Maligning the psychological stability of "targets of interest" has served as an enormously successful stratagem for corrupt members of the FBI, so much so that it is safe to surmise that the agency has been making false claims about the psychological stability of "targets" since the beginning of the program's inception.
In particular, it appears that the FBI bribes and threatens informants to allege that "targets" possess delusional disorders, paranoia, mania and psychosis as mental illnesses that might correspond to an individual "target's" ideation about FBI surveillance.
I am told that, if a "target of interest" ever seeks counseling, she or he is typically falsely diagnosed with a delusional disorder at the direct instruction of the FBI. After that, it becomes difficult for a "target" to reclaim credibility when referencing FBI harassment.
Online, it seems that the FBI pays affiliates to comment on "target of interest" and "gangstalking" message boards in a manner that is nonsensical and irrational, so that casual observers can readily discount the membership of such groups as disconnected from a rational perspective.
The effectiveness of the FBI's effort to discredit the veracity and stability of "targets of interest" in this manner is, indeed, impressive.
Yet, it is also based on a deception that is both highly sophisticated and stunningly malicious, and it deserves to be exposed to the public view.
To demonstrate the determination of the FBI to discredit "targets of interest" in this manner, I hold possession of a bill in my name, dated January of 2021, for a psychiatric visit that never took place. Clearly, the FBI is intent to make a tangible claim to bolster its falsehoods in this realm.
Beyond this, I am told that the FBI paid Dr. Jacob Ballon and Dr. Kristen Stent to falsify statements concerning me, even though these doctors do not know me, and I am not their patient.
Now, apparently, FBI informants are being bribed and threatened by the FBI to falsely allege psychological instability on my part in their discussions with federal investigators.
If this is in fact occurring, those informants are lying, and those lies are being scripted by their FBI handlers in every nuance and detail.
I will say this: "targets of interest" have been terribly abused, harassed, slandered and maligned by FBI personnel and affiliates -- and they have every right to be upset about those unlawful predations being perpetrated by the very men who ought to be protecting them from harm.
What is the appropriate response when paid FBI informants line up to call "targets of interest" crazy?
Perhaps the appropriate response is to ask how much they are being paid to advance this false narrative with federal investigators? Beyond this, what threats did their FBI handlers extend to them to persuade them to lie in this manner?
Such informant claims represent a shameful betrayal of the truth, certainly, and one that must be revealed to the public as the corrosive and damaging defamation the FBI has designed it to be.
The mutual bonds of trust and truthfulness required by our democracy necessitate that we reveal the FBI's scheme of coercing informants to call "targets" psychologically unstable.
The agency leadership has placed a higher value on the congressional budget appropriations for the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative than it has on the central requirement that it uphold the Constitution in all circumstances.
The rest of us need to be exceptionally rational and clear-eyed about the FBI's ethical failures within this choice.
Not only that, it is up to us to prove that the corruption of the far-right is not capable of silencing whistleblowers who speak the truth about the FBI's engagement in falsified law enforcement reporting.
It is a crime to knowingly engage in the defamation of falsely alleging that "targets of interest" are psychologically unbalanced. FBI informants are routinely coerced by their handlers into committing this crime, and this malfeasance should be fully illuminated.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct,
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment