1. You have been told that your vote in the November election could result in the death of your entire family. Are you able to explain where this assertion could be originating?
Answer: People on both sides of the political spectrum appear to be keenly interest in my political thoughts. This is fair to say.
All notification to me of a class action in which I appear to be the lead plaintiff seems to have been blocked, as does provision of FOIA reports and investigative reports. This is also safe to say.
Meanwhile, falsified law enforcement reporting in the form of false witness statements coerced under threat by the DoD appear to be accelerating. Active harms are also being perpetrated against certain family members. I believe this is also verifiable, at least for investigators, and I believe harm to my older son perpetrated this past Friday, October 25, 2024 may have been verified this morning.
Further, the election is extremely closely contested, with a range of very plausible outcomes that could have dramatically differing outcomes pertaining to my case.
We currently are a nation divided against ourselves, and this divide exists not so much on strict political grounds as on ethical ones. Some people no longer support the rule of law, the authority of the Supreme Court, or by extension, any court at all, the Constitution, their oaths of office, or other guardrails pertaining to a functioning civilization.
At the same time, some who have assisted my family most in our survival have emerged within the DOJ, the Congress, the Supreme Court, and even segments of the FBI itself. And these people have stood at all points along the political spectrum. All of which is to say that virtue and honesty are dependent on an individual's integrity, not connected to any superficial identification.
This has always been the case, and it always will be the case. And this moral decision-making is the reason why the sovereignty of the individual is so critical to our future.
2. What are the circumstances under which you might lose your life because of your vote, though? And how could that vote affect your family members' lives?
Answer: Without going into too many scenarios, I will simply say that my family and I are not currently safe.
3. If you received reports in advance of the election, would you feel safe in voting?
Answer: Much, much safer, yes. Right now, the reports are being successfully suppressed. The law is being violated one hundred different ways in the perpetration of that suppression, and the governance surrounding this matter appears to be entirely absent. So, this is a terrible sign with regard to the government's commitment to uphold the civil liberties and human rights of the honorable public.
4. Do you feel that those who are currently authorizing knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting about your family members and about you yourself could easily take your lives following your vote in one direction or another?
Answer: Oh, yes. I do. And I do not believe that my family members can survive if I don't. So this is an extremely serious matter for all of us.
5. Do you feel that it's safe for your sons to vote under these circumstances, given that the reports have been withheld from you entirely?
Answer: I do not, actually. I'm quite worried about them. Any vote that they extend could greatly exacerbate their peril.
6. What about your husband?
Answer: My husband is not aware of our current circumstance as a family, so he is not going to be altering his patterns.
7. Yet, you would feel that you could safely vote if you received the reports in advance of November 5, 2024.
Answer: If I received the reports in advance of the election, someone in authority would have extended to me the communication that he or she was committed to my family's survival and my own. So, that's an entirely different circumstance from that which we are currently facing.
8. So the provision of reports in advance of the election is more than a matter of good faith to you. It's a matter of survival.
Answer: Yes, it is.
9. If you do not receive them, you will assume that the current administration is determined in every way to oppose your family's survival.
Answer: Yes, I will. I think that messaging is extremely clear.
10. What if the current administration feels that it cannot extend the reports due to aspects of the documents which implicate them?
Answer: Suppressing difficult material is not the prerogative of power. If this administration cannot provide me with the reports and the conversations that should accompany them, then they cannot support our survival either. That's an unethical choice, not a political one. And I take it as such.
11. You do not believe that murder for profit should ever be justified, even and especially by the highest of our elected officials.
Answer: I do not.
12. What can this administration do to explain its delays in providing you with the reports, its obstruction of the Supreme Court's rulings, its harms of your sons and MX, your husband and you yourself, and its authorization of ongoing falsified law enforcement reporting intended to further victimize all of you?
Answer: First, this administration needs to allow the provision of the reports. Second, if this administration needs to express apologies to us, it should endeavor to do so in a lawful, honorable and peaceable manner. Third, as I have said, I am interested in hearing from leaders who are genuinely interested in the preservation of our lives -- and at a much higher level of safety and security than the daily peril we are currently enduring. These steps are in all ways supportive of the rule of law, honorably applied, and every elected official should be endeavoring to maintain the rule of law, honorably applied.
13. You also feel that the issue of falsified law enforcement reporting is a non-partisan issue, in that those who object to the falsehoods, the threats, the defamation and the harm are people who have decided to support the long term freedom of mankind over and above dystopian predation by the government.
Answer: Well, I think we need to ask whether we hope that our children and grandchildren will be silenced, tortured, punished and harmed for original observations and free speech -- or whether we hope they will be educated, articulate, observant and participatory citizens possessing sovereign will within a thriving society. Totalitarianism does not look like freedom, and freedom does not look like imprisonment. And yes, these are non-partisan concerns.
14. You have been informed that your sons' journals, and MX's as well, are being dictated to them by their handlers, to falsify their experiences as forcible recruits of the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program.
Answer: Yes, I have.
15. What does it say about our government when a President is directing the falsification of what should be private journals of young people who have already been wrongfully victimized by the three-letter agencies?
Answer: It represents a total erasure of the individual, a complete eradication of actual history, personal lived experience, the legitimacy of human suffering, and the ethical mandate for a compassionate response. It's a devastating totalitarian act.
16. What do you feel on learning that your sons are now being offered billions, not millions, in order to sign falsified witness statements about their childhoods, which were quite loving, nurturing and idyllic, in truth?
Answer: Money will never equal honor. I have attempted to explain to my sons that any government that would murder their parents would never allow them to survive, given that they, too, are witnesses to terrible crimes perpetrated by the three-letter agencies. I can only hope they have been able to comprehend this truth.
17. Do you feel that it is shameful for the FBI to offer your sons billions of dollars to extend the lies that you are spies, or terrorists, or serial killers?
Answer: Any worthy person is going to see that attempt as shameful.
18. You would like to be able to vote on November 5th. Is that right?
Answer: I would like to be free from threat on November 5th, and being free from threat, to exercise my right as a highly honorable United States citizen, defending the rights of others, to cast my vote in a free and fair election. Yes, I would.
19. But you cannot be free from threat without the provision of the reports. Isn't that so?
Answer: That is exactly so.
20. Will you please update us on this subject as election day draws nearer?
Answer: Yes, I will. Most certainly.
21. Thank you for your thoughts today.
Answer: You're quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment