What Is the Effect on our Democracy of the FBI's Perpetration of Defamation?

 1.  Your stalker recently conveyed to you that a defamatory video co-opting your likeness was being distributed at FBI direction on the "dark web."

Answer:  Yes, he did.

2.  What are your thoughts about an FBI that would undertake this kind of defamation while drawing pay from the national treasury in the name of federal law enforcement and the national security interest?

Answer:  I believe that our nation's respect for the truth is necessary for our democracy to endure.  If far right segments of the FBI are acting in accordance with the directives of a foreign adversary, we need to fully understand the nature of that compromise.  How can we best address an assault on the Constitution by the very agency that has vowed to defend and protect it?  Perhaps through a commission selected to investigate the crimes committed by far right segments of the agency in their entirety.

3.  Does the FBI appear to be using one or more AI-generated videos as a means of attempting to silence you as a whistleblower of FBI malfeasance?

Answer:  Absolutely.  Yes.  The agency appears to be saying, "Do what we instruct you to do, or we will defame you as a predator and a reprobate online, and your life will never be the same."

4.  Is this video, which the FBI has utilized to defame you for years, something you have actually seen?

Answer:  No, I have never had access to it in any way, shape or form.

5.  Yet, you know it exists.

Answer:  I have been informed by others that it does.

6.  You have also been informed by others that the FBI has distributed surveillance video of you and your family members in private moments inside your own home.

Answer:  Yes, I have.

7.  Your thoughts?

Answer:  This surely meets the definition of a dystopia.  I think the American electorate needs to consider whether we are comfortable living in a surveillance state, paid for by our tax dollars, in which the FBI and affiliated agencies have assumed totalitarian control over the social, financial, and political future of the nation.  That means no further access to self-determination by the American voter.  No free speech.  No freedom of assembly.  No freedom of the press.  

8.  And doesn't it also mean that our fundamental human rights are abrogated as well?

Answer:  It does, yes.  Because defamation is, as I have said before, a prelude, accompaniment and postlude to financial and physical harms.

9.  You believe that FBI affiliates have been committing violent crimes against the law-abiding American public through the implementation of the FBI's "disposition matrix."

Answer:  I think many others have established that these crimes are being committed.  But the American electorate as a whole does not know about them.  And that's a tremendous problem for our democracy.

10.  Why?

Answer:  Because the American public is going to have immense difficulty defending itself from covert aggression being perpetrated by a federal law enforcement agency.  The means, motive, and manifestation of these harms remains, for the vast majority of people, entirely unknown.  

11. Is it easier for Americans to believe that whistleblowers are delusional than that our entire democracy has been placed at risk by the corruption of programs within the FBI and affiliated agencies?

Answer:  It's always easier for society to believe that those who are experiencing a violation of their civil liberties and human rights somehow deserve it.  But the democracy requires more of us.  

And the secret to the freedom of mankind resides within the realization that if we fail to stand up for the rights of others, we forfeit our own.

12.  There's no "greater good" within totalitarianism.  This is your point.

Answer:  That's right.  There's no end that justifies the means of totalitarianism.  Freedom for a few does not result from enslavement for many.  History makes this quite clear.  

Democracy is built on principle, honor, and respect for our fellow citizens.  These gifts are not an accident.  They are enshrined within our founding documents as a nation.

13.  In other words, if our neighbor isn't free, we're not really free either.

Answer:  That's correct.  Democracy requires that we care about one another's right to self-determination.

14.  And it also requires that we care about the truth.

Answer:  Yes.  None of us can be free without access to the truth.  This would be my one addition to the U.N.'s Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  Citizens deserve access to the truth -- even and especially when that truth is difficult to accept, as in the fact that far right segments of the FBI are knowingly perpetrating falsified law enforcement reporting against law-abiding American citizens.

That means that the far right's crimes against the American electorate need to be exposed in their entirety.

15.  How can defamation best be opposed?

Answer:  By the insistence of good people in speaking the truth of their character, their integrity, and their actions.

16.  Victims of the far right's defamation cannot be silent.

Answer:  No.  They need to express themselves with great conviction and indefatigability.  

17.  What happens when that determined pursuit of the truth places a law-abiding "target of interest" in harm's way?

Answer:  Courage is called for.  Courage for our families.  Courage for our neighbors.  Courage for our country.

18.  You have not found the limits of your courage, despite the predations of far right segments of the FBI against you and your family members.  

Answer:  No.

19.  Txx Lxxxx has allegedly threatened your son with a DEW assault designed to cause brain damage.

Answer:  Txx Lxxxx is answerable to me for the crimes he has already committed against my family.  I don't recommend that he compound his problems by perpetrating more.

20.  You would like to convey to individuals on the far right within the FBI that we are all accountable for our actions.

Answer:  This is not merely my opinion, but rather a centerpiece of a free and just society.  

21.  Can our democracy be rescued through an insistence on that accountability from the FBI?

Answer:  We're in the process of finding out.  Those of us who love this country will not stop asking that question until we become part of a reassuring answer.

Lane MacWilliams

************************************************************************************

The FBI is a deeply divided agency.  There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment.  The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general.  As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance.  The rule of law must always be honored and upheld.  It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of all Americans that renders the United States a democracy.  We must never abandon this promise. All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.

Threats of Law Enforcement Raid

OIG Hotline, this is to document that I am in receipt of renewed threats of an imminent law-enforcement raid, allegedly to be perpetrated at our Portola Valley home.  I am not informed of the purported justification for such an action, except that I continue to receive indications that the FBI persists in extending false allegations regarding "espionage" activity, perhaps in an attempt to defend the malfeasance of FBI employee Txx Lxxxx, whom I have named on my blog.

I am informed that virtually any phone call in which I engage is currently likely to be mischaracterized as "dangerous," "suspicious," or "threatening," when in fact my conversations with others are entirely peaceable.

I do document my phone calls in their entirety in an attempt to prevent falsified witness statements as directed by the FBI.

And I do possess this documentation for the review of OIG Hotline investigators at any time.

One always hopes that the truth will be protective.

But, clearly, malevolent actors who engage in online impersonation and demand falsified witness statements can perpetrate rather limitless harms.

This documentation serves as my defense.

I welcome contact from OIG Hotline investigators at the earliest opportunity, as it would appear that far right segments of the FBI are beginning to feel panicked over potential exposure of their compromise.

It has been suggested that the first set of affidavits which I faxed to your Office were partially obstructed.  Accordingly, I will attempt to resend this material, in addition to new affidavits for your review.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

I thank you most heartily for your ongoing presence in this investigation. 

Lane MacWilliams

************************************************************************************

The FBI is a deeply divided agency.  There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment.  The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general.  As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance.  The rule of law must always be honored and upheld.  It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of all Americans that renders the United States a democracy.  We must never abandon this promise. All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.

A Quest to Interrupt the FBI's Plan to Perpetrate Harm Through the Falmouth Water Department

OIG Hotline investigators, it appears that the FBI is co-opting the Falmouth Water Department in a plan to rebuild the water main curb stop at 40 Gansett Rd. as a means of extending future harm to the residents of the property.

I spoke to the Town of Falmouth Public Works Department at 508-457-2543, and was told the following information on a recorded line:

"As of January 1st, if a plumber turns the water on at the street -- or off -- and breaks the curb stop, the homeowner is responsible for the repair, which is a two thousand dollar fee.  So, most plumbers will no longer turn the water on or off at the street anymore.  It is a deterrent to try and have the plumbers not do that because a lot of them are not, you know, they're not skilled enough to do that properly without breaking the curb stop.  So we are encouraging plumbers and homeowners to call the Water Department directly and have us turn the water on and off."

Following this conversation, I received information that Panton Plumbing had been directed by FBI personnel to intentionally break the curb stop at my family home at 40 Gansett Rd., with the specific intention that the Falmouth Water Department would then "rebuild" the water main valve in order to allow for various harms to residents at the property as directed by the FBI.

What do those harms include?  High levels of ionizing radiation?  Water contaminated with pathogens known to be severely hazardous to human health?  Chemical contamination?

I believe this circumstance may present an important opportunity for OIG Hotline investigators to ascertain the means of the FBI's compromise of law-abiding Americans' water utility access.

Cal Water has already torn up the street and rebuilt the water main valve access to my home in Portola Valley, in a manner unlike any other water main curb stop on my street.  It would appear, given the various harms that my family has experienced through contaminated water, that the FBI was involved in directing that process.

But the Falmouth Water Division has not yet rebuilt the water main curb stop at 40 Gansett Rd., Woods Hole, MA.

It seems that this would be the perfect time for investigators to assess the FBI's communications with this public utility, including the agency's specific instructions for the rebuilding of this valve at the street.

Given that the implications for the welfare of other Americans through public water utilities are so far-reaching, please intervene if you are able.

I include herewith an email I sent to the Falmouth Water Department this morning.  I will attempt to place this information in notarized affidavit form within one week.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

************************************************************************************

Email sent to: dpw@falmouthma.gov. From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. Date: May 31, 2023 at 11:29 AM

Re:  Formal Requests of the Falmouth Water Department Re: 40 Gansett Rd., Woods Hole, MA

To the Falmouth Water Department:

I have one immediate request of the Falmouth Water Department prior to your going to my property at 40 Gansett Rd.

1.  Please forward to me a written copy of the Falmouth Water Department's new Town policy stating that plumbers cannot turn on/off water at the street, and that there will be a $2,000 fine to the homeowner if the "curb stop" is broken.

I am informed that the Falmouth Water Department has been in communication with the FBI/Infragard concerning my property.  Allegedly, FBI personnel have instructed you to rebuild the water main curb stop at my home in order to allow future means of harm to be extended to the residents of the home through water access at the street.

I know something about this process, as it was already perpetrated by the water company at my main address.

I cannot recommend that the Falmouth Water Department incur the myriad liabilities involved with acceding to the FBI's request.

I would like to have photographs of the current condition of the water main curb stop at 40 Gansett Rd., please.

And I would like to have your full disclosure concerning the directives the FBI has extended to your Department concerning my property.  This is a safety issue both for my family and for any others who will reside in the home through future rentals or sale of the property.

Please be apprised that I will be sharing this communication with the Investigations Division of the Office of the Inspector General Hotline which is currently investigating FBI malfeasance in the form of falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives.  Because I stand as a whistleblower of the FBI's corruption of the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and the agency's affiliated "target of interest" program, FBI personnel have, unfortunately, assumed a predatory stance toward my family and my property.

I ask that the Falmouth Water Department refuse to aid and abet their criminal intent.

Instead, I request that your personnel insist on transparency and accountability in all services provided by your Department.

I look forward to hearing from you in detail concerning the matter delineated above.

Thank you for your ethical engagement with this issue,

Lane MacWilliams

Documentation of a Spoofed Phone Call, May 31, 2023 at 8:40 AM

 OIG Hotline, please be apprised that, during a phone call from my cell phone (xxx-xxx- 1467) a few minutes ago with my husband, a caller with the ID of "Amazon Delivery" cut into the line.  The interrupting call was in fact a dead line, with no voice speaking whatsoever.  I happened to be using my digital audio recorder at the time, so this "dead call" was inadvertently documented via my audio device.

Because the FBI has actively utilized spoofed phone calls to perpetrate falsified law enforcement reporting against law-abiding American citizens, I believe the documentation of this call to be important.

The number associated with this "Amazon Delivery" call was (206) 453-2329.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

KPM 5/28/2023

 OIG Hotline, the following testament from my husband is herewith transcribed for ease of reading:

May 31, 2023

This is to verify that my wife Lane MacWilliams and I saw Dr. Theresa Chan of PAMF Urgent Care on Sunday, May 28, 2023.

The reason for our visit was that my wife was experiencing unexplained GI symptoms.

While at PAMF, we learned that my wife's blood pressure was markedly elevated as well.

Due to the fact that my wife had received threats of parasite exposure, we had a high suspicion that a GI parasite was the cause of her feeling unwell.

Dr. Chan examined my wife in my presence, finding that the lymph nodes in her neck were somewhat swollen.

Dr. Chan palpated my wife's abdomen twice, but found no abnormalities by touch.  Dr. Chan mentioned that no lymph nodes were swollen in that area and there were no other abnormalities either.

Dr. Chan did not recommend an ultrasound to my wife.  She never mentioned that this was indicated for any reason.

Dr. Chan expressed a lack of knowledge about IgG testing for parasites and had too many technical difficulties with her computer to order the IgG testing while we were with her.

She did recommend O&P testing, but my wife and I told her that we would order both tests on our own.

My wife made no mention of the FBI during our visit, but rather, focused on her clinical symptoms.

Following our visit with Dr. Chan on Sunday, I found a seller of a NordicTrack exerciser in San Jose, a workout machine my wife had requested for Mother's Day, and my wife and I traveled to San Jose together to examine the NordicTrack and complete the purchase.  The seller, a man named Norman Jew, appeared to be managing the sale for an absent neighbor.

All of our interactions with Dr. Chan and Mr. Jew on Sunday were honorable, respectful, and law-abiding in all respects.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Kenneth P. MacWilliams                                                          5-31-2023

When the FBI Wields Rumors of Cancer

1.  You have been informed that one of the ways in which Dr. Theresa Chan was persuaded by the FBI to falsely report about you related to her statement that she recommended an ultrasound exam to you, which you allegedly refused.

Answer:  Dr. Chan did not recommend an ultrasound exam to me at any time during my appointment with her.  My husband will back me up on that fact.

2.  Did Dr. Chan tell you that she felt no abnormalities when she palpated your abdomen?

Answer:  Yes.  No swollen glands.  No enlarged organs.  She checked twice, which was fairly remarkable to me.  And she confirmed that there were no abnormalities at all.

3.  So, you're not dying of cancer, as the FBI has alleged to others?

Answer:  No, I'm not.  

Due to apparent far right malfeasance, I contracted a GI parasite that, though likely rare, is entirely curable.  And I look forward to receiving objective confirmation of my diagnosis.

4.  Why have you disclosed so many personal details about this illness?

Answer:  So that far right FBI personnel cannot get away with lying about what has transpired.

5.  LabCorp is signatory to Infragard.  Can you expect legitimate results from this company?

Answer:  It would be best to combine LabCorp's testing with an at-home test that is independent of external influences.

6.  Has your attempt to purchase an at-home test been obstructed?

Answer:  So far, after one call from me and two calls from my husband, it appears to have been obstructed, yes.

7.  What if you're in a situation in which you do not have access to objective diagnostics nor to evidence-based medical treatment to address that diagnosis?

Answer:  It would not be the first time.

8.  You believe that you can get well regardless of the obstruction perpetrated by FBI personnel at this point.

Answer:  I do, yes.  Fortunately, my visit to PAMF revealed the sharply elevated blood pressure, so I have a good idea of the particular parasite involved.

9.  Is it acceptable to be guessing about your health in this manner?

Answer:  It's not a sign of a healthy preservation of civil liberties within our society, no.  But whistleblowers have to be alert and resilient.  I look forward to the day when the FBI is kicked out of the doctors' offices they've been haunting.

10.  What do you mean by "kicked out"?

Answer:  I mean shown the door.  I cannot think of a circumstance in which FBI personnel should be violating the safety and privacy of any "target" whatsoever by obstructing objective medical care for American citizens.

11.  Is your son's FBI handler, Txx Lxxxx, orchestrating the obstruction of your medical care from within the FBI?

Answer:  I am informed that he is.

12.  Is this a kind of "payback" in his mind for your revelations concerning the medical status of some FBI personnel who have been in direct, personal contact with your stalker?

Answer:  I wouldn't conjecture on that point, except to say that Mr. Lxxxx strikes me as a man who could possibly hold onto resentments.

13.  Is it your understanding that he is also coordinating the current HAARP tasking through Canadian Air Force contacts?

Answer:  Mr. Lxxxx has contacts within the DoD, who in turn have contacts with those in Canada.

14.  Should HAARP be deployed by the DoD's affiliates in an effort to cause heart attack in FBI whistleblowers?

Answer:  The effort is fraught, and all the more so because it has been identified in advance.

15.  How would you characterize the struggle between democracy and autocracy at this time?

Answer:  Our technologies have outpaced our collective wisdom as a species.  We need to consider whether we wish for peaceable civilian life supported by our duly elected representatives to hold the central position of honor within our society, allowing our preserved human rights to be protected by the military-intelligence complex at the periphery -- or whether, on the other hand, we wish for militarized rule to hold the fundamental seat of power within our country, with civilians asked to subordinate their individual rights to that autocratic system.

Is our choice going to be mutual and peaceable civilian progress for the whole of society?

Or is it going to be exclusive privileges claimed by those few within the military-intelligence complex who can extend threats to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for everyone else?

16.  Do members of the American public understand that this choice is before them?

Answer:  No, they truly don't.  Not as a whole.  The technologies currently being used to surveil the law-abiding American public are being deployed without the public's awareness or consent.  The bid for control by the far right continues to represent an attempted "coup from above" characterized by a form of surveillance capitalism through which the public cannot easily perceive the means by which they have been rendered without power, without voice.

17. Is it possible to educate the public rapidly enough for them to insist that democracy prevails?

Answer:  That's what we're in the process of finding out.

President Biden has given us a chance to alert the public about this inflection point for democracy.  

And there are heroes within the OIG Hotline and the ODNI leadership who are striving with all their might to characterize the truth of this matter.

18.  Are you still working on affidavits?

Answer:  I will be turning my attention back to another set of affidavits for the OIG Hotline, yes.

19.  Are you going to make a full recovery from this recent GI illness, which was apparently caused by FBI malfeasance?

Answer:  Yes, I am.

20.  No trips to the emergency room?

Answer:  Decidedly not.

21.  Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?

Answer:  Yes, I do.

Lane MacWilliams

Receipt Sunday, May 28, 2023

 OIG Hotline investigators, this is the receipt from Norm Jew, signed by him on Saturday, May 27, 2023 when my husband and I purchased a NordicTrack from him at 7351 Phinney Way in San Jose.

All of our interactions with Mr. Jew on Saturday, as always with others, were lawful and honorable in every regard.

I hereby certify that this information is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

************************************************************************************

Restricted Access: OIG Hotline Investigators Only

This content is intended for the OIG Hotline only.

All others are asked to exit this post at this time.

Lane MacWilliams

**********************************************************************************

OIG Hotline investigators, I have included below my recent messages to Dr. Theresa Chan of Palo Alto Medical Foundation Urgent Care, dated May 29, 2023.

I include the messages in their entirety, as they may assist in setting the record straight with regard to any falsified witness statements provided by Dr. Chan at the directive of FBI personnel or her direct employer.

I will place this information into an affidavit as soon as I am able.

Further, my husband will corroborate these details in a statement of his own.

In addition, this visit was thoroughly documented at the time of the visit itself on Sunday, May 28, 2023.

Thank you for allowing me to document this information with your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

***********************************************************************************

 

Restricted Access: For OIG Hotline Investigators Only

 Email sent to; lanemacwilliams@gmail.com.  From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. Date: May 29, 2023 at 3:22 AM

Re:  Allegedly Falsified Witness Statements by "Amy" at PAMF Urgent Care

This is to document that I am in receipt of specific threats that PAMF Urgent Care's intake person -- allegedly named "Amy"  -- is being actively pressured to file a falsified witness statement for FBI personnel regarding my visit on Saturday.

"Amy," took my blood pressure and asked why I needed to see a physician.  I explained to her that I believed I had had a parasite exposure, without going into the details that the FBI had caused it.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

************************************************************************************

When FBI Personnel Intentionally Render "Targets" Ill

 1.  What is your perspective on the FBI's apparent contamination of your food and water with the intention of causing serious illness?

Answer:  Other than that it's the most cowardly, covert, unconscionable attempt to silence a whistleblower I have heard of outside of, say, intentionally elevating exposures to ionizing radiation?

2.  Yes, outside of the FBI's previous crimes against your family.

Answer:  I think it's necessary for the American people to grasp that the far right is conducting itself in a manner that is consistent with covert physical aggression.  In response, it is necessary to hold to the rule of law and peaceable redress.

3.  Why do you feel that way?

Answer:  Far right factions of the FBI really hope to push their "targets" to the point of distress, anger, exhaustion, fear, and exasperation -- all in the hope that they can use a reaction to their predations as "evidence" that "targets: are "dangerous" people who deserve surveillance and harm.

It's necessary to deny them their goal.

"Targets of interest" must respond to aggression with calm disclosure.

"Targets of interest" must respond to lies with rational reference to the truth.

"Targets of interest" must respond to predation with reasoned exposure of the far right's crimes to the American public.

4.  You have received threats for six weeks or so relating to intentional parasite exposure by the FBI.

Answer:  Six weeks and longer.

5.  And what did those threats look like?

Answer:  They included the actual words "Parasite," "Eggs,"  "Restaurant," "Incubation,". "The Host," "Chest Burster," as exemplified in material I include below:

6.  At the same time, you started seeing online advertisements for medication you had never heard of before, such as Praziquantel, isn't that true?

Answer:  It is true.  I had never heard of Praziquantel before, and suddenly, it was being advertised every time I opened my computer.

7.  And what is Praziquantel?

Answer:  It is the first-line treatment for schistosomiasis.

8.  And you believe you may have schistosomiasis, based on your symptoms?

Answer:  Schistosomiasis is the only parasite that dramatically elevates blood pressure.  So, yes, I think it's quite possible.

9.  You have said that you've arranged for testing independent of any physician.  Why is that?

Answer:  A corrupt physician can cause an astonishing number of problems to a patient who is searching for private and safe medical care.  And the FBI appears to have an extremely convincing approach in stating to physicians that their cooperation is needed in a matter of "national security."

10.  Yet, that's a lie, isn't it?  Isn't the only "security" that's at risk the far right's "security"?

Answer:  Yes.  FBI agents have no business interfering in the medical care of any American citizen, and, I would argue, any foreign citizen either.  The fact that FBI agents have liberally extended false accusations that "targets" are engaged in "espionage" activity or "terrorist" activity represents an unconscionable exploitation of the powers the agency was granted within the Patriot Act -- and a remarkable misuse of the tools the agency wields within the Espionage Act as well.

11.  But given the FBI's misuse of these Acts, you don't feel that you can readily extend trust to a doctor whom you might consult.

Answer:  You know, sometimes a doctor is trying to be protective in not ordering necessary testing for you.  If they are aware of a plan to expose you to yet another pathogen through invasive testing, they might demure.  Their computer might suddenly "freeze."  This is sometimes their way of refusing to participate in a plan of harm.  It's necessary to give people the benefit of the doubt.

12.  But the end result is that necessary testing is not available to you.

Answer:  That's true.  In this case, I was able to order testing independently, though I'm not sure if that, too, will be obstructed.

13.  Why do you say that?

Answer:  Confirmation of my order that will allow me to pick up the tests themselves has been withheld so far.

14.  You think that confirmation may not come?

Answer:  We'll see.

15.  You actually managed to locate an at-home test for schistosomiasis, and you reached out to the company that provides it.  Do you believe your access to that test might be obstructed as well?

Answer:  We'll see.  If it is obstructed, I will be writing about that here.

16.  Why would the FBI want to prohibit your access to basic medical testing regarding the medical problem they have caused?

Answer:  First, they don't want to get caught.  A definitive diagnosis of GI schistosomiasis is a big problem for FBI personnel.  Second, they hope to drive whistleblowers into circumstances in which they are dependent on medical providers for their care, opening up the possibility of falsified witness statements by medical personnel, alongside active harm.

17.  What are you associations with schistosomiasis?

Answer:  The developing world.  Africa.  I once had a friend who had spent two years with the Peace Corps in Kinshasa, in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo.  She described to me the horrors of schistosomiasis in a way I will never forget.

18.  And your symptoms are gastrointestinal?

Answer:  Yes, they are.  In addition to the GI concerns, there is dramatically elevated blood pressure, as I've said.

19.  Do you feel that your situation is urgent due to the blood pressure concerns?

Answer:  You know, I really cannot contextualize the urgency of the situation.  Would I benefit from objective, expert, engaged, private, safe medical care at this time?  That would be an emphatic yes.  Does it appear that, having caused this illness, the FBI is now obstructing that care?  That would be another overwhelming yes.

But I don't feel qualified to comment on the urgency of this circumstance.  

I can simply say that I'm attempting to move forward rationally and judiciously, given the apparent risks involved in seeking help.

20.  What should happen to the FBI personnel who intentionally exposed you to this parasite?

Answer:  I believe in the rule of law.  The rule of law matters not only in the legal code itself, but also in the question of how rigorously that code is enforced.  Far right FBI personnel believe that they act with impunity, even and especially when they are violating the Constitution they have vowed to uphold.  Behind their outer guise of engagement, there is contempt for the American electorate.  If our democracy is to be rescued from the far right's schemes, we really need to calmly insist that the rule of law still matters, and that it does, in fact, apply to those who carry badges and wield the public trust.

Remember the Latin phrase, "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"  Who will watch the watchers?

The answer is none other than we ourselves.

21.  Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?

Answer:  I do.

Lane MacWilliams

************************************************************************************

The FBI is a deeply divided agency.  There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment.  The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general.  As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance.  The rule of law must always be honored and upheld.  It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of all Americans that renders the United States a democracy.  We must never abandon this promise. All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.

Second Update: Restricted Access: For OIG Hotline Investigators Only

Second Update:  OIG Hotline investigators, I am informed that FBI affiliates may have exposed me, through contaminated food and water, to more than one GI pathogen at once, GI schistosomiasis among them.  

Beyond this, I have been warned that it is currently unsafe for me to attempt to undertake serological testing due to the attendant risks of exposure to yet more serious illnesses.  Perhaps this was the reason for Dr. Chan's "computer malfunction" when it came time to order testing on my behalf.  

My best options at this time are to undertake non-invasive testing.  Fortunately, I have been able to arrange for this testing to be conducted even without a physician to guide that process.  (I did ultimately speak to a K Health physician this morning, who expressed that my blood pressure was, in her view, life threatening at 140/90 and who asked me to go to an emergency room.)

What is the takeaway here?  It appears that the FBI's threats to contaminate my food and water were in fact manifested through restaurant worker and/or Cal Water employee malfeasance.

It seems that the FBI is eager to force "targets of interest" to seek active medical care, at which point, with any invasive procedure, a "target" becomes eminently vulnerable.

I understand that the FBI is eager to mischaracterize my conduct, my integrity, my virtue, and my honesty -- and certainly, to compromise my health.   I'm simply not sympathetic to that attempt.

I will be sharing with the OIG Hotline my follow up communications with Dr. Chan, as well as with the K Health physician this morning.

It goes without saying that these actions on the part of FBI personnel are malevolent in the extreme.

It's worth recalling that my husband suffered from E. coli poisoning in 2022, an unprecedented event among any member of our family, and certainly, life-threatening.

My stalker appeared to "take credit" for that illness, in addition to my current GI illness.

It's worth restating that, while Russian-affiliated organized crime members may well wish to harm the health of law-abiding American citizens, the FBI should not be helping them.

The lies and predations being perpetrated by the FBI's far right are designed unmake our nation, not to save it.

And the perpetrators of these harms should be fully prosecuted under the law.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

**********************************************************************************

Update:  OIG Hotline investigators, I am informed that my sudden high blood pressure and GI symptoms have been caused by intentional exposure to schistosomiasis by FBI affiliates and at FBI directives.

I am attempting to access adequate medical testing to assess this allegation in addition to appropriate followup treatment at this time.

It would assist me if the FBI personnel responsible for this situation would not obstruct basic testing ordered by a physician.  There is a highly accurate antibody test for schistosomiasis, which would be appropriate given these circumstances.

The failure of Dr. Theresa Chan of PAMF Urgent Care to order basic testing yesterday, given my symptoms, does not meet the most fundamental standard of a physician's commitment to render care.  I do not believe this omission was at her initiative.

I have requested that K Health, an online medical provider, order the appropriate tests for schistosomiasis on an immediate basis, including Quest's specific antibody test #34306.  But FBI obstruction of my access to this testing will only slow the process down and implicate the agency further.

Perhaps if I lived in Zaire, a schistosomiasis test would be available to me.  

What does it say about the FBI's Counterintelligence Division that, as a law-abiding American citizen living in Northern California, I am being denied access to necessary medical care for an illness of the FBI's own design?

I would appreciate your assistance in this matter.

Lane MacWilliams

***********************************************************************************

OIG Hotline investigators, this afternoon, my husband and I visited a PAMF Urgent Care facility in Mountain View and spoke to Dr. Theresa Chan about GI symptoms I have been experiencing that are symptomatic of parasitic infection.

Of concern, my stalker has suggested that he and his affiliates within the FBI have tampered with my family's restaurant food over the last several months.  

Dr. Chan raised suspicions of compromise when she declined to order basic testing.  In addition, she repeatedly suggested referring me to an infectious disease specialist, while a GI specialist would have constituted the appropriate speciality.

My husband and I determined that we would need to order appropriate tests independently.

Due to the FBI's consistent co-opting of the physicians of "targets of interest," it appears necessary to exercise great care in consulting with any doctor concerning any medical circumstance whatsoever.

The likelihood that Dr. Chan will be importuned to provide a falsified witness statement pertaining to what should have been a private medical consult is substantive.

Later in the afternoon, my husband and I purchased a NordicTrack workout machine from a private seller, Norman Jew, at 7351 Phinney Way in San Jose, CA.  Mr. Jew behaved perfectly normally until the end of our transaction, at which point, he balked at the idea of supplying us with a receipt.  While I did convince him to do so, his behavior became yet more remarkable when he appeared, appropos of nothing, to wield his phone camera fairly aggressively as a surveillance device..  Unfortunately, it seems likely that Mr. Jew will be encouraged to supply a falsified witness statement for the FBI, as well.

I will request that my husband provide a statement of his own regarding these visits.  

I must say that, given that certain types of deceit on the part of the FBI and the witnesses it controls can lead to an unjustified law enforcement raid, this level of ongoing harassment by the FBI regarding our normal, respectful, law-abiding interactions in the wider world is deeply concerning.

Whistleblowers of the FBI's malfeasance are not "dangerous" or "suspicious" individuals.  They are people who are striving against the far right's commitment to disinformation in the hope of preserving the civil liberties and human rights of others.

Thank you for allowing me to document these events.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Permissions Granted to the Investigations Division of the Office of the Inspector General Hotline

To the Office of the Inspector General Hotline, Investigations Division:  

I wish to formally restate that, in the event of my disappearance, disability, or demise, I grant to the Investigations Division of the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice my full permission to render available to the American public any material with which I have directly provided your Office or the Office of Information Policy, or any material I have set aside for your Office within my files in my home.

One always hopes that such permissions will be unnecessary.  However, it seems wise to take this moment to clarify that, should any of the aforementioned adverse events occur, I place my full confidence in your judgement in determining what material to make available to the American electorate in the effort to illuminate the "insider threat" represented by the far right's engagement in falsified law enforcement reporting within the FBI and within law enforcement at the local level.

As part of this permission, should I be unable to make these determinations on my own due to my disappearance, disability, or demise, I specifically grant to your Office my permission for you to remove the confidential status of all materials which I have provided to you, with the following exceptions:

1.  protected health information pertaining to my family members, should they be living and capable of determining their own confidentiality preferences

2.  protected information concerning any professional colleagues of my family members, should my family members be living and capable of determining their own confidentiality preferences

In every case, I would request that your Office demonstrate a predisposition to "name the names" of those I have discussed within my notarized affidavits, in addition to all of my correspondence with your Office and the OIP which I have not yet had the opportunity to notarize.

Physicians and other medical professionals, lawyers, accountants, process servers, Superior Court clerks, banks, boat yards, neighbors, handymen, plumbers, judges, trainers  -- everyone who has participated in the far right's corrupt system of falsified law enforcement reporting under threat and/or in receipt of remuneration from the FBI in this case -- should be named publicly in an effort to illuminate how autocratic systems can advance without the broader public's awareness or consent.

Those FBI agents who have threatened my family members, friends, and acquaintances -- only one of whom I have identified on this blog -- should be named for the American public in a manner that allows the public to comprehend the deep betrayal of the Constitution which the far right has systematically perpetrated against law-abiding American citizens.

My family members, should they be living, should be strongly encouraged to grant waivers of confidentiality of their own, thus allowing the public to gain a more complete view of the far right's assaults against law-abiding American families in their totality.

Should my immediate family members not be living, for the purposes of this legal document, they should be assumed to have predeceased me.  In that eventuality, all confidentiality classifications on materials I have provided to you are to be removed, without exception.

My intent in clarifying these provisions at this time is to ensure that the American people have the opportunity to understand the methods currently being employed by far right FBI personnel and affiliates to gain economic and social control over the American public, in clear and present violation of fundamental Constitutional guarantees of Americans' cherished civil liberties.

Our freedoms can only survive the far right's "insider threat" to our democracy if the American electorate is awakened to the perils of autocratic governance, manifested in secret, in the name of the "national security interest."

In truth, our nation is most secure if we, the electorate, demonstrate great courage and generosity of spirit in preserving the civil liberties and human rights of one another, even when our defense of one another's rights places us at risk.

Our democracy is predicated on our commitment to the truth, on our benevolent commitment to care about the rights of other Americans to self-determination, on our compassion in strengthening the bonds of fellowship with our neighbors and friends, and on our integrity in holding to principled, lawful, civil discourse when we disagree.

Beyond all of these necessities, our democracy is dependent upon the soul of the nation as one committed to abundant goodwill, human kindness, virtuous effort, honest engagement, and justice tempered with mercy.

No one can diminish America's soul without the electorate's consent.

Somehow, I don't believe that the American electorate, once fully informed, will be willing to acquiesce to the far right's designs of harm against the innocent souls among us.

These permissions are granted of my own free will and accord.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

************************************************************************************

The FBI is a deeply divided agency.  There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment.  The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general.  As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance.  The rule of law must always be honored and upheld.  It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of all Americans that renders the United States a democracy.  We must never abandon this promise. All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.

Closure of All Active Connection to Wells Fargo Bank

OIG Hotline investigators, this morning, after multiple denials by phone by Wells Fargo personnel that any Visa card had been issued in my name, I was able to ascertain that the contrary was true.  A Visa card was, in fact, determined by Wells Fargo Customer Service Representative "Chandler" to be in the process of being issued in my name.  

The Wells Fargo Board apparently did nothing to prevent this from happening, despite my direct request.

The unexplained inaction of the Board notwithstanding, I was able to cancel this card, with number xxxx xxxxxx  x7696, prior to its being issued, activated, or mailed to me.  Wells Fargo Customer Service Representative "Chandler" stated that the card had merely been "in the process of the conversion" and was, at my direction, fully cancelled as of our conversation, which was documented in its entirety.

In order to ensure that my name has now been removed from all ongoing communications with Wells Fargo Bank, I sent the following email to Wells Fargo Banker Mr. Pedram Ghaderpanahi, of Los Altos, this morning.  

My closing communication to the Wells Fargo Board follows here as well.

I believe that Wells Fargo's actions (and failure to act) regarding the preservation of my privacy as a Wells Fargo customer remain a critical area of investigation for the OIG Hotline.  Certainly, Americans need advocacy and defense when it comes to predatory banking practices that reflect FBI directives pertaining to disinformation wielded at will against law-abiding bank customers.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*********************************************************************************

Email sent to: pedram.ghaderpanahi@wellsfargo.com. From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. Date: Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 9:25 AM

Re:  Formal Request for the Immediate Withdrawal of Any and All Complaints Associated with My Name

Dear Mr. Ghaderpanahi:

Thank you very much for your assistance at the Los Altos Branch of Wells Fargo Bank on Tuesday May 23, 2023.  At that time, as I'm sure you recall, you were attempting to ensure that all products and services associated with my name had been removed and discontinued from Wells Fargo Bank.

Thanks in part to your help, as well as that of Mr. Emmanuel Abrokwah, I believe that effort to now be complete.

At this time, I need to request that any and all complaints filed with Wells Fargo and associated with my name in any manner be withdrawn.

As you recall on the 23rd, I requested that no complaint be initiated on my behalf or in my name.

On Wednesday, May 24, 2023, however, Mr. Emmanuel Abrokwah, to my surprise, stated that a complaint had, in fact, been initiated in my name by you the day before.

Please understand that, while I sincerely hope Wells Fargo Bank is able to work through its challenges regarding its privacy policy, I can no longer be associated with Wells Fargo Bank in any manner whatsoever, including having my name associated with any complaint within the Bank.

I ask that you consider this communication a formal, legal request that any and all complaints associated with my name be immediately withdrawn.

To clarify, any such complaint was filed without my knowledge and permission, and in direct contravention of my instructions.

Please be apprised that this communication will be shared with the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice in order to ensure that investigators' information is complete.

Thank you very much for your immediate attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*************************************************************************************

Email sent to: boardcommunciations@wellsfargo.com. From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. Date: May 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM

Re:  Formal Request for the Immediate Withdrawal of Any and All Complaints Associated with My Name

To the Wells Fargo Board:

Please see my formal request below that Wells Fargo Banker Mr. Pedram Ghaderpanahi immediately withdraw any and all complaints initiated in my name or in any manner associated with my name.

Any such complaints were filed without my knowledge or permission, and against my express directives.

I hereby request that all prior communications with Wells Fargo's Executive Office or Board that could possibly be construed or interpreted as a "complaint" be immediately withdrawn from that designation.  I ask nothing further from the Wells Fargo Board at this time except its cooperation with the Investigations Division of the Office of the Inspector General Hotline, should investigators from this Office within the Department of Justice elect to follow up with Wells Fargo regarding their concerns.

It is my understanding at this time that I have successfully severed any and all connection to Wells Fargo Bank in any manner associated with my name or identity.  Accordingly, I wish to have no outstanding complaints with your Office or with any other department within the Bank.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Documentation of an Alleged FBI Contractor

OIG Hotline investigators, I have documented specific information regarding an alleged contractor hired by the FBI through a gmail sent to lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, lmacwilliams77419@gmail.com, and lmacwilliams7417@gmail.com at 2:39 PM this afternoon. 

