Lane von Herzen: The FBI's Ongoing Deployment of Ionizing Radiation in an Effort to Silence a Whisteblower

My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.

Tuesday, April 25, 2023

The FBI's Ongoing Deployment of Ionizing Radiation in an Effort to Silence a Whisteblower

OIG Hotline, this is to document that, according to my Geiger counter, I was exposed to dangerously high levels of ionizing radiation last night during sleeping hours.

This morning, those high levels persisted in multiple areas of my Portola Valley residence.

I am uncertain of the modality of delivery, but there was a pressurized, mechanical that I have not heard before emanating from the crawl space underneath my home. This unusual sound appeared to be synchronized with high radioactivity measurements.

Unlike the radioactive exposures through Cal Water, this incident was not associated with a highly radioactive public water supply.

So, there is an independent source of radioactivity which the FBI appears to be deploying within my home.

I need to reflect for a moment on the U.N.'s Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which, in Article 5, states that "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment."

Surely, intentional exposures to hazardous ionizing radiation with the objective of causing demise qualify as torture.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights also states, in Article 19, that "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression and opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers."

Freedom of speech.

One must ask whether Christopher Wray has read the Constitution or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights during his tenure as Director of the FBI. One must wonder whether he is aware of the contents of these documents.

It is my understanding that he took a vow to uphold the Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, and which enshrines freedom of speech in its First Amendment, not as an afterthought, but as an inviolable and essential right for all Americans.

If my own experience serves as a guide, Christopher Wray has knowingly violated his fundamental oath to protect Americans from assaults upon their civil liberties and human rights.

The question is why.

As uncomfortable as this matter is to broach, Christopher Wray appears to be acting in concert with Russian-affiliated organized crime interests within the United States. That is to say, he appears to be failing in his defense of the Constitution by assailing law-abiding American citizens at the behest of a foreign enemy.

Is there any compensation that could render such an ignominious betrayal of the American public justified?

Is there any material reward that could explain such a character failure on the part of the man charged with leading America's vaunted federal law enforcement agency?

Is there any threat that could cause the abandonment of this man's patriotism, his loyalty to America's most cherished principles, his commitment to the set of professional ethics that must guide his agency in its task?

I can only answer by way of attesting that there is no bribe or threat, no inducement or coercion that could compel me to wield totalitarian harms against the American public in the manner that FBI Director Christopher Wray appears to be currently wielding them.

I saw a wonderful film recently called "Judgment at Nuremberg," in which those civil court judges who condemned German citizens according to persecutory Nazi laws during World War II were themselves required to explain their failures of character, judgment, and humanity through a public trial after the War.

At the end of the film, one of the most enlightened Nazi judges among the defendants references the Holocaust when he states, "I never knew that millions would die."

The head of the tribunal evaluating his crimes answers, "You guaranteed that it would happen the first time you condemned an innocent man."

Can Christopher Wray explain to the Ameerican public how many Americans the "target of interest" program has knowingly, willfully, unconstitutionally harmed? How about the Phoenix program?

Were these Americans merely "non-investigative subjects" or were they people?

Were they objects of defamation and torture, or were they human beings?

Did they exist as slaves to the whims of the FBI's "disposition matrix" or were they dignified and whole possessors of their own souls, whose human rights were never his to violate?

As difficult as these questions may be to ask, their answers hold the key to all future freedoms for Americans. If we hope to protect those freedoms, we must find the courage to hold duplicitous officials within the three-letter agencies to a full and public accounting of their crimes against the American public. And soon.