1. You are not a fan of pornography. Is that correct?
Answer: I am not. I've never seen it, actually, even though the FBI claims that the agency has unlawfully filmed my intimacy with my husband of 34 years and distributed this information online, and even though the FBI has claimed to have paid contractors for AI-generated explicit films co-opting my likeness.
2. The FBI appears to have made extensive use of pornography to falsify the "dossiers" of many Americans. Isn't this the case?
Answer: This appears to be true, yes.
3. Recently, Mattel accidentally listed a porn site as a link to doll based on the movie "Wicked." https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/11/movies/mattel-wicked-porn-site-mistake.html. Was this really an accident?
Answer: I highly doubt it. The real question is what happened to the names of the children and their parents who typed the wrongful web address into their computers.
4. What do you believe occurred?
Answer: I believe their names were likely added to a national database of those accessing pornography. I believe the "crime" of trusting a toy company has now almost certainly been added to their permanent records. And, even worse, given that there were children involved, the FBI may be attempting to accuse them of child-related crimes.
5. Does this tie into the fake dossiers you were discussing yesterday?
Answer: It does.
6. So wrongful weblinks such as Mattel's can be utilized to capture large numbers of Americans in "crimes" they never committed.
Answer: That's correct. And I would anticipate that this stratagem is being utilized in many different areas of society at this time, not simply through one toy company. But if investigators looked into the means by which that weblink was "accidentally" included on the packaging for a children's doll, I believe they would run straight into FBI communications with Mattel.
7. How else is the FBI falsely accusing Americans of accessing pornography?
Answer: Well, I can attest that an FBI-affiliate agency is reported to have threatened my older son with death unless he followed his handler's directive to repeatedly access pornographic websites. Now, the FBI alleges that his handler has forced him, also under threat of death, to access the "dark web." And all of this is being added to his fake "dossier" reporting his online activity every single time.
But on a broader scale, the FBI has directed contractors to mine Americans' private cell phones for nude photographs and then placed these online. Police officers have in some cases been directed to locate any nude photos on the cell phones of Americans at routine traffic stops, to document these photos with their own cell phones and then to place the material on the internet.
Americans' private cell phones have been surveilled by contractors paid by the FBI, who utilize the camera function to photograph and film nudity pertaining to what should be the private lives of Americans in their private homes. And this would include bathing, intimacy, dressing, any images at all that contractors can get their hands on -- anything that could be characterized as explicit.
In addition, the FBI is said to have paid contractors to digitally remove the clothes of women whose clothed images may be on their Facebook or Instagram pages.
Then, there's the whole realm of AI-generated still photos and films depicting intimate or explicit situations that never occurred.
Beyond this, Pegasus-style hacks of cell phones presumably allow third party contractors to place material on cell phones of which the owners have no awareness.
So there are multiple means by which the FBI is falsely implicating large numbers of Americans of pornographic access or production.
8. Would the FBI utilize such broad-scale falsified law enforcement reporting to perpetrate mass arrest?
Answer: Absolutely. Yes, it would. And this is exactly what the agency plans to do unless this deceit is appropriately exposed at this juncture.
9. Could large numbers of people be killed on the basis of false charges of pornography?
Answer: What we need to think about is the fact that false reporting involving pornographic images can easily be accompanied by false reporting involving violent images. The FBI's aim is to have a dossier on every American that could wrongfully justify their capital punishment by the government, in a trial they will never see, with a defense they will never have.
10. How do stricter laws surrounding pornography, anticipated to be implemented within the United States within the next year, relate to the FBI's perpetration of falsified law enforcement reporting?
Answer: They unintentionally render crimes against humanity much more possible.
11. Is the FBI the driver behind this change in the law, despite the proposals being advanced through various civilian think tanks?
Answer: Yes, the drivers are almost certainly the FBI and the CIA. Like the firefighter/arsonist, these agencies are creating the crime for which they intend to severely punish the public.
12. Is this true even though the FBI is purchasing implicating material from contractors?
Answer: The FBI now owns myriad contractors which produce AI-generated fake material co-opting the images of Americans without their knowledge or consent. Individual contractors are directed to collect certain types of material from Americans' private cell phones. So the FBI is running this show, make no mistake.
13. How can we best address this issue?
Answer: We need as a society to begin to comprehend the profound dangers of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. Fake dossiers are not a joke, a spoof, an entertainment, or a one-off. Fake dossiers are a systematized means of wrongfully removing a significant portion of the United States population from their homes, and then violating their human rights after they have been dispossessed.
14. Of committing mass atrocities?
Answer: Of committing mass atrocities, yes.
We just need to look at history to see what happens to people after military or paramilitary forces remove them from their homes due to spurious accusations.
Whether it was the Jews in World War II, the Armenians in 1915, or the Tutsis in 1994, the results are generally anti-humanitarian when people are forcibly removed from their homes in large numbers.
15. They tend to be deprived of their lives.
Answer: Yes, they do.
16. Why do you yourself dislike pornography?
Answer: Because I think it's dehumanizing. And I view intimacy as something private and deeply meaningful. I don't think the world needs to find more ways to demean, degrade, or diminish other human beings. I think we've found quite enough. I think we need the opposite of that, which is to honor, respect, value and uplift one another. And that means we need to see the whole person, not just their physical attributes.
17. How should our laws approach pornography given the crimes of false reporting currently being perpetrated by the FBI?
Answer: Very, very carefully. It would be wise to fully assess the problem of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting within the FBI prior to making any changes that could inadvertently facilitate human rights violations toward the public as a whole.
18. If the AI-generated film or films of you, which you have never seen, had been believed, what would have happened to you?
Answer: I want to make perfectly clear that whatever film or films the FBI has shown to others has in fact been widely believed. The images are apparently quite credible. My personal physician of fifteen years believed a defamatory film shown to her by the FBI, and it ruined our relationship overnight. So, the harms have been immense -- incalculable. Films such as these have the power to take apart an entire society in a short period of time, replacing goodwill with distrust, honesty with deceit, healing with harm, human bonds with betrayal. This damage cannot be underestimated.
If the films had been believed within law enforcement, given their alleged content, I could have been arrested.
And in truth, I have no assurance that this material has been disqualified, due to the fact that my FOIA materials have been withheld from me.
19. Is that about to change?
Answer: I certainly hope so.
20. But doesn't the FBI continue to take every opportunity to try to falsely implicate your family members -- and even you yourself -- of wrongdoing?
Answer: The agency is trying, yes. Every day, it endeavors to add new lies to the fake "dossiers" we have never seen.
21. You are simply hoping that this predation toward your family will be halted by the White House.
Answer: Yes, I am.
22. Which White House -- the current or the future?
Answer: Both.
23. Will you please let us know about the ongoing health and safety of your family members, MX, and you yourself?
Answer: I certainly will.
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. -- Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or their affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of their manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
No comments:
Post a Comment