1. Your stalker has conveyed to you that your housecleaner, Pedro Castaneda, and other staff at his company, Maria & Maria, cooperated with FBI directives to collect strands of your hair and your husband's hair as they were engaged in sweeping and cleaning your residence.
Answer: Yes, he has communicated that this privacy violation occurred at the FBI's direction and for compensation through Infragard.
2. Why is this important?
Answer: Hair strands can be utilized in falsified law enforcement reporting as planted DNA/RNA "evidence" at crime scenes. FBI agents with a malevolent intent could frame anyone by unlawfully acquiring strands of their hair and misusing this material.
3. And DNA/RNA evidence is viewed as being incontrovertible, so if the FBI says the agency has definitive proof that a given person was present at a given scene, this assertion carries tremendous weight.
Answer: It does. And if that deceptively used DNA/RNA evidence is combined with AI-generated film co-opting the likeness of a "target" in a given location, I think the vast majority of people would believe that an individual was decisively implicated in wrongdoing.
4. Why would the FBI put so much effort into wrongly implicating a person of malfeasance?
Answer: FBI personnel function under a military-style chain of command. So, the real question is why would the FBI leadership be interested in exerting total control over the fates of law-abiding American citizens whom it has wrongfully designated as "targets of interest"?
5. And why would they?
Answer: Totalitarian systems seek complete political, economic and social control over the populace. If the FBI has the power to wrongfully implicate any given individual of crimes they did not commit, then authoritarian control will have been thoroughly established.
6. You have said previously that the "target of interest" list is disproportionately populated by Democrats, journalists, women and minorities.
Answer: This is what I have been told. And, if true, this would indicate to me that the FBI's "target of interest" program has likely long maintained anti-democratic political objectives.
7. How can a person defend himself or herself against false utilization of strands of their hair?
Answer: I really don't know. I have long hair which sheds fairly copiously around my house. When I clean my brush, I probably have a few hundred strands of hair gathered in a little blonde nest in the palm of my hand. This could easily be retrieved by a housecleaner. And strands of my husband's hair are often in his shower. So, it would not be at all difficult for FBI "informants" to gather this material at the instruction of the FBI. After that, the FBI could misuse that "evidence" quite liberally.
8. Did you have any sense that your housekeepers were behaving in an unusual manner?
Answer: They did begin to behave strangely.
9. In what regard?
Answer: There was an edge of desperation in their desire to enter our master bedroom and master bathroom.
10. You had cut off their access to these spaces after the threats you received?
Answer: I had, yes. But I encountered the housecleaning staff on a couple of occasions on which they were practically on their knees begging to enter this part of the home.
11. This seemed like something different from professional courtesy.
Answer: Very different. I had the impression that there was something personal at stake for these women. Whether it was an immigration application for a loved one, or whether it was direct cash that would have changed their lives permanently for the better -- I don't know. But it was a major motivator. A life-changing incentive.
12. You sensed that their desperation was linked to a life-altering incentive.
Answer: No question.
13. And one year earlier, did they sometimes behave in this unexplained manner?
Answer: Never. They were paid the same amount of money whether they cleaned every room in the house or not. Previously, they seemed delighted by any request that they skip cleaning certain areas within the house.
14. So, there was a dramatic change in their demeanor.
Answer: Without question, there was.
15. Your stalker has recently suggested that, if far right segments of the FBI cannot identify any wrongdoing on the part of a "target of interest," they will invent it out of whole cloth.
Answer: Yes, he has. These are the specific Pins that seemed to address the issue yesterday:
16. And simultaneous to this, you were receiving messages about strands of your hair having been easy to collect, as well as messages that your housecleaners had been deceitful in providing these strands of hair to the FBI.
Answer: Yes, that's true.
17. What's the solution to this terrible problem created by the FBI's lying about law-abiding American citizens for anti-democratic objectives?
Answer: I think the only solution is extremely rigorous investigation in one particular case. If the FBI can be proven to have engaged in falsified law enforcement reporting in one particular case, then the agency's conduct in a much broader context can be illuminated.
Falsified law enforcement reporting that lays claims to incontrovertible "evidence" in the form of wrongfully acquired DNA represents a rather stunning crime in and of itself. And we really need to keep in mind the likely objectives connected to this egregious misuse of power.
18. What are those likely objectives?
Answer: Total control over civilian populations that includes life-and-death determinations concerning those innocent of all wrongdoing.
19. Autocracy.
Answer: Nothing less.
20. President Biden has articulated his determined stance against such violations of the freedoms, rights and privacy of American citizens.
Answer: President Biden is a bright light for democracy in the face of this astonishing "insider threat" represented by the FBI and affiliated agencies.
21. Does democracy stand a chance given the FBI's sophisticated use of false evidence and disinformation?
Answer: We ourselves represent democracy's chance. We ourselves need to gather heroic strength in our attempt to defend what is true.
************************************************************************************
At the end of my posts regarding the unlawful actions of far-right personnel within the FBI, I will be adding the following statement. The FBI is a deeply divided agency. There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment. The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general. The safety of FBI agents should be protected, just as the safety of the American citizenry should be protected. As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance. The rule of law must always be honored and upheld. It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of ALL AMERICANS that renders the United States a democracy. We must never abandon this promise. All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.
No comments:
Post a Comment