1. It was conveyed to you this morning that affiliates of the FBI had trafficked your older son against his will this past week. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is.
2. Had this happened previously?
Answer: I believe so. He was raped by agency contractors on July 19, 2024 in order to coerce his signature on knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. Following that crime, abuses allegedly continued.
3. Does your older son have a disability?
Answer: Yes, he does.
4. So FBI affiliates are now trafficking those with disabilities in order to discredit the family of a whistleblower?
Answer: This is their own allegation, and based on communications with my son, I believe it occurred.
5. These crimes were committed at President Biden's authorization?
Answer: The FBI indicates that they were.
6. Has the agency indicated to you that the President now intends to take the lives of your sons and MX so they cannot disclose the truth of these events to investigators?
Answer: Yes.
7. So, effectively, on learning that your disabled son was being raped under threat of death if he disclosed this to you, you are expected to say nothing about it?
Answer: I'm sure the White House would like to take the lives of my family members and myself in order to silence us regarding the crimes President Biden, Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa, among others, have committed against us. But in order for them to do that, we need to remain quiet.
8. But you're not remaining quiet in this circumstance. So, those who believe they might cover up their crimes by further harming your sons, MX, your husband or you yourself..."
Answer: Are mistaken.
10. Who is the real driver of these crimes against your family? Is it President Biden, Brandan Pesa, or Tom Lyons?
Answer: Brandan Pesa has appeared to make reference President Biden in the past as a "marionette." When I looked up "Commander in Chief" one day on my cell phone, my search was re-routed to a Wikipedia definition, complete with photos, of a marionette with strings.
11. Would you say that a significant portion of the FBI is also under Brandan Pesa's control?
Answer: From everything I have observed, the agency appears to be in the hold of organized crime, yes.
12. So isn't it likely that Brandan Pesa is the malevolent individual who is setting this policy of egregious aggression against your family, and the President and the FBI are just following along like Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum?
Answer: It appears likely, yes.
13. So what does that mean when Brandan Pesa gloats that he will direct President Biden to pardon him as the "last official act of his Presidency"? Does that mean that the man who has raped and attempted to murder your family will be exonerated by the President?
Answer: I think a person can only be pardoned of a crime of which they have been convicted through due process. But it's likely that Brandan Pesa exerts sufficient control over the court system that he could engineer a secret proceeding immediately prior to directing his own pardon.
14. That doesn't prevent you from revealing that Brandan Pesa is, in truth, a sadistic serial killer who, by his own apparent admission and that of the FBI, murdered four college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022.
Answer: No, it doesn't. I could take out a billboard on this subject if I wanted to, and the FBI could do nothing about it. This represents the simple truth. And the court of public opinion may not be quite so forgiving of this type of remorseless criminal as the current President. The public didn't elect him, appoint him, vet him, or assess his beliefs before he decided to wield such indefensible, violent and unjustified control over them. And so the public may have something to say about his crimes against the innocent.
15. There is allegedly a text conversation between President Biden, Brandan Pesa and Tom Lyons which is part of materials now due to you in which all three men plan to take the lives of your family members for their personal profit. Is that true?
Answer: The FBI alleges that this text thread exists, yes.
16. Are you going to have the opportunity to read it?
Answer: I certainly hope so. Brandan Pesa, the FBI, and its affiliates appear to be attempting to counter my right of access by continuing to create, aggregate, and submit to the Supreme Court volumes of AI-generated falsified information every day.
17. Doesn't the Supreme Court know by now that the material is false?
Answer: I would guess that the Supreme Court has seen enough disproven assertions of the FBI and the CIA to know that these agencies are engaged in intentionally falsified law enforcement reporting, yes.
18. So, shouldn't the FBI and its affiliates be forced to pause their false reporting with a Stay while an attorney reaches out to you in compliance with FRCP 23?
Answer: This would be the logical and just course of action.
19. Can the OIG Hotline request such a Stay with a certain reasonable length of time involved? Didn't you ask for a moratorium on all new disinformation until you were provided with attorney contact plus 60 days?
Answer: Yes, I did.
20. Couldn't that be sought at this juncture?
Answer: I would think the Supreme Court would wield that discretion, yes.
21. Such a Stay, granted by the Supreme Court, would constitute quite a remarkable gift to the American people regarding the matter of falsified law enforcement reporting.
Answer: It would constitute quite a remarkable gift to the American people regarding their future freedoms.
22. Are you hereby requesting that the OIG Hotline seek it?
Answer: Yes, I am.
23. Will you please let us know if and when you receive outreach from an attorney?
Answer: I certainly will.
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
No comments:
Post a Comment