Should it be necessary or desirable for you to access this information now or in the future, you have my full permission to do so.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

"Zersetzung" as Perpetrated by Far Right Factions of the FBI

1.  How seriously do you take the FBI's threats to burn down your family home on Cape Cod?

Answer:  I take them seriously, because far right segments of the FBI have already caused so much tangible harm to my family.

2.  When the FBI contacts a plumber like Jeff Bell (508-946-9800), with whom your husband has been in recent contact at your request, what tends to happen?

Answer:  After being contacted by the FBI, contractors will suddenly become accusatory, obstructive, and dishonest.  That's why I attempt to record my communications with contractors in writing.  If they later make false statements at the direction of their handlers, it is then possible to go back and reference what was written down.

3.  Plumber Jeff Bell is now declining to service your home until next week due to FBI interference.  Plumber Ron Laurino of Panton Plumbing has endangered your home insurance policy due to FBI interference.  FBI affiliates are threatening to engage in arson at your home involving active FBI communications with the Falmouth Fire Department.  And LaTanzi, Spalding and Landreth, a law firm which has become signatory to Infragard, appears to be waiting in the wings to file suit against you on behalf of Brian Von Herzen once the plan unfolds.

Does this appear to you to be the very definition of "gangstalking," or "Zersetzung,"  terms which are sometimes applied to the FBI's unconstitutional "target of interest" program?

Answer:  Absolutely.  It does.  Many people are asked to play a seemingly minor role in what is, in this case,  a plan of forced property divestment.  But the results of the dishonesty and corruption in total can be devastating.

4.  Why did you ask your husband to assist in making calls regarding this matter?

Answer:  There seems to be a push right now on the part of the FBI to misreport the nature of phone conversations with me, so my husband's engagement is extremely helpful.

5.  The FBI is attempting to discredit you as unreasonable or illogical, as it does with all "targets of interest."

Answer:  This is my understanding.

6.  How do you feel about the possible loss of your home in light of your efforts as an FBI whistleblower?

Answer:  First, I need to say that I hope it doesn't happen.  But second, I need to express that, in order to stand as a whistleblower in a circumstance as extreme as this one, it's really necessary to try to detach from earthly belongings and worldly concerns.  The far right is going to come after you on every level that they can.  And the truth is that malevolent people working in groups can wreak havoc with the tangibles of your life.  But they can't access your spirit if you don't allow it.  And that's what they're after.

This is why I resonate so much with President Biden's words regarding the struggle for the soul of the nation.

Those who support autocracy want to diminish and darken the great spirit of the United States as a nation.

And we really need to resist that with a determination that will not fail or tire or succumb.  For me, that determination is based on my faith.

Material things are impermanent.  But faith endures.

7.  You don't mean to offend anyone with that statement,  I'm sure.

Answer:  Absolutely not.  I'm talking about our capacity for kindness, compassion, engagement, and honesty as much as I am referencing a faith in God.  Our democracy is actually dependent upon our willingness to stand up for one another's civil liberties and human rights as passionately as we would defend our own.  There's a benevolence and a generosity of spirit that is required for our democracy to endure.  And, while we can't demand that of other people, we can exemplify it ourselves.

8.  You have also mentioned that the FBI has allegedly pressured Weatherly Dorris to sabotage the chain of your mooring.  This sounds like a small matter, but there's a 25-year wait for moorings in your hometown.  So, if you lose your mooring, you lose your ability to sail altogether.

Answer:  That's true.  Again, there's only so much you can control.  My mooring is probably worth a few hundred thousand dollars to a "purchaser," although technically, moorings cannot be bought and sold.  FBI personnel have no doubt found a way to profit from my mooring's reassignment.

9.  Again, we see a pattern of far right segments of the FBI acting in ways that are indistinguishable from organized crime.

Answer:  Yes.  It is alleged that FBI personnel are rewarded for bringing money into a central profit-sharing pool from which certain senior personnel draw profits.  There appears to be a powerful push to privatize profit through schemes funded by the national treasury.  

10.  Has the national treasury has been utilized by the FBI to perpetrate violations of the Constitution from which certain individuals within the agency personally profit?

Answer:  That is my understanding, but this question needs to be investigated thoroughly.

11.  What does it say about a nation when the private property of certain citizens is effectively appropriated for political objectives?

Answer:  Russia has been targeting the property of dissidents for a long time.  I'm sure the story is the same within China.  The only reason that far right segments of the FBI have been able to perpetrate these crimes within the United States is that they have been concealed as "secrets" connected to "national security."  

The answer lies within publicly exposing these schemes, all of which are predicated on underlying falsified law enforcement reporting.

Those who are profiting from preying upon law-abiding American citizens are not so enthusiastic about being held publicly accountable for that malfeasance.

So, it's necessary to speak out.

12.  Members of the far right would prefer to silence whistleblowers in any manner they can.

Answer:  Yes, so we need to gather our courage and speak out about the fact that the far right is fundamentally a criminal enterprise.

13.  What do you hope for in this situation?

Answer:  I hope to defend the civil liberties and human rights of other Americans alongside my own, and in so doing, to defend the United States from those who prefer autocratic rule over and above governance by our duly elected representatives.

14.  Do you feel this is likely?

Answer:  My mother always used to tell me to dream big dreams.  

The realization of big dreams is never likely, but if they are worthy dreams, our endeavors to realize them can ennoble and strengthen us.

Good people must never stop striving to defend those who cannot defend themselves.  Our human progress depends on our commitment to one another.

Is the exposure of the FBI's engagement in falsified law enforcement reporting likely? 

No, but it's necessary for our democracy to endure.  

So, it's a dream for which I will continue to dedicate everything I have.

Lane MacWilliams

***********************************************************************************

The FBI is a deeply divided agency.  There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment.  The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general.  As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance.  The rule of law must always be honored and upheld.  It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of all Americans that renders the United States a democracy.  We must never abandon this promise. All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.

Letter to the Managing Partner of LaTanzi, Spalding and Landreth

Email sent to: CWard@latanzi.com. From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com. Date: May 25, 2023 at 6:24 PM

Christopher, thank you for your email.

I understand that the firm is concerned by this situation, given the unlawful directives extended to it by FBI personnel.

Certainly, the circumstances are concerning for all of us who care about the rule of law, and I count myself foremost among them.

I cannot open a bank account under the name of the Realty Trust, because LaTanzi appears unwilling to disclose document deficits that may exist in the Realty Trust documents and filings.  Beyond this, if LaTanzi its aware of another Trustee of the Trust, but is withholding this information from me, I would be perjuring myself by presenting the Trust Certificate to a financial institution.

Beyond these concerns, LaTanzi's effective withdrawal of my representation at the directive of the FBI, and subsequent representation of my brother Brian Von Herzen, also at the directive of the FBI, is ethically troubling.

LaTanzi, Spalding, and Landreth did not originate these ethical lapses, but it did participate in them, and it did enter into a signatory status with Infragard in doing so.

What should occur at this time?

Exactly what we're missing:

Transparency and accountability.

Corrupt members of the FBI appear to be advancing a plan of forced property divestment regarding my family home at 40 Gansett Rd, Woods Hole, MA, and LaTanzi, Spalding, and Landreth appears to still be aiding and abetting them in that unlawful scheme.

Christopher, it's a hard lesson from history that totalitarianism tends to arrive with men wearing badges.  As law-abiding members of society, we seldom expect that they're lying to us.  That said, the FBI is, in fact, currently lying about a few million law-abiding American citizens through its unconstitutional "target of interest" program.

The heroes required to rescue us from the FBI's disastrous undermining of our civil liberties as Americans are none other than we ourselves.

I understand that you are not at liberty to reply to this email.

Please be apprised that I will be sharing this communication with the Investigations Division of the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice, together with a request that these events be investigated thoroughly in the interest of our democracy.

Sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

***********************************************************************************

The FBI is a deeply divided agency.  There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment.  The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general.  As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance.  The rule of law must always be honored and upheld.  It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of all Americans that renders the United States a democracy.  We must never abandon this promise. All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.

Notification from Google Indicating Likely IP Address Appropriation

OIG Hotline investigators, please be apprised of this notification, which I received from Google this morning upon signing onto Wifi and my blog:

For ease of reading, I include the transcribed text of this message below:

Our systems has detected unusual traffic from your computer network.  This page checks to see if it's really you sending the requests, and not a robot.  Why did this happen?

This page appears when Google automatically detects requests coming from your computer network which appear to be in violation of the Terms of Service.  The block will expire shortly after those requests stop.  In the meantime, solving the above CAPTCHA will let you continue to use our services.

This traffic may have been sent by malicious software, a browser plug-in, or a script that sends automated requests.  If you share your network connection, ask your administrator for help -- a difference computer using the same IP address may be responsible.

Sometimes you may be asked to solve the CAPTCHA if you are using advanced terms that robots are known to use or sending requests very quickly.

Clearly, one of the most critical phrases in the above notification is that "a different computer using the same IP address may be responsible.

It is concerning that Google references violations of its Terms of Service, suggesting that access to Google may be revoked due to IP impersonation by a someone residing close by on Vista Verde Way, who is also piggybacking on our Wifi, likely for the purposes of engaging in falsified law enforcement reporting.

I will attempt to keep your Office updated about apparent obstruction of my attempts to communicate through this blog.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Update Regarding Txx Lxxxx: Recent Threats Extended by FBI Affiliates

Update:  This dialogue has been expanded.

*************************************************************************************

1.  What are the most serious current threats you're facing?

Answer:  Well, given that I'm an animal lover, I consider it to be terrible that my cat appears to be suddenly dying of heart failure after my stalker suggested that he was deploying HAARP toward our residence with the intention of causing heart failure.

2.  What is your cat's condition?

Answer:  Very poor.

3.  What other threats have you received today?

Answer:  My stalker seems to be suggesting that the FBI is pushing for a violent narcotics raid on our residential address based on knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  The narcotics twist on this threat appears to be relatively new.

4.  You and your family have nothing to do with illegal substances?

Answer:  We do not.

4. Has your stalker asserted that your son Duncan has been threatened once more into lying about your family?

Answer:  Yes, he has asserted that both Duncan and Mary are currently receiving threats of disability and/or death if they do not provide falsified reports to the FBI on command.

5.  What do you mean by disability?

Answer:  There appear to be specific threats toward Duncan and Mary of FBI affiliates causing brain damage through DEW deployment.

6..  I understand.  I'm sure those threats are horrifying for your family to receive.  Is it your belief that one or more of those falsified reports coerced by Txx Lxxxx from your younger son could be used to justify a violent law enforcement raid on your home?

Answer:  Absolutely.  I asked previously that Duncan be separated from his handler Txx Lxxxx, whose career is now on the line due to his violation of the Hatch Act.  In the absence of that separation, coerced falsehoods that threaten the lives of my whole family are almost inevitable.

7.  Any other threats that have caught your attention today?

Answer:  My stalker appears to be threatening an "explosion" at my younger son's address in San Francisco.  He has also threatened a "staged suicide" toward one of us, which is to say a murder made to look like a suicide by overdose of some substance.  Threats of arson.  Threats of carbon monoxide poisoning.  And threats of "sniper assault" continue as well.

8.  Anything else?

Answer:  Threats of forced job loss for my husband and/or younger son.

On the property side, there are threats of the theft of a manuscript.  Advancing threats of forced property divestment through a catastrophic loss at my family home, leading to insurance cancellation by my insurance company, leading to lawsuit.  In addition, there are advancing threats of mooring cancellation due to malfeasance by the mooring commissioner/inspector and also boat divestment.  There's some scheme the FBI has concocted regarding unpaid Boat Yard invoices resulting in boats being taken into possession by the Navy, with all bills going to the owner.

9.  Are you paying Parker's Boat Yard's invoices?

Answer:  Parker's Boat Yard is failing to send me invoices, despite my repeated requests.  I'm guessing how much I owe them for boat storage and sending them checks every month.

10.  I see.  Anything more?

Answer:  Over the past few days, there have been some quite specific threats relating to a "slippery when wet or icy" sign posted on Los Trancos Rd.

11.  Do the threats suggest a staged car accident of some kind relating to this specific location?

Answer:  They do.

12.  Are there any additional threats pertaining to slander and defamation?

Answer:  There have been many recent mentions of the FBI returning to the Library of Congress as a repository of defamatory information regarding my family.

13.  These mentions appear to be arriving in the wake of Wells Fargo's allegedly having served in this capacity for the FBI, violating your privacy for an unknown period of time.

Answer:  Yes, exactly so.

14.  Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Answer:  I do.

Lane MacWilliams