1. Your younger son is said to still be receiving directives from FBI Chief of Station Txx Lxxxx, even though Mr. Lxxxx is primarily implicated in crimes at your family's property on Cape Cod. What is wrong with this?
Answer: Many things. The ethical violations and conflict of interest are so astonishing, it's hard to know where to begin. President Biden should never have coerced my sons into spying on their own law-abiding parents for pay, knowing that I was and am a whistleblower of FBI malfeasance in the form of the agency's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting about our family.
Fortunately, President Trump has taken the only acceptable stance, which is to extend honorable discharge to both of my sons and Mary Grinnell with regard to all government programs.
2. So why is Txx Lxxxx still directing your younger son in improper ways that are intended to wrongfully implicate him?
Answer: Txx Lxxxx likely believes that he may be imprisoned for his crimes against my family. So, in directing communications to my son, he almost certainly feels he has nothing to lose in attempting to cause us further harm.
3. Has Txx Lxxxx prevented news of President Trump's honorable discharge of your sons and Mary Grinnell from reaching them at this time?
Answer: I believe he has, yes. He is behaving as if he still has the power to direct them without restraint, even though he has allegedly been charged for certain crimes against my family and will soon be charged for many more.
4. What is Txx Lxxxx asking your younger son to do?
Answer: Something wrong. Something unlawful. Something of which President Trump does not approve and will disavow.
5. What are the details of the problems the FBI is said to have caused with Customs and Immigration on your son's return to the United States?
Answer: The FBI is attempting to falsify his return interview with Mexican Customs and Immigration, according to threats received. That act, plus the agency's planting something improper in his luggage would be enough to have him wrongfully jailed in Mexico. From there, anything could happen.
6. How have you directed him to handle himself?
Answer: I have extended wise advice that will prevent him from having problems. But the fact that Txx Lxxxx is trying this at all demonstrates how deeply panicked the agency is over its wrongdoing in this matter.
7. Does the agency believe that its crimes against your family in this matter will be broadly and publicly exposed?
Answer: The FBI is certainly acting as though this is the case. If the agency jails my son in Mexico or some other country, that's an enormous lever with which to ensure my silence regarding the FBI's crimes. And this is their intent, to be sure.
8. Wouldn't the FBI do better by apologizing to you and your family for its unwarranted crimes against all of you? Doesn't that make more sense on every level?
Answer: Of course it does. Someone might point that out to FBI personnel who appear to be panicking as reflected by their exceptionally poor decisions at this time.
9. The FBI has appeared to state that it has conveyed or will convey some fatal illness to your son or Mary Grinnell in their hotel room and, further, that the only way he can secure their recovery is by complying with Txx Lxxxx' demands.
What are your thoughts about these allegations, please?
Answer: This whole sequence of events appears to be a well-worn trope on the part of the FBI. The agency gives someone a seemingly fatal illness, then compels a crime of aggression in return for the cure. They do this over and over again, without respite, mercy, compassion or humanity.
10. What happens if someone refuses to comply with their demands under these circumstances?
Answer: Presumably the agency either allows them to die of illness, hastens their demise through a medical "accident," or murders them by arguing that they have an illness with pxxxxxxx potential.
11. A murder for which the FBI is gaining permission before a judge?
Answer: Oh, yes, this is all argued before a judge. The FBI simply leaves out the revelation that the agency caused the illness in the first place.
12. You expect your son and Mary Grinnell to decline all FBI directives, and all directives from FBI affiliates to cause harm to anyone under any and every circumstance, because this directly conflicts with President Trump's order that your sons and Mary Grinnell are to receive honorable discharge.
Answer: Yes, it stands in direct defiance of a clear and ethical directive from the Commander in Chief. So my son needs to decline.
13. There are no circumstances under which it would be acceptable for him to state that the FBI had withheld information about his honorable discharge?
Answer: Absolutely not. President Trump's ethical decision on this matter releasing my sons and Mary Grinnell from service immediately is the only one that counts. All other directives are invalid in the face of the honorable discharge orders President Trump has already extended.
14. Do President Trump's orders of honorable discharge for your sons and Mary Grinnell demonstrate what a different President he is than President Biden?
Answer: In the clearest way imaginable. President Biden attempted to destroy my family for his personal profit. President Trump is attempting to put it back together.
It takes character, and he is facing down a powerful agency in this process. And, from my standpoint, Americans should be allowed to grasp the difference in leadership between these two men.
The American public is a sleeping giant; but once it wakes, its judgement can be swift and severe. Similarly, when provided with a stark contrast between two leaders, the public will rally to elevate a leader who has stood in defense of their values, and especially those values supporting the preservation of the American family.
15. President Biden was allegedly obsessed with questions surrounding "legacy" considerations once the Supreme Court, the DOJ and the Congress learning of his actions toward your family.
Answer: He suffered significant damage to his reputation within Washington, D.C., but the larger American public still has no idea of the crimes he perpetrated against us.
16. Will President Trump now decide to bring President Biden's crimes to light?
Answer: I look forward to learning the answer to that question. It's quite important, and I'm sure he's giving it some deep thought.
17. In the meantime, you are immensely grateful to him for standing up for your sons and Mary Grinnell at this time.
Answer: Immensely is the word. Just as the American public will be grateful to know that President Trump in standing in defense of those they love most in the world. American families build American neighborhoods, which build American towns, which build American states which build the American nation as a whole. We cannot manage a President like President Biden, who is willing to sacrifice our families for his reported avarice. It's not tenable, and the public will never accept it.
18. Given these astonishing cross-currents due to the malfeasance within the FBI, what is the advice you are giving to your younger son at this time?
Answer: The only directive he needs to hold in his mind is President Trump's honorable discharge for both him and Mary Grinnell. His illness, if the FBI has already transmitted it, will be retracted at President Trump's directive as well.
19. So, your sons should not heed any directives from the FBI that direct them to cause harm to anyone.
Answer: No, they should not.
20. And your older son should not allow FBI contractors to enter your house through his bedroom's French doors this evening in order to steal your documents and jewelry in a purported "home invasion robbery gone wrong."
Answer: No, he should not.
21. The only thing your sons and Mary Grinnell need to hold in mind is that President Trump has honorably discharged all of them from service.
Answer: That is correct. They should follow no directives that conflict with their highest possible ethical knowledge of what is right and honest. That's the standard President Trump is holding to. They need to understand how critical their character strength is in this moment.
22. Even though they have lost certain critical aspects of their sovereignty?
Answer: They have, indeed, lost sovereignty. But President Trump believes it can be restored. The FBI is accountable to President Trump regarding my sons and Mary Grinnell, and further, the FBI is accountable to me regarding my entire family. So, I want to see the agency fall into line with the higher ethics both President Trump and I myself are demonstrating.
23. Is that possible now?
Answer: Of course it is. That's why I'm talking to you this afternoon. To ensure that it's possible.
24. Since your younger son has been honorably discharged, please share his name with us one more time?
Answer: Duncan Sayer MacWilliams.
25. And please share his photograph.
Answer: Gladly.
26. Will you please let us know how your younger son is faring over the next several days in Panama? He is scheduled to return to the United States on February 20, 2025. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, I will keep you up to date, and yes, February 20 2025 is his return date.
27. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: I am happy to do so. President Trump's honorable discharge of my loved ones has rendered it possible.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment