1. The FBI appears to allege that it lost the case before the Supreme Court, and further, that you will soon be notified by the Southern Poverty Law Center by attorneys who have represented you before the High Court. Is that so?
Answer: It is, but I would hasten to add that, at the same time, the FBI is extending threats of greatly stepped-up falsified law enforcement reporting concerning my whole family. So there are extensive threats of arrest, law-enforcement raids by corrupt officers, and ongoing coercion of my two sons -- and others -- to provide knowingly false witness statements about us as their parents.
2. What are your sons being asked to falsely report?
Answer: Animal cruelty, child neglect and abuse, espionage, repressed witnessing of capital crimes, even. Probably terroristic activity, knowing how the FBI approaches these things.
3. How do you mean?
Answer: There are only a few crimes which can justify a night-time police raid with guns drawn, and those are espionage, terrorism and capital crimes. So, when the FBI wants to break down your door and start firing, these are the false statements they will coerce from witnesses who are having their lives threatened the whole time.
4. And in your case, the FBI has actually suggested that corrupt San Mateo Sheriff's Deputy Rick Chaput might be tapped to wrongfully fire a weapon intended to lead to your injury. Is that true?
Answer: The FBI appears to waffle between Rick Chaput and two female law enforcement personnel whose names I don't know.
5. Why would they be pushing Rick Chaput to commit such a crime?
Answer: They seem to feel that he is already implicated in broadly falsifying a stalking report which the SMC Sheriff's Department has failed to provide through either FOIA or the California Public Records Act.
6. So he would have a motivation to harm you as a witness?
Answer: This is what the FBI alleges, yes.
7. And what about the two female deputies? Why would they be forced to commit such a crime?
Answer: I think the FBI feels that this would represent a less murderous circumstance in the public view. If female officers were to shoot a female resident in her home, perhaps it would feels less egregious than for male officers to shoot a female resident in her home.
8. Have these details been discussed in advance with the DA? Because this is extremely specific information.
Answer: The FBI alleges that they have indeed discussed these scenarios with the District Attorney. So that's alarming as well.
9. The intent is not really to send you off to prison for a crime you haven't committed? It is to cause you grievous bodily harm during an attempted arrest?
Answer: This is what the FBI suggests, yes. I don't think the FBI believes it could prevail against me in a court setting. The agency might try to engage in false claims against my family members, though.
10. On the basis of what claims?
Answer: Their usual three: espionage, terrorism and capital crimes. And they have suggested the aggregation of false reporting in other areas as well, such as drug trafficking, gun smuggling, human trafficking, insider trading, weapons charges, wild animal trafficking. This is a veritable grab bag of corrupt law enforcement reporting for them. They appear inclined to try every false accusation possible.
11. What are further lies that the FBI and its affiliates are forcing your sons to attest to in recently falsified witness statements?
Answer: According to the FBI, they include false assertions that I am a narcissistic and/or addicted parent, that I have anger problems, that I am mentally ill and have seen psychiatrists, that my husband caught me in an infidelity, that I am not monogamous or heterosexual, in contradiction of my longstanding marriage, on and on.
12. The FBI has suggested that some form of communication to you has been placed in the U.S Postal Service system or soon will be. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, this seems to be the assertion.
13. Is this related to the FBI's assertion that it has "three days to kill" you? Does that correspond to the time that such a piece of mail would be en route?
Answer: This could easily be the rationale for that time frame, yes.
14. And this appears to coincide with dramatically increased threats of arrest toward your whole family?
Answer: Yes, it does.
15. Your sons and MX are also being aggressively threatened at this time?
Answer: Oh, yes. My impression is that their circumstances are more pressured than they have ever been before.
16. Why do you say that?
Answer: My older son's texting sounds utterly unlike him. He is utilizing different vocabulary, different syntax, different thinking patterns -- all of which indicates to me that he is being told what to type, word for word, by someone else.
17. You know your sons well enough to recognize these changes?
Answer: Oh, yes. I raised them myself. I know how they express themselves, how they think, how they elaborate on an idea, their normal articulations within written language, everything.
18. So, when there's a wholesale change, you notice it right away?
Answer: Immediately.
19. What are the threats being extended to your older son at this time?
Answer: Toward both of my sons, the threats are alleged to include staged or directed suicide, hit-and-run, kidnapping, or directed assault on others, as per the precise instructions extended to them.
20. You have said that there are several means by which your older son's sovereignty has been imperiled at this time, along with that of your younger son. Is that the case?
Answer: It is, although I am prohibited from discussing all the means that have been deployed with this intent. What I can disclose is that they have both suffered torture over a prolonged period of time, and this has caused a functional erosion of their boundaries and their ability to say no to wrongful directives.
21. So you do not have confidence in their ability to resist wrongful directives at this time, even though you have every confidence that, if your sons had their sovereignty, they could indeed decline.
Answer. That is exactly so. I do not have confidence in their current ability to deny wrongful directives, and, at the same time, I have every confidence in the underlying fortitude and integrity of my sons themselves.
22. Can this question-and-answer help to maintain your safety between now and the arrival of communication about your case?
Answer: I believe it can, yes. I wholeheartedly do.
23. Will you please keep in close contact with regard to the safety of your family in these challenging circumstances?
Answer: Absolutely.
Lane MacWilliams
* Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
No comments:
Post a Comment