OIG Hotline, please note that, during the composing of this post, the Wifi at my residence in Portola Valley was obstructed due to close-range signal blocking.
My husband, on trying to post this material on my behalf away from home, was also blocked from doing so.
This constitutes the third attempt to post this material on my blog.
Lane MacWilliams
***********************************************************************************
1. Recently, far right factions of the FBI appear to have been working overtime to falsely accuse your family members and yourself of anything other than lawful conduct. Why the sudden escalation in that effort?
Answer: I believe I have caught FBI Agent Txx Lxxxx in a crime of attempted first-degree murder against my family in the intentional exposure to echinococcus mutilocularis. This act is clearly indefensible, and I'm sure it renders far-right segments of the agency fearful of public exposure for their crimes against the law-abiding American public.
2. Did the FBI attempt to expose your younger son and his girlfriend to echinococcus multilocularis as well?
Answer: I did receive that allegation, in the context of a false assertion Txx Lxxxx was making regarding a far-fetched story that liver cysts are some familial condition for us.
3. You have never had liver cysts in your family before.
Answer: Absolutely not.
4. If your husband has liver cysts, that would disprove Txx Lxxxx' false allegation.
Answer: Yes, and if my cat, Oliver, had echinococcus multilocularis, that would disprove it, too. But beyond this, my older son is quite ill currently, and I believe a prompt ultrasound will reveal the cause to be echinococcus multilocularis.
5. You have been told that the FBI has directed local law enforcement to break into your home while your husband is away this next week, with the specific intention of causing you grievous bodily harm.
Answer: Yes, I have.
6. You have been told to fortify your home against forced entry, have you not?
Answer: I have. But I would like to reiterate that I am a peaceable, law-abiding civilian without law enforcement training and without aspirations of law enforcement training. And, in my opinion, the lives of peaceable civilians should not be rendered into violent video game fodder for the criminal far right.
7. You are referring to the FBI's capacity -- albeit in direct violation of the Constitution -- to film you in your own home.
Answer: I am, yes.
8. How could the FBI -- or the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office -- justify a home invasion at this time?
Answer: The agency could pay a corrupt ER physician like Dr. Christopher Campbell to sign his name to a false statement saying he thought my son and I represented a danger to the community in some manner. He could falsely allege drug use, for example. He could falsely allege a reference to weapons in some context. The possibilities are endless when a physician is abusing his access to patients through lying about them for federal authorities.
Frankly, if Dr. Christopher Campbell had told any lies that were less appalling than these extreme examples, I don't think we would have had an escort home on Thursday night from a series of San Mateo County Sheriff's Office vehicles.
I did record the conclusion of our conversation with Dr. Christopher Campbell, so I don't think his lies can be sustained. But that's assuming that my recordings are not taken from my home.
I would just like to point out the simple fact that, if an ER physician in a Santa Clara County hospital were truly in a fearful situation, he would call 911 and Santa Clara County police would arrive and speak with the individual in question directly.
9. But that's not what happened on Thursday night when you left O'Connor Hospital.
Answer: No. Every law enforcement vehicle I saw was a San Mateo County Sheriff's Office vehicle. And no law enforcement officer attempted to speak to me, nor did they attempt to speak to my son. These cruisers simply followed us most of the way home, breaking off at Portola Rd. just prior to passing the license plate cameras.
10. Is it ominous that you are being followed by San Mateo County Sheriff's Office vehicles when it was corrupt Sheriff's Deputy Rick Chaput who first appeared to cause so many problems with a falsified report of your stalking complaint?
Answer: Clearly. The San Mateo County Sheriff's Office is centrally implicated in this scheme of falsified law enforcement reporting as structured by the FBI. So, yes, I'm sure the SMC Sheriff's Office feels unhappy about the prospect of exposure.
11. How could corrupt SMC Sheriff's Office personnel justify harming you in a law enforcement raid?
Answer: They could enter the residence shooting, and then later utilize my thumbprint to open my handheld safe containing my means of self-defense in an emergency.
12. In other words, they could lie by saying that you were brandishing a weapon during a no-knock warrant.
Answer: I don't know whether no-knock warrants are legal in California, but I'm sure that would not slow down a corrupt group of SMC Sheriff's Office personnel.
13. Would they have the capacity to create AI-generated film showing you brandishing a weapon?
Answer: I have no doubt that this is within the FBI's capability.
14. Would they have the willingness to plant illicit substances in your residence in order to attempt to justify their crimes?
Answer: Easily.
15. Given these risks, is there some assurance you would like to extend here and now with regard to any entry by law enforcement personnel into your home?
Answer: Yes, first I would like to clarify that all my means of self-defense are sequestered within locked safes. Second, I would like to say that I will not be opening any safe whatsoever -- and nor will my husband -- in response to any interaction with law enforcement personnel. Third, I would like to reiterate that I have never used illicit substances, nor has my husband, nor has my son.
16. What is it like to stand face-to-face with an ER doctor who, instead of helping your son access needed care, is determined to harm you through falsified witness statements and failure of the duty of care instead?
Answer: It's not an experience I would wish on anyone. There is a palpable cruelty in a doctor's act of turning away a suffering patient. This is not something I thought I would ever witness within the United States. The inhumanity of this act as perpetrated by Dr. Christopher Campbell at the direction of FBI personnel on Thursday evening -- this is something I will never forget.
Beyond this, when a physician has determined that he is going to lie about a conversation -- as I believe Dr. Christopher Campbell was determined to lie about his conversation with us -- there is a terrible malevolence he conveys through every word and gesture. In complete defiance of his role as a healer, such a person has decided to cause gratuitous harm. And that betrayal pervades the interaction with distrust, guardedness, and suspicion -- this, when my son was experiencing debilitating abdominal pain and trustfully seeking help.
This is the type of unjustifiable malfeasance on the part of a physician that can lead a young man to determine never to make himself vulnerable to a doctor again, no matter his physical pain or suffering.
17. So, now, you have a young man at home who is gaunt, jaundiced, and suffering from an unknown number of cysts on critical organs -- and also determined not to ask for help.
Answer: All true.
18. Is there anyone who can help your family members to safely access necessary medical care on an immediate basis?
Answer: This is the question for which I am hoping I will soon have an answer.
19. Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?
Answer: I do.
Lane MacWilliams
*************************************************************************************
The FBI is a deeply divided agency. There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment. The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general. As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance. The rule of law must always be honored and upheld. It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of all Americans that renders the United States a democracy. We must never abandon this promise. All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.
No comments:
Post a Comment