Friends, a bribe from the FBI can look as innocuous as the following job listing:
The main text of this email is as follows:
Hi Lane,
Capgemini has an opening for a Business Developement Executive -- Media and Entertainingment in their San Francisco, CA location. We thought you might be interested in this opportunity. To explore this further you'll find more details and the application instructions on the job details below.
I have no relationship to The Kimble Group. My LinkedIn account is not active. And my spam filter should prevent this from reaching my Gmail Inbox.
Further, one of the FBI's known stratagems in implicating "targets" is to extend job interviews to them. Why would this be the case?
The FBI has lied about "targets of interest" in falsely implicating them of myriad crimes. The problem arises in the small detail that law-abiding "targets of interest" are not profiting from those falsely alleged crimes. As a result, the FBI attempts to come up with a remunerative lure through which to allege that "targets" are seeking payoffs or bribes for their purportedly unlawful actions.
Under such circumstances, even to respond to a job listing such as this one could be condemnatory.
Should the FBI be spending the tax dollars of American citizens in trying to create falsified "payoffs" pertaining to crimes that never occurred?
Probably not.
I have a feeling the FBI is cognizant of this, but avoiding accountability for its crimes of falsified law enforcement reporting is paramount in the agency's internal ethos.
This is likely why The Kimble Group suddenly knows my name.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment