1. A significant portion of your son's medical records on disc were erased today without your consent -- specifically an ultrasound from El Camino Hospital, conducted on June 13, 2023 and an MRI from Stanford Medicine, collected on February 18, 2023.
Answer: Yes, I didn't realize at first that both discs were compromised. But this appears to be the case. I do have one backup disc of the Stanford study, and I do have photos of the El Camino study, which I am currently endeavoring to replace.
2. What does this erasure signify to you?
Answer: The erasure is indicative of a potential plan of law enforcement aggression, in my view.
3. Why do you consider this to be the case?
Answer: The FBI knows that it has been caught in a plan of first-degree murder in gratuitously and intentionally exposing a young man, the son of an FBI whistleblower, to alveolar schistosomiasis. That's a damning reality, and one which the public will not view forgivingly. In order for the agency to evade accountability on this front, it needs to erase both the patient and the medical imaging. So, I believe that to have been the intent.
4. And what would the justification be for "erasing the patient" through unwarranted aggression, whether at your home or otherwise?
Answer: More false reporting by the FBI and its affiliates. Today on my Amazon "recommended for you" products was a book called The Anarchist's Cookbook. It's really necessary to understand that peaceable people like those in my family are horrified by this kind of material and want to have nothing to do with it.
5. Are you an anarchist?
Answer: Absolutely not.
6. Are you someone who would ever seek to cause harm to others?
Answer: Not in any way, shape or form.
7. What about your husband and sons?
Answer: My husband and sons are determinedly peaceable and law-abiding.
8. You have received repeated threats about your younger son being prosecuted for an unknown crime as a direct result of an FBI set-up.
Answer: I have, yes. And I think that's due to the fact that, the closer I come to implicating far right factions of the FBI of preying upon the law-abiding public, the more the agency seeks to mischaracterize my family members and myself as criminals.
The fact that the agency transmitted alveolar schistosomiasis to my older son -- this represents unconscionable harm.
The agency knows this quite well.
9. How is your son doing physically at this time?
Answer: Poorly. He has lost a great deal of weight, which is typical in alveolar schistosomiasis disease progression and can also happen with high HGH. He is not receptive to the idea that he may have contracted a parasite, nor to the idea that he likely has an unaddressed pituitary tumor. So, the situation is quite serious, quite fraught.
10. How so?
Answer: It's not possible to get well without an accurate diagnosis. Beyond this, the patient needs to accept that diagnosis in order to cooperate in his own recovery. If the patient's doctors are lying about the results of an ultrasound scan, the patient's life is imperiled. This is the reality.
11. Yet, pictures don't lie. The scans themselves represent critical evidence.
Answer: They do -- which is precisely why the FBI should not be erasing them for future reference.
12. The FBI appears to have taken on the role of arbiter over which Americans are entitled to their lives.
Answer: Yes, it has. And this is the inherent problem with Christopher Wray's "disposition matrix." The FBI should not be making decisions to end the lives of law-abiding American citizens. Period. Human rights should not be contingent upon politics, race, gender, religious preference, or relationship to an FBI whistleblower. The compliance of the American electorate should not be the price it has to pay to draw its next breath.
13. Can your older son survive without a truthful acknowledgement of the crimes of the FBI in this case?
Answer: I don't believe so, no. Alveolar schistosomiasis typically acts like a liver cancer, with cysts proliferating and metastasizing. Without diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis is dire.
14. What should the FBI do in this case?
Answer: The FBI should allow my son's doctors to tell the truth about his health. They should allow his referral to the appropriate specialists. And they should allow him to receive the best possible care.
15. Is the agency likely to do those things?
Answer: Given that the agency fears being implicated in a crime of first-degree murder, no. Instead the agency is likely to continue its attempt to portray my son as a threat to the community in a hope of harming him yet further.
16. Would there ever be a situation in which the intentional transmission of alveolar schistosomiasis could be justified?
Answer: No.
17. Is our national security enhanced by the serious illness of law-abiding American citizens?
Answer: No.
18. Is the FBI fulfilling its mandate as either a federal law enforcement agency or a national security agency in preying upon law-abiding Americans, regardless of their political party?
Answer: No.
19. Should FBI agents be empowered to commit murder against law-abiding American citizens with impunity?
Answer: No.
20. If the FBI's crimes of falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public persist, can our democracy survive?
Answer: No.
21. Is the FBI leadership protecting the Constitution when they direct their employees to harm and defame their fellow Americans?
Answer: No.
22. Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?
Answer: I do.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment