and I would like to know exactly what the President has in mind in this regard.
President Biden? Please explain, Sir.
OIG Hotline, please note that my older son is not suicidal, drug addicted or accident prone, and has no risk factors for physical illness, cognitive decline, medical accident, vehicle accident or law enforcement encounter.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
OIG Hotline, please see the following communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. I will be forwarding additional documentation to your Office's attention throughout the day.
Please access this information at your earliest convenience.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
Update: The name of a medical center has been removed from Question #18.
***********************************************************************************
1. What does it mean that you are now telling the truth publicly and daily about President Biden's authorization of the quadruple murder of the college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022?
Answer: It means that I require lawful and honorable outreach to me in accordance with FRCP 23 on an immediate basis. These matters are related. They should all be discussed in the appropriate setting with highly able attorneys.
2. Is the White House interested in realigning with the rule of law?
Answer: It's important to understand that the falsified law enforcement reporting that was associated with the Patriot Act and the Espionage Act in order to wrongfully justify the murders of those innocent college students is spoken of, behind closed doors, as "the rule of law."
3. The four college students in Moscow, Idaho were "targets of interest" under the FBI's unconstitutional program?
Answer: Yes, they were. The two surviving roommates were FBI informants who had been pressured to provide false witness statements to their handlers, without realizing what the devastating consequences of those lies would be. If you recall, the local police department, immediately following the crimes, described the killings to the public as "targeted." When the public wanted to know how the police department had made that assessment, they retracted their previous statement. In actuality, the local police department knew the killings were targeted, because they had a file of false reporting on all four of these students.
4. Didn't the two surviving roommates not leave their rooms until quite a bit later, after the crimes had occurred?
Answer: Their handlers told them to remain in their rooms until the crime scene was somewhat staged following the crimes themselves. They complied.
5. How could President Biden ever have authorized such a heinous crime against innocents?
Answer: That's an appropriate question to be asking. How could that authorization have occurred?
6. What are we to make of the fact that the FBI filmed the crimes themselves?
Answer: Obviously, the documentation of these crimes was intended to terrorize those within the three-letter agencies who had access to that material. The FBI leadership is utilizing such images as warnings to anyone who would step out of line in terms of what could happen to their loved ones or to them directly. should they object. It stands as a kind of trophy killing which enforces the silence of everyone who knows the details of the perpetration of these crimes.
7. So, when the FBI told the poor families who among their children had fought back ...?
Answer: Those FBI officials had seen the whole crime in real time. They knew exactly how it unfolded.
8. Did the President see the videotape?
Answer: The FBI conveys that he did.
8. Would you like to make a statement about the fact that this crime occurred?
Answer: I would, yes. I would like to point out that our children are not "targets" in a violent video game directed by the FBI. They are not automatons, mock-ups, puppets, mannequins, props, actors or effigies. They are human beings, beloved and upheld by us, and, we would hope, beloved and upheld by the entire society. When innocents are sadistically murdered in this manner, with the authorization of the FBI and the President, we have experienced a fundamental failure in governance that is so profound as to draw into question the endurance of the very foundations on which our country was founded.
Lincoln expressed this so beautifully in his Gettysburg Address, when he said that it is up to us "to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us, that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion, that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
9. Yet the four college students of Moscow, Idaho did not know they were fighting in a war.
Answer: No, they did not, and in some ways, this innocence makes their loss all the more tragic.
Beyond this, I need to point out that I don't believe we can rescue democracy in the short term. I think we might rescue the most meaningful freedoms of mankind in the long term, however.
A government of the people, by the people, for the people is not going to be in effect for a certain interval in the United States. But all of us need to be striving to ensure that after that period of time, certain foundational freedoms that pertain most meaningfully to the self-determination of the individual and the full development of the capacities of humankind can be reclaimed.
The murders of the four college students in Moscow, Idaho --Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Ethan Chapin, and Xana Kernodle -- can serve as a landmark event in the history of falsified law enforcement reporting. And by that I mean that the terror, cruelty, and inhumanity which defined their deaths should compel us to expunge programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting from the long term future of the nation. Whatever role false reporting plays in the short term, in the long term, it can have no role in a peaceable society that upholds the dignity, the sovereignty, and the human rights of all.
10. Why?
Answer: Because if you love your family, you want them to be valued by the society and the nation at large, not just by your handful of relatives in your small circle. Because when you send your children off to college, it is not to have the government slaughter them on campus as part of an FBI program about which the public knows nothing. Because your loved ones deserve to be spoken of respectfully and truthfully during their lifetimes, and after their lifetimes as well -- and you do not want the distortions of government disinformation to obscure the realties of your loved ones' virtue. Because our potential as human beings is going to be dependent on our ability to realign with the truth and integrity of this matter over the long term.
That's why.
11. Will you have the opportunity to make this point more broadly? Didn't you have trespassers on your property early this morning, with threats of home invasion that were quite serious?
Answer: I did have trespass on my property last night. And the threats of home invasion appeared to be tangible, credible and purposeful.
12. You also had threats of car theft, and your car has been moved today. Is that true?
Answer: Yes, my car is facing the opposite direction in the driveway today. It was clearly removed from my driveway, and then, at some point after I posted online about the FBI's threats of car theft, replaced in my driveway.
13. Why wasn't it replaced in the same position?
Answer: Because in order to do that, the driver would have had to approach the house for a k-turn in the driveway. And I was awake at that point. So the maneuver simply couldn't be accomplished.
14. What was the point of the car theft, may I ask?
Answer: I think there were multiple elements. If a person is going to be "extracted" from her home, Special Forces are going to seek to place her (or realistically, her remains) in a secure vehicle. Beyond this, if a person is going to be missing from her home, and there is a missing vehicle as well, then it's a missing persons case and not a murder investigation.
15. So this murder attempt was fairly far along last night. The perpetrators had gone so far as to remove your car.
Answer: Yes, and yes.
16. And President Biden had authorized this?
Answer: This is what the FBI indicates.
17. Would your four family members have survived without you?
Answer: Not for long, no.
18. Regarding your family members, doesn't the FBI indicate that your two sons and MX are scheduled to receive medical care in the near future at a nearby medical center?
Answer: Yes.
19. And doesn't the agency allege that President Biden has arranged for one or more of them to be exposed to a particularly dangerous virus, with a 100% fatality rate, while they are there?
Answer: The FBI has alleged this, yes. The intent appears to be to expose them to a virus that is considered novel, dangerous, and highly transmissible, after which the agency can justify taking lives to "protect the public."
20. So, President Biden would choose to take the lives of your beloved children so that they cannot attest to the harms they have experienced under his leadership and at his directive?
Answer: This is the FBI's allegation.
21. What is the answer here?
Answer: I think President Biden needs to allow immediate outreach to me from an attorney in accordance with FRCP 23, so that these matters can be discussed in an appropriately confidential setting.
22. These issues are as serious as they come.
Answer: Yes, they are.
23. You recently discovered that important documentation had been deleted from your gmail inbox without your participation or consent. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is.
24. Was this a prelude to intended first-degree murder?
Answer: I don't think there is any other reasonable way to interpret the FBI's tampering with my account.
25. The President is allegedly considering pardoning himself for crimes against your family, as well as for crimes against the students in Moscow, Idaho in 2022. And he is allegedly planning to pardon the perpetrator of the Moscow, Idaho crimes as well. Is that your understanding?
Answer: It is.
26. May I ask for your response?
Answer: There are circumstances under which elected leaders can become quite confused about their responsibilities to the public which has invested them with power. At that point, disastrous decisions can be made -- and leaders will seek to mitigate the accountability all along the chain of command.
But that mitigation won't happen if public exposure reaches a critical point.
So, I'm sure these matters are very much on everyone's minds.
27. Doesn't lawful and immediate outreach to you through FRCP 23 seem the only viable way forward?
Answer: Yes, it does. I think the President should withdraw all plans of further falsified law enforcement reporting against my family and myself. I think he should disqualify the false reporting that has already been aggregated against us. And I think he should cancel all plans of further harm against my family members and myself that have recently been authorized or are long-standing plans.
28. Are you speaking about the FBI's claim that there is a black-budget contract that has been signed with the Italian mafia pertaining to you and all your family members?
Answer: That's a particularly egregious example, but there are others.
29. You have said that not all of these matters should be discussed in the public sphere. You are doing so because the President has demonstrated such unremitting and remorseless aggression that you have no other choice.
Answer: The President has evaluated his best alternative to interacting with me fairly and lawfully.
30. Yet, you now ask for that fair and lawful outreach from an attorney through compliance with FRCP 23. Will the President choose to support lawful fulfillment of your request?
Answer: I hope he will now prioritize this honorable approach.
31. Please update us with regard to your safety and that of your loved ones.
Answer: I most certainly will.
32. Thank you for sharing these concerns of import to us all.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your Office's attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. I will be sending further communications to your Office's attention later today.
Please access this information at your earliest possible opportunity.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
