1. The FBI has alleged that the agency is taking part in some type of entrapment scheme to falsely implicate your family of wrongdoing. Do you have any idea what that scheme involves?
Answer: There seem to have been multiple entrapment schemes on the part of the FBI, in truth. But the agency appears to be giving some hints that this one involves the FBI's false allegations that my younger son and my spouse are both engaged in "espionage" or "industrial espionage," and that when they meet, there is some form of sensitive technical communication taking place.
2. Is there any sensitive technical communication taking place when your younger son meets with your husband? Your family got together for a birthday celebration this last weekend, for example, although loving families are known to celebrate birthdays together.
Answer: There is absolutely no sensitive technical communication taking place, no.
3. Your younger son has been tortured by the FBI, though, as has his girlfriend and your older son as well. Is it possible that your younger son is falsely alleging the receipt of sensitive information under threat from his corrupt FBI handler Tom Lyons?
Answer: You know, once torture is involved -- and in this case there are proofs that the crimes on the part of the FBI have been egregious -- the FBI becomes empowered to make any demands for false reporting that it wants to make. That's why it becomes so critical to disallow all witness statements by victims of torture.
4.. Is the FBI's intent in this scheme the wrongful detention or arrest of both your husband and your younger son?
Answer: It seems to be, in that I have received hundreds of "like father, like son" warnings connected to messages of "trap" and "arrest."
5.. So, the agency is attempting to victimize both your husband and your son in this scenario? Or are FBI personnel attempting to victimize your whole family further?
Answer: I would suspect they're attempting to implicate our whole family of wrongdoing in such a manner that would allow the non-payment of settlements and penalties awarded in my name by the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.
6.. Why do you say that?
Answer: The FBI is very focused on that money, from everything I have been able to tell. They want to appropriate a portion of it at the very least, but in order to do that, they have to wrongfully accuse me of committing a felony.
7. Or alternatively, the FBI could take your life. Isn't that true?
Answer: True. The agency could commit first degree murder.
8.. So is the agency attempting to suggest that you yourself are involved in espionage in some capacity?
Answer: I'm not certain. The FBI might attempt to take their false allegations that far in order to manifest their entrapment scheme. (Let it be known that I think "entrapment" is a misnomer in this case, because all of the so-called "evidence" is invented. The FBI isn't inducing us to break the law. Rather, the FBI is simply lying.)
7. Couldn't those lies be easily unmasked in a court proceeding?
Answer: They could, yes. And this is the reason that the FBI's reported plan may take a darker turn in becoming a scheme of first-degree murder of an honorable whistleblower. If the agency cannot prevail in an open court proceeding, which it cannot, then the agency will attempt to perpetrate violence against me in particular through an unjustified law enforcement raid on our home.
8. The agency could direct corrupt law enforcement personnel to shoot you during a wrongful raid on your home?
Answer: Yes.
9. This would be characterized as an "accidental" shooting?
Answer: Almost certainly.
10. So, in such a scenario, you wouldn't necessarily be implicated in false "espionage" charges at all. If the FBI is simply attempting to justify a wrongful raid on your home, the agency could manage this by lying about your husband alone, and it could do so by scripting the false testaments of both of your sons at once. Isn't that possible?
Answer: This would seem entirely possible, yes. If the agency simply needs access to our home during a wrongful arrest in order to perpetrate intended violence toward me -- then yes, they could target my husband alone or my husband and son.
11. And during a violent raid, corrupt law enforcement could also confiscate your documents, isn't that true? Because this has also been an objective of the agency.
Answer: Yes, absolutely, corrupt law enforcement could waltz off with my documents in their entirety if they made the false allegation that they needed to examine my documents for signs of "espionage" or "terrorism" through the wrongful invocation of The Espionage Act or The Patriot Act pertaining to anyone in my household.
12. May I ask who is responsible for disqualifying knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting consisting of the false witness statements of both of your sons, as well as they false statements of MG in the past?
Answer: President Biden needs to give guidance to the OIG Hotline and the ODNI allowing for the disqualification of false law enforcement reporing.
13. Yet you just caught President Biden in colluding with Tom Lyons and Bxxxxxx Pxxx to harm your family in particularly appalling ways. Isn't that true? Isn't there text messaging that implicates the President in unlawful plans of harm against your family?
Answer: There is, yes.
14. And when the DoD visits both of your sons to demand false witness statements after a family birthday celebration, as happened on Monday, isn't this occurring at the directive of President Biden?
Answer: It is, yes.
15. So, if uniformed DoD personnel showed up at your sons' homes and told them to sign a testament that the sun revolved around the Earth, would they sign it?
Answer: Yes, they would.
16. Because they have been tortured at the directive of the President.
Answer: They have, yes.
17. So the conflicts of interest for President Biden are overwhelming at this point, given that he has just been found to be colluding in indefensible harms against your family members, including harms that involve coerced human trafficking.
Answer: Yes, the conflicts of interest are everywhere for the President, which is the reason I have called for his resignation over this matter.
18. You believe that the President of the United States should not be involved in predatory human trafficking and schemes of first-degree murder for profit.
Answer: That's a fair statement to make. And I also do not believe the President should be torturing the sons of a highly honorable whistleblower in order to coerce their false witness statements on demand from DoD personnel showing up at their door.
19. To be clear, your sons did not disclose the repeated demands of DoD personnel. But the FBI did.
Answer: That is correct.
20. Given that your sons and MG have been repeatedly tortured for false witness statements, shouldn't all of them be prohibited from providing any further witness statements regarding this matter whatsoever? Especially because the FBI has 24/7 communications access to your younger son and MG, and the CIA has 24/7 communications access to your older son.
Answer: Their past witness statements should all be rendered null and void by a court proceeding based on the torture they have all suffered, yes. And no further statements should be coerced from them regarding this matter.
21. You are still receiving threats to all of their lives, isn't that so? Yesterday, after your older son moved into a new apartment, you received threats from the FBI that included a "fall from a window or roof" as a form of staged suicide, in addition to threats of arson, carbon monoxide poisoning, Dxx deployment, pathogen exposure, fentanyl overdose, heroin overdose, ketamine overdose, toxin exposure, "street crime," hit-and-run, kidnapping, and alterations to foundational health.
Answer: That list is not complete, but yes, both of my sons and MG are being threatened with these harms.
22. At the directive of the President of the United States.
Answer: At the directive of the President of the United States, yes.
23. So, this is untenable.
Answer: Entirely untenable, yes.
24. This demonstrates the perils to the nation of having a President who maintains close friendships to those in organized crime, does it not?
Answer: It truly does. The President should not be deploying gangsters to harm the honorable citizenry for profit. He needs to step down as Commander in Chief, given the proofs of his crimes that have recently emerged.
25. You sent some meaningful texts to your sons yesterday in partly addressing this situation. Are you willing to disclose their contents here?
Answer: Of course. To my older son, I sent the following text (names are here redacted.)
Sweetheart, while I’m waiting for the photo of your new apartment, I should tell you that the FBI reports the DoD has been coercing more false witness statements from you, allegedly demanding false allegations of terrorism, espionage, trafficking, abuse, predation, on and on. I’m told they’ve done the same thing to Dxxxxx and Mxxx — showed up in uniform, two at a time, and said “sign here” regarding complete falsehoods. It was so wonderful to see you yesterday, and especially to have the chance to talk about the lamentable role of torture in totalitarian regimes. The manner in which you and Dxxxxx and Mxxx have been tortured for the purpose of coercing lies from the three of you stands as an affront to every form of justice we can name. The DoD won’t stop until the President halts the command to torture innocents. So we need President Biden to halt his corrupt demands in order for our family to begin to heal. Let’s hope that his corrupt harms toward the three of you will be exposed to the extent that he’ll be shamed into stopping. One thing that torturers despise is exposure of their own acts. Let’s hope President Biden will comprehend that harming you and bribing you in the extraction of lies about our loving family will ultimately undermine all of his most meaningful contributions.
And to my younger son, I sent the following:
Sweetheart, I’m so sorry I missed you yesterday. Gxxxxx enjoyed visiting with you tremendously. I just reached out to him to let him know the following: the FBI reports the DoD has been coercing more false witness statements from you, allegedly demanding false allegations of terrorism, espionage, trafficking, abuse, predation, on and on. I’m told they’ve done the same thing to M and to Gxxxxx — showed up in uniform, two at a time, and said “sign here” regarding complete falsehoods. It was so wonderful to see Gxxxxx yesterday, and especially to have the chance to talk about the lamentable role of torture in totalitarian regimes. The manner in which you and M and Gxxxxx have been tortured for the purpose of coercing lies from the three of you stands as an affront to every form of justice we can name. The DoD won’t stop until the President halts the command to torture innocents. So we need President Biden to halt his corrupt demands in order for our family to begin to heal. Let’s hope that his corrupt harms toward the three of you will be exposed to the extent that he’ll be shamed into stopping. One thing that torturers despise is exposure of their own acts. Let’s hope President Biden will comprehend that harming you and bribing you in the extraction of lies about our loving family will ultimately undermine all of his most meaningful contributions.
26. You wish to make clear that you are being forced to disclose this information publicly for the sole reason that President Biden, Tom Lyons and Bxxxxxx Pxxx continue to threaten the lives of your family members and of you yourself.
Answer: There are only a few circumstances under which it becomes necessary to disclose the extraordinary and persistent criminality of a public figure. But the ongoing threat to members of the public is one of them.
27. If you had honorable and lawful outreach from the Democrats, you could withdraw some of these disclosures from the public sphere, couldn't you?
Answer: President Biden should resign at this point, given the crimes in which he has participated and continues to participate. And yes, honorable and lawful outreach is required.
28. What about your three beloved young people who have been so sorely abused by President Biden's directives?
Answer: The only safety for them will come from complete disconnection from all government programs on an immediate basis. The means of communication with their handlers should be immediately removed. All witness statements from them should be disqualified without exception. And their needs for healing and privacy, together with my family's ability to gather safely to discuss these issues in a private context, must be prioritized.
29. You have had no contact whatsoever from a high-level attorney to help you address these matters of pressing concern?
Answer: I have not. In fact, my attempts to obtain that representation have been aggressively obstructed.
30. Yet that would represent the most reasonable next step, wouldn't it?
Answer: Yes, it would.
31. Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of your knowledge and belief?
Answer: Yes, I do.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment