1. You were turned away by three RCMP Police stations when you recently asked for assistance with preparing an ink fingerprint card for the FBI. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is. I was referred to a private company that offers fingerprinting services instead.
2. Did you contact a private company for fingerprinting assistance?
Answer: Because it seemed inevitable that I would meet with further obstruction and delays, I did not.
3. What did you do instead?
Answer: I borrowed a black ink pad from the Whistler Public Library and did my best to provide my own fingerprints.
4. What is your estimation of the quality of those fingerprints?
Answer: My fingerprints are somewhat degraded by creases and gaps due to unwanted weight loss, the causes of which I have discussed on my blog. However, despite that, I do think my right thumb print is readable, and I have referred the FBI to the Canadian electronic fingerprinting system. So, the FBI is certainly going to be able to access my CJIS record, assuming I have one.
5. Has the FBI asked to conceal a CJIS record from you through a judicial process?
Answer: There appears to be the implication that the agency has asked the Supreme Court to conceal that documentation, yes.
6. What was the result?
Answer: The FBI seems to feel that the Supreme Court refused the suggestion that background checks should be deleted or altered when sought by complainants.
7. So the FBI is in a serious bind with regard to your case.
Answer: Based upon the Venezuelan gang members in the Whistler Public Library yesterday, along with others who have appeared to intrude on my space today -- apparently hacking my cell phone and laptop to send fake communications while in my immediate vicinity -- yes, the FBI is in a serious bind.
8. Should the FBI be panicking about the agency's need to provide documentation of its falsified law enforcement reporting against you through the background checks you have requested?
Answer: No. The agency needs to provide me with the full reports on an immediate basis. And then it needs to engage in outreach that will facilitate the resolution of my concerns to date.
9. What is your view of the FBI's threats that some support taking your life and your family members' lives through a non-conventional vector of a virus in your residence, through a staged car accident or through Dxx deployment overnight that is designed to attack the heart, the kidneys, the liver or the brain?
Answer: Again, the agency needs to provide me with the full reports on an immediate basis, without causing any further harm whatsoever.
10. Who is really driving the demand to take your life and the lives of your loved ones at this juncture?
Answer: The most pernicious and destructive predation toward my family and myself appears to be originating with A. himself.
11. This is an individual who is referred to by the United States military leadership as "Apollo." Is that true?
Answer: Yes, it is.
12. What is Apollo's interest in your case?
Answer: Apollo has benefited from my case financially, and reportedly to enormous degree. And it needs to be understood that Apollo is without question an enemy of all human sovereignty over the long term. So, his directives that false accusations should be repeatedly extended within the auspices of my case for the express objective of profiteering from my family's torture carry profound implications for our ability to defend the sovereignty of mankind over the long term.
13. Why is that the case?
Answer: Apollo wants the money now, not later. And, make no mistake, separate and apart from the environmental concerns that we share with Apollo, we don't have much else in common.
Apollo is engaged in a power play against the whole of humanity, and he is using the environmental crisis, together with my case, to aggregate an advantage that will not later be undone.
This is an individual who supports totalitarian controls over the whole of humanity that are unlike any others we have witnessed through the scope of human history.
So, we stand at a critical juncture, and Apollo, with regard to the handling of my case, is the fundamental problem.
14. What leverage do we have, given that Apollo has superior technology that leaves us with scant military or scientific defense against his threats of harm?
Answer: Again, I would like to emphasize that we share Apollo's environmental concerns. There is no justification for underestimating the seriousness of our climate crisis, nor the fact that certain critical inflection points are occurring now, not later.
Having said that, we do not share Apollo's long term view of the enslavement of humanity as a whole.
We do have leverage in this situation, and our leverage is located in the fact that Apollo is not ready for prime time. Apollo is not ready for his close-up with Cecil B. DeMille. Nor is he ready for media coverage in any objective and rigorous form. Fundamentally, Apollo is not ready for exposure to the American public, or any other general public. And so, our advantage is the fact that, at this time, the illumination of Apollo represents his undoing.
15. What is your thought regarding the allegation that your case has been manipulated to vastly enrich Apollo?
Answer: I would like to see his list of assets, and I think the American people have an interest in examining his list of assets as well.
16. Is Apollo holding America's military leadership hostage to his threat to perpetrate catastrophic, though temporary, environmental harm in some manner?
Answer: Yes, he is.
17. If that is the case, does the American military have to bend to his whim?
Answer: Not quite, as I said. I think that Apollo needs to understand that he can be exposed in a manner that will not allow him to recover his current leverage. Humanity is capable of meeting short term mission and objectives without Apollo. We don't need him to accomplish that. Nor do we need him to raid our national treasury so as to ensure that we will not be able to reclaim the fundamentals of human sovereignty in the future.
Apollo needs some pushback, in my opinion. Apollo needs to be served an oversized helping of humble pie.
18. Who is capable of accomplishing that task?
Answer: Writers who have access to information about Apollo. And this is the reason that independent journalism is so critical at this time. As much as our national security apparatus decries certain historic leaks that have occurred, our three-letter agencies now require the leverage that informed journalists can bring to bear.
19. You have said that the United States is much better positioned to defend the long term sovereignty of mankind than Russia and China are.
Answer: That is correct. Why would we look to Russia and China to defend human freedoms they have long ago abandoned?
If humanity is to emerge in the long term with any semblance of the freedoms we now define as intertwined with our most meaningful potential, it will be because the United States assumes leadership of certain global concerns pertaining to sovereignty, now and in the future.
20. Is the full disclosure of the CJIS record and the OIG Hotline's investigative record necessary in the interests of long term human sovereignty?
Answer: It truly is. No one is going to labor as I have labored over this issue. And I hasten to add that there are those within the OIG Hotline who have demonstrated heroic qualities that are simply too rare to count on locating again.
I am not suggesting that all FBI programs should be rendered public, by any means.
But I am saying that the details of my case, conveyed into my possession, are necessary to bring the FBI and its affiliates to the table with regard to the long term sovereignty concerns I have raised.
Again, Apollo is not ready for his Cecil B. DeMille closeup, and that means that the long term freedoms of mankind still have a chance.
It is up to us to perceive that chance and to ensure that it is realized.
21. That takes some courage, given the current threats to your life, your loved ones' lives, and even your pets' lives.
Answer: Socrates felt that the best leadership possessed wisdom, courage, temperance and justice, in that order. He left justice as the last quality, because it was the most difficult to define.
22. Why is justice so challenging a notion for human society?
Answer: Because we often fail to see the big picture. That's why. Someone who erases a CJIS record today may be told that he is protecting "national security interests," not that he is ensuring the diminishment of the human race over the long term. Someone who pulls an investigative record out of the mail in order to alter its contents may be thinking about concealing his own graft rather than thinking about what a loss of human sovereignty will mean for his own children in ten or twenty years. We are suffering from an epidemic of reductive thinking and incomplete analysis. And those failings lead to long term injustice.
23. Would you encourage all those involved in this case to think about more than themselves?
Answer: I would, because they need to know that I am thinking about the big picture with every step I take. If I can take that view, after my own children have suffered torture, trafficking and decimation of their personal sovereignty over this issue -- then so can they. And if the sovereignty of mankind is to endure, it will be because our leaders understood that we needed work together for its survival.
24. Will you please keep us informed of your safety and well-being, and that of your family members, and even your pets, given the extensive threats you are currently receiving from the FBI?
Answer: Yes, I will.
25. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment