1. Your younger son Duncan MacWilliams is visiting Panama right now to attend the wedding of college friends. Is Panama prone to earthquakes?
Answer: It is, but not the kind the FBI appears to be threatening toward my son.
2. May I ask you to clarify?
Answer: Panama is in an active seismic zone, but harm currently being threatened toward my son by the FBI would not constitute a natural disaster.
3. Is the FBI threatening the deployment of some type of harm that would mimic an earthquake?
Answer: This appears to be the case.
4. You have separately received FBI threats of alleged street crime in Panama that would affect your son or his fiancee. Is that accurate?
Answer: It is, yes.
5. And your older son is being threatened with harm perpetrated by his barber, of all things. The FBI appears to have suggested the application of a "poison" or "toxin" of some kind to his scalp or face. Alternatively, a skull fracture of the kind you allegedly sustained last Sunday has also been threatened against him. Is that your understanding?
Answer: Yes, it is.
6. What's going on? Why is the FBI preying upon your sons in this manner?
Answer: I believe the FBI has been caught in planting unknown evidence of capital crimes at my parents' home on Cape Cod, and possibly even on our own 3.5 acre property in Portola Valley, which has an undefended perimeter. I have requested that bloodhounds search both properties and I have asked for an update on this investigation from the OIG Hotline.
I believe the FBI thinks that if the agency can murder a member of my family, the agency can then proceed to extend a false narrative about its other crimes regarding this matter.
7. You believe the FBI is trying to victimize a family member or you yourself only to blame the victim of capital crimes after the fact.
Answer: This is the way the FBI thinks. You really need to understand the distorted logic of the agency.
8. How do you mean?
Answer: The agency will never admit fault unless absolutely forced to do so. In general, agency personnel are trained to commit further crimes to cover up their previous crimes. And under most circumstances, they operate with impunity.
The USA gymnasts' case, in which victims' statements had all been falsified by two FBI agents, was an exception in which the FBI was forced to publicly apologize.
But that's a rarity.
9. Should the FBI extend an apology to you and your family members?
Answer: Oh, yes. And I am not insisting that that apology be public, for various reasons, although the agency does need to retract its defamation in each and every case it was perpetrated against us. But the apology does need to be extended, rather emphatically and rather immediately.
10. But you are not likely to get that apology until you receive an update on the investigation, as you have requested. Is that forthcoming on an urgent basis?
Answer: I believe that everyone understands our lives are on the line until we receive it. So, I hope so.
11. Is President Trump standing in your defense and that of your family members at this time?
Answer: He is exercising as much power as he possesses on our behalf, certainly.
12. Is it enough?
Answer: We're all going to find that out. The FBI is attempting to encroach on the powers of the Presidency, so we all need to come to a clearer understanding of the unconstitutional demands the agency is making of the executive branch. None of us should be comfortable with an FBI that extends dictates to any elected official whatsoever, whether in the White House, the Congress, the State House or elsewhere.
President Trump believes in a strong and independent Presidency, so I'm certain he's pushing back to the greatest extent that he can.
13. This appears to be an extraordinary circumstance of egregious malfeasance by the FBI under the Biden administration, with rogue agents who are attempting to conceal their crimes at this point in time. Is this an accurate characterization of events?
Answer: I believe it is, yes.
14. Is the FBI accountable to the American people with regard to this case?
Answer: Again, the extent to which this matter becomes broadly public needs to be decided by the Justice Department and the White House, among others.
15. Lawyers representing you in this case have allegedly needed to file several appeals before the Supreme Court because the FBI keeps trying to argue that your entire family's lives should be taken in order to keep the agency's crimes a secret.
Answer: That's my understanding.
16. What is your thought about this?
Answer: I don't believe that the Supreme Court enjoys being treated like pawns by a corrupt FBI. I'm sure the Honorable Justices are appalled to have to act as though they are viewing seriously whatever AI-generated "evidence" is being presented by wayward FBI personnel at this point.
17. You believe that the Supreme Court knows exactly what the FBI is doing pertaining to engaging in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against your family and MX.
Answer: Oh, yes. I'm certain the Supreme Court knows the truth of the FBI's crimes against us at this time.
18. And what about the Committee? Has the Committee taken another vote in favor of protecting your lives?
Answer: While I don't have that information, I do believe that the Committee is interested in preserving the long term freedom of mankind. When Committee members vote for our survival, they convey their unwavering support for those freedoms as they pertain to our nation's future. So, I believe the Committee will stand in defense of my family, because its members can do no less.
19. Will you please keep us updated on the well-being of your family and of you yourself under these astonishing circumstances?
Answer: I certainly will.
20. Thank you for taking the time to speak with us this morning.
Answer: You're quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
*********************************************************************************
Disclaimer: Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
No comments:
Post a Comment