The Truth About Charlie Kirk

 1.  Do you have any thoughts about the recent assassination of Charlie Kirk?

Answer:  Many.

2.  May I ask what they are?

Answer:  I am going to choose my words carefully regarding this matter.  Charlie Kirk appears to have been an honorable conservative who arrived at his ideas genuinely, through deep contemplation and earnest, respectful engagement with others.  He had quite a few unique qualities, and I think those virtues were concerning to a number of other groups, who did not feel that his alliances were entirely predictable.

3.  Was Charlie Kirk approached by the "Media" division of the FBI?

Answer:  This is an important question.  And, of course, he almost certainly was.

4.  And how did that conversation go?

Answer:  Not well, apparently.  Mr. Kirk did not like to speak to the public with controlled or pre-approved messaging.  He would have resisted this suggested in every measure.  Even television journalists have commented that Mr. Kirk would not pre-plan an interview's content.  He wanted to be himself and he wanted to exercise freedom of speech at every turn.  He was notably unwilling to abandon that Constitutional right.

5.  Was something wrong with his insistence on freedom of speech?

Answer:  This moment in history.  That's what was wrong with it.

Mr. Kirk, though a highly intelligent and observant person, likely failed to understand the FBI's overture for the unspoken ultimatum it was.

6.  What was that unspoken ultimatum, please?

Answer:  "Join or die."  And this is the same ultimatum the FBI has extended to ministers, educators, librarians, professors and certain politicians all across the United States.  The FBI wants total compliance with messaging objectives in the short term, and no doubt the long term as well.  

7.  Would Charlie Kirk's widow have been aware of the overture from the FBI?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  She would have known all about it.

8.  What about the assassin in this case?

Answer:  There are many signs that this is a young man who has suffered extensive sovereignty violations.  

9.  Does he have a file within the FBI under the agency's unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program?

Answer:  Yes, he does.

10.  So, the FBI was actually responsible for this death?

Answer:  I will simply say that  I think the FBI's files regarding this matter contain extensive information regarding this matter.

11.  Will the public have access to that information?

Answer:  The public cannot gain access to the most meaningful of the FBI's files on JFK's assassination, despite the prolonged efforts of Congress and several Presidents.  So, no.  The public is not going to see any substantive information about this at all.

12.  Is the FBI attempting to foment civil conflict within the United States?

Answer:  You're asking an insightful question.

13.  Will the FBI be committing more of these harms against the honorable American public?

Answer:  The public would benefit from asking this question as well.

14.  Has the FBI threatened to co-opt one or both of your sons into a scheme related to public harm, given that both of them were unwillingly conscripted into the same Pxxxxxx Program that was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk?

Answer:  Many times.  And we cannot leave out the FBI's threats of staged suicide alongside those threats of public harm.  Because both of these threats are within the FBI's ready arsenal.

15.  What are your thoughts about the assailant's parents in this case?

Answer:  My heart goes out to Charlie Kirk's widow and children, and to the assailant's family members as well.  They have all been victimized by this initiative, and in ways that will change their futures forever.  So, it's deeply saddening to me, and to millions of others, I know.

16.  Can the FBI grasp the fact that independent thinkers can be a great asset to the nation?

Answer:  This is an important inquiry, because I believe there are substantive gifts possessed by people exercising their full sovereignty and self-determination that can benefit the nation in a way that is irreplaceable and transformative.  The FBI is filled with literalists, so they may have difficulty understanding how that could be the case.  But this is the reason that high-level intermediaries are necessary for the agency.

17.  You have recently expressed that a high-level intermediary is necessary for the resolution of your concerns regarding the FBI to date.  Is that true?

Answer:  Yes, an attorney or other intermediary needs to immediately be assigned to this matter, in my opinion.

18.  Will you please keep us apprised of your safety and security, and that of your family members, in the meantime?

Answer:  Of course, I will.

19.  Your sons and MX are allegedly still being harmed by the FBI as of this moment?

Answer:  Yes, they are.

20.  Thank you very much for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams