My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Wednesday, August 17, 2022

Hangup Phone Calls as Utilized Within the FBI's Program of Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting

 August 17, 2022

OIG Hotline Investigators, after years of being harassed with hangup phone calls, it is my belief that the FBI and its affiliates are utilizing this tactic to allege participation in crimes of which we have no part whatsoever.

Today, for example, I received a hangup call from (925) 574-6803 at 3:48 p.m. on my home line xxx-xxx-1081.

At 7:06 p.m. this evening, I received a hangup call to the same home line xxx-xxx-1081 from (925) 574-6803.

After thousands of hangup calls, I would like to know what the callers think they are inquiring about.  Drug trafficking?  Human trafficking?  Or are these simply spoofed numbers created to bolster falsified law enforcement reporting on the part of the FBI?

Perhaps OIG Hotline investigators are capable of ascertaining whether these numbers are genuine and how the FBI is attempting to utilize hangup calls within its protocol of falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.




Lane MacWilliams

No comments:

Post a Comment