1. You condemn political violence, and you wish to make that clear. Is that correct?
Answer: Emphatically. I condemn all forms of violence, but political violence has a devastating effect on our society as a whole, making leaders feel that they do not possess the freedom to speak openly about their views. Our democracy is immediately imperiled by such crimes, and in reality, that is the intent. So we need to be keenly sensitive to the drivers of these events, and we need to identify them with as much courage and clarity as we can.
2. What words would you extend to Charlie Kirk's widow and children?
Answer: Words of grief, shock, compassion, support and protection. I'm sure they are receiving this outreach, but I think the public needs to remember how critical the heartfelt empathy of strangers can be in situations of appalling, inconceivable loss. They need abundant support, and they will need abundant support through time, and I hope they are receiving it.
3. Your comments yesterday referenced the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program as implicated in this crime. How could investigators most rapidly assess whether Pxxxxxx was involved?
Answer: Pxxxxxx Program members such as the assailant in this case are going to have a root canal in an upper back molar, just as my sons have. And this facilitates the placement of an implanted communications device that is close enough to the ear canal for "recruits" to hear directives 24/7. So, investigators should get a full-mouth x-ray of the assailant as soon as possible.
4. Is there anything unusual about this root canal?
Answer: The filler material is non-conventional, and it is not going to show up as the bright white filler that usually appears on a dental x-ray as identifying a root canal. Even so, the points of the dentin at the roots will no longer be visible. Any dentist, and even an educated layperson, would be able to look at the x-ray and determine immediately that they are not looking at a living tooth.
5. Does the assailant in this case have a handler?
Answer: Oh, yes.
6. Is his handler still giving him directives?
Answer: Absolutely. That's the reason he is not cooperating and will not be cooperating.
7. Would the assailant have had specific training regarding sniping in the context of the Pxxxxxx Program?
Answer: Yes, he would, just as my sons have.
8. What are the other markers of Pxxxxxx Program involvement in this political assassination?
Answer: Any time we are seeing a sniper on a roof, we can be assured that the three-letter agencies are involved. The roof height and sight lines would have been carefully calculated by the FBI in advance. This is beyond the capacities of a lone wolf 22-year old. And other unbalanced individuals his age are simply not going to have the capacity or the foreknowledge to puzzle out all of the details.
Specifics like the writing on the bullets, the implicating texts to the roommate, the fact that the roommate is transgender and transitioning -- all of this is too neat and tidy for the purposes of the FBI.
9. In what way do you mean?
Answer: It's just designed to foment hatred, resentment, bias against vulnerable populations, and desires for revenge on the part of the public. If the FBI had scripted the details, they would all look like this. And that's because the FBI did script those details, every single one of them.
10. Wouldn't the assailant's parents have known if he had been recruited by the Pxxxxxx Program?
Answer: My husband still doesn't know that my sons have been recruited by the Pxxxxxx Program, and he sees them all the time. The answer is a resounding no. These coerced "recruitments" are very effectively concealed. Again, you've got to look with care at the dental x-rays, and then you need to start assessing the point at which the family members noticed a change in verbal assertions and personal conduct.
The FBI's Pxxxxxx Program file on the assailant is going to be a mile thick, but only the DOJ and the ODNI are going to be able to access it.
11. You made the point that Charlie Kirk would have had a file within the FBI, too, which is highly surprising.
Answer: Well, it's necessary to understand how the agency thinks about its targets. In totalitarian systems, "targets" always have false reporting against them, intended to justify their harm. It's a strange fact that all totalitarian systems want to dot the i's and cross the t's of their documentation. The FBI wants to be compulsively neat and organized about the falsehoods that they aggregate.
12. What could possibly be the content of false accusations against someone like Charlie Kirk, who led an exemplary personal life, by all accounts?
Answer: He was extremely courageous in speaking publicly about his faith, so I could guess with some confidence that the FBI would have mischaracterized him as a radical on the basis of his religious beliefs alone. They would have gathered witness statements about how his public speaking represented a danger to the stability of the society, given what the FBI would document as a delusional belief in God.
And that would be enough for the agency to go before a judge somewhere and argue for the authorization to take his life.
13. Was there a judicial process involved?
Answer: Yes, there was. These judicial proceedings are not public. But yes, there is no doubt a judge somewhere who agreed with the FBI's argument that Charlie Kirk was a religious radical and a danger to the society as a whole.
14. Would Charlie Kirk's widow have access to the FBI's file regarding her late husband?
Answer: Only in dramatically redacted form. Even so, she should request it through the Freedom of Information Act, with the support of her Congressional representative.
15. Is the assailant at risk of harm within the prison system, given that the FBI will not want these details to be made publicly available?
Answer: At significant risk, yes. The FBI often conveys HIV to prisoners like the assailant, subsequently withholding medical care, in order to fully control their words and actions going forward. But clearly, the FBI could simply cause his murder or "suicide" within prison to ensure that he would never be capable of relaying the truth of his experience at the hands of the agency.
16. When a Pxxxxxx Program "recruit" has suffered repeated sovereignty violations over the course of 6-18 months at the hands of the FBI, are his decisions his own?
Answer: Absolutely not, and I say this from the horrific experience of having seen my sons be utterly overtaken by their handlers over a comparatively brief period of time. Their words, actions and beliefs are simply no longer their own. They have endured a kind of brainwashing through multiple modalities that I will not delineate here. But the sovereignty violations are very severe, and they ultimately translate to an erasure of the true identity of the individual.
17. Following this elemental damage to the individual's identity, can he recover?
Answer: I don't know. I have not seen that recovery when it comes to my own sons. The FBI appears to allege that it is possible, but the agency has elected not to support my sons' or MX's reclamation of themselves. So, this is not at all clear. For the FBI, the destruction of individual sovereignty and decision-making is intended to be a one-way street.
18. You have described the erasure of the individual through the Pxxxxxx Program's sovereignty violations to be worse than first-degree murder.
Answer: It is worse than first-degree murder yes, because the person you loved is still walking and talking, even though their beliefs, their ethics, their personality, their principles, their boundaries, their loving bonds and their conscience are all destroyed.
Speak to the parents of the assailant in this case, and I'm sure they will relate that they don't recognize their son's words and actions compared to who he was several years ago. Yet he is not likely to be mentally ill, because there's a fairly high degree of cognition required for the Pxxxxxx Program training and "assignments." It's likely that his personality has simply been hollowed out and replaced with another set of values, ethics, boundaries and decision-making.
19. Would you describe the handlers' control over Pxxxxxx Program recruits as complete?
Answer: Yes, it is complete.
20. America was founded through a quest for religious freedom. And you have described yourself as a person of faith who has received threats of assassination by the FBI. How do you feel about the agency's involvement in the assassination of Charlie Kirk?
Answer: You know, I think this was a devastating act, intended to undermine freedom of expression within the United States and meant to terrorize anyone who has the temerity to speak about faith and /or politics in the public sphere in a way that departs from a carefully scripted narrative.
The FBI wants "compliance" -- not from some people, but from all people.
Charlie Kirk objected to that demand from the agency, just as he refused to pre-plan the content of his interviews with journalists.
We all need to be grieving the loss of Charlie Kirk, whatever our political or religious beliefs, not only because of the humanitarian crime, but also because of the fact that his loss represents tremendous damage to the nation's character.
21. Who will have dispensation to learn the full truth of the FBI's actions in this case?
Answer: Well, as I said, some members of the DOJ will have access to the facts in their entirety, and some members of the ODNI will as well. If the assailant's lawyer starts requesting records from the government regarding the Pxxxxxx Program, we're going to start to see a lot of sealed records.
22. Has the FBI allowed the assignment of a high-level attorney to your case as of this moment?
Answer: Not as of now, no. I am waiting for that progress.
23. Please keep us apprised of your safety and wellbeing, as well as that of your loved ones, in the meantime.
Answer: Thank you for your concern. I most certainly will.
Lane MacWilliams
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